I really agree with the muslims on this one, not our dictator...I mean president
http://news.yahoo.com/maybe-iran-one-214900640.html
Printable View
I really agree with the muslims on this one, not our dictator...I mean president
http://news.yahoo.com/maybe-iran-one-214900640.html
I have no problem with dems, I have a huge problem with socialist
http://conservativedemocrats.org/
I WISH BHO was a Dem......what world is THAT guy in?? Dem? :gah:
Romney, Gingrich and Santorum all agree with the Kenyan on the tremendous importance of foreign aid.
Of course, there actually is a presidential candidate that disagrees with this irretrievable stupidity.
It's not R's and D's here folks, its doing the same thing expecting different results, which is the definition of what?
How long and how many Presidents keep doing the same thing, intervening in the affairs of the Middle East, giving money, propping up dictators, trying to influence how Middle Easterners run their lives? Why? Oh yeah, it's worked so well over the last, what 40-45 years, right?
Maybe, ole Ron Paul has it right? Maybe at least we'll try something a little different, like protecting the rights of the American Citizen, and spend our money a little more wisely and let the Middle East deal with themselves. And, like he said in the last debate, when and if we have to get involved, make it by a declaration of war then go fight like it's a war and get it over and come home.
I'm thinking that quirky (maybe kooky) little dude might just have the right idea. At least at this point, with the Marxist (Oblummer), the Elitest (Romney), the Reagan wannabe (Gingrich) and the Sanitorium (Ricky), he seems like the only choice for changing things for the better across the table.
And yes, I know, any of the R's are better than the Marxist, but I'm really starting to think Ron Paul is the only really sane one in the bunch.:grin2: