Reply to Thread

Post a reply to the thread: Need help with math problem

Your Message

 
 

You may choose an icon for your message from this list

Register Now

Please enter the name by which you would like to log-in and be known on this site.

Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Log-in

Additional Options

  • Will turn www.example.com into [URL]http://www.example.com[/URL].

Topic Review (Newest First)

  • 01-19-2005, 11:37 PM
    condenseddave
    Originally posted by ac rookie
    I think I am going into another field. I will never figure this stuff out!!!
    It's not hard. Actually, to accomplish what Mid wants to accomplish, you spend fifty bucks on a ductulator that does this FOR you...
  • 01-19-2005, 11:35 PM
    condenseddave
    Originally posted by Steve Wiggins
    I guarantee you this will seperate the Dems from the Repubs right quick. We will always have the thinkers vs. the doers.
    Are you lost again, buttcheek?
  • 01-19-2005, 11:34 PM
    condenseddave
    Originally posted by Andy Schoen
    Originally posted by glennwith2ns
    Originally posted by mattm
    You big bunch of math nerds.
    Yea , bet they got pocket protectors too>)
    And only the best pocket protectors... We're still trying to figure out where to put that Parker name on them...
    Do me a favor-------------DON'T put it on there.
  • 01-19-2005, 10:01 PM
    Andy Schoen
    Originally posted by glennwith2ns
    Originally posted by mattm
    You big bunch of math nerds.
    Yea , bet they got pocket protectors too>)
    And only the best pocket protectors... We're still trying to figure out where to put that Parker name on them...
  • 01-19-2005, 09:55 PM
    Andy Schoen
    Originally posted by midhvac
    But I wanted to know how to find the diameter when CFM and pd are known. With your help, I've got it now. My $8.99 Casio scientific calculator won't allow me to use a decimal point in a fractional exponent, so I couldn't do ^1/5.02. So I just changed it from a fraction to a decimal equivalent of .1992

    dia = (.109136 x CFM^1.9/pd)^.1992


    You've got the idea.

    If I'm reading your equation correctly (I really should look it up), you can get precise answers doing the following on your Casio:

    calculate A:

    A = CFM^1.9

    next B:

    B = .109136 x A /pd

    next C:

    C = LN(B) this is the natural log of B (I'm assuming the Casio has log functions)

    next D:

    D = C / 5.02

    finally E:

    E = exp(D) this is the e^x function which is inverse to the natural log

  • 01-19-2005, 08:34 PM
    Steve Wiggins
    I guarantee you this will seperate the Dems from the Repubs right quick. We will always have the thinkers vs. the doers.
  • 01-19-2005, 08:02 PM
    midhvac
    Thanks again Andy. I got it now. The reason for my questions was that I was trying to figure out how the different ductulator formulas work so I could use my scientific calculator to do them, or plug them into an Excel spreadsheet application. Somebody else here was asking about the formulas a while back, but nobody knew them. I found a formula that calculates the pressure drop per 100' when the cfm and duct diameter are known:

    pd = (.109136 x CFM^1.9)/dia^5.02

    But I wanted to know how to find the diameter when CFM and pd are known. With your help, I've got it now. My $8.99 Casio scientific calculator won't allow me to use a decimal point in a fractional exponent, so I couldn't do ^1/5.02. So I just changed it from a fraction to a decimal equivalent of .1992

    dia = (.109136 x CFM^1.9/pd)^.1992


  • 01-19-2005, 05:49 PM
    glennwith2ns
    Originally posted by mattm
    You big bunch of math nerds.
    Yea , bet they got pocket protectors too>)
  • 01-19-2005, 05:19 PM
    mattm
    You big bunch of math nerds.
  • 01-19-2005, 03:58 AM
    ac rookie
    I think I am going into another field. I will never figure this stuff out!!!
  • 01-18-2005, 10:57 PM
    Andy Schoen
    Originally posted by midhvac
    Hey! Wait a minute! Why are we using 1/6? Is it because the answer to b is 6? So I have to know the answer before I can work the problem?
    Nope. Using apropriate math:

    a = (2 x 20^4) / b^6

    a = 320,000 / b^6

    b^6 = 320,000 / a

    (b^6)^(1/6) = (320,000 / a)^(1/6)

    b = (320,000 / a)^(1/6)
  • 01-18-2005, 10:50 PM
    Andy Schoen
    Originally posted by midhvac
    Originally posted by condenseddave
    Mid-

    You are going to sprain your brain if you keep this up.
    Nah, I put an elastic support around my head, just in case.
    Let's put that elastic support to work...

    Using your calculator, solve the following:

    x^3 = x * x * x = -27

    or x = (-27)^(1/3)

    A little figuring will show that 'x' must equal -3, i.e., -3 * -3 * -3 = -27

    Why does the calculator fail to figure this out?



  • 01-18-2005, 10:46 PM
    midhvac
    Hey! Wait a minute! Why are we using 1/6? Is it because the answer to b is 6? So I have to know the answer before I can work the problem?
  • 01-18-2005, 10:19 PM
    midhvac
    Originally posted by condenseddave
    Mid-

    You are going to sprain your brain if you keep this up.
    Nah, I put an elastic support around my head, just in case.
  • 01-18-2005, 10:17 PM
    midhvac
    You guys rock! Thanks! I've got a scientific calculator and the 1/6 power works.
  • 01-18-2005, 09:53 PM
    Andy Schoen
    Originally posted by midhvac
    In this formula b = 6

    a = (2 x 20^4) / b^6
    So the answer is 6.8587

    Perhaps some number theory may be appropriate here.

    'a' in this example is equal to exactly 320,000 / 46,656 or approximately 6.85871056241426611796982167352538 (using Microsoft calculator )

    'a' is considered a 'rational' number because it can be wriiten as a fraction, i.e., x / y where x and y are integers.

    Originally posted by midhvac

    If I already knew that a = 6.8587, and b was the unknown, how would I solve that problem so that the answer to b didn't come out in exponential form. I mean, so that the answer would come out as "6" instead of something to the something power?

    Ok, lets assume 'a' = 7, what is 'b'?

    b = (320,000 / 7)^(1/6)

    where 'b' is approximately 5.979643919487405903197485402773 (again using Microsoft calculator)

    In this case, 'b' is an irrational number. There is no fraction, x / y, that can define 'b' where x and y are integers. Think about it! No integer numbers whatsoever. Raising this expression to the 1/6th power causes this to occur.

    Mmmmm... so does this help?
  • 01-18-2005, 07:38 PM
    westcoast refer man
    midhvac,

    Do the basic algebra and up end up with:

    b=(2x20^4/a)all raised to the 1/6

    You need a scientific calculator to get what b is. That is, 46656.07 ^1/6

    plug in all the numbers and the answer is 6.

    Is this what you were asking?
  • 01-18-2005, 07:31 PM
    condenseddave
    Mid-

    You are going to sprain your brain if you keep this up.
  • 01-18-2005, 06:22 PM
    coolwhip
    Holy cow...your asking me to remember my pre calculus days. When your trying to solve to that power things get tuff. Well, I will tell you right now Im not going to do it!





































    Im glad thats over.
  • 01-18-2005, 06:03 PM
    midhvac
    In this formula b = 6

    a = (2 x 20^4) / b^6
    So the answer is 6.8587

    If I already knew that a = 6.8587, and b was the unknown, how would I solve that problem so that the answer to b didn't come out in exponential form. I mean, so that the answer would come out as "6" instead of something to the something power?

    If it did come out as something to the something power, how would I convert that to a regular number?



Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •