Reply to Thread

Post a reply to the thread: Geothermal for Baseboard Heating

Your Message

 
 

You may choose an icon for your message from this list

Register Now

Please enter the name by which you would like to log-in and be known on this site.

Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Log-in

Additional Options

  • Will turn www.example.com into [URL]http://www.example.com[/URL].

Topic Review (Newest First)

  • 07-05-2013, 04:34 PM
    GT1980
    Priority HW with W:W units can use but ++more baseboard for heating with under 120*F HW; however, R-22 it was easier on everything, and just a fraction of what is left to be worked on, I believe. (+fancoils, etc. WP correct on SOME as $$$ add up)

    Full sized condensing/HotWater-INSTANT-ON-DEMAND "hybrids" "combinations" "Priority" that you know makes HW for BOTH space heating and HVAC Air IS working very well since 2003 and several with radiant high mass heating and heat recovery applications and Potable HW and Heat-Reclaim in cooling to HW, all in one, not rated in that mode, but still rated..

    First W:W in 1981 runs today on baseboard and very well governed supplemental control ranges (other zones, than just the GT-Boiler-Zones, helps and some "spot electric" additions, mats, f/air, radiation )

    However, if nGas back-up, then shut off the 410a around 104 deg outlet (even at 4 gpm/ton) because 10-11cent electric (total billing averaged with transport charges) is nearly the same with $12 totally billed-averaged nGas per MCF)

    You may see highest COP's
    don't yield lowest costs
    compared to
    annual $COP$ in low to medium variable outputs, just like 3-staged dual compressor sm+lg=3rd as both (before supplemental back up being a 4th staging) .

    http://www.energystar.gov/index.cfm?...mal_heat_pumps

    although highest speed is ETL/EnergyStar(tm) 3rd party rated 30.8 or 31+ EER. and etc.

    AHRI Trane, CM, Water Furnace, to Hydro-Temp (of AR, not hydro-delta-hyd-ht of PA) Variable (VFD, Iq) Compressor staging blended in Low-Med speed "raw data: 40-to-42.1 EER" etc., respectively to OEM's.
    Then just for "boiler-hydronics" and baseboards, you will average higher than COP's $ wise say adding enough baseboard and in parallel runs (a lot) for up to 116*f flows over 4gpm per ton HW outputs::: talk to your low temp - say - solar and condensing boiler pros - and pay for the consults, to save many dollars throughout all your considerations.

    Pushing past 126 outlet temps r410a at slower flow rates with say 106*f return temps is really very hard on compressors. BUT ASK YOUR GT- LOW TEMP DISTRIBUTION PRO, and get some performance guarantees included and checked.
  • 03-06-2013, 08:13 PM
    geodean
    nothing talked about here is ground breaking....it has all been done many time before.
  • 03-03-2013, 08:49 PM
    Shukakubrat
    I don't know anything on the topic, but it sounds like an interesting subject that I'm going to actively research and find out more about. I think that it would be an interesting and ground breaking development in the industry. I'm still learning and working on my degree for HVAC/R, but this is something that I would like to see come into being.
  • 01-31-2013, 04:10 PM
    waterpirate
    I do not feel that heat transfer would be an issue, it is just goop. I would expect it to have the same transfer rate as the concrete we are sealing.

    Technical note: my zone is not Nova Scotia! When I was there in the late 70's in August, I had to go to the store and get more clothes! I was freezing. lol
    Eric
  • 01-31-2013, 01:59 PM
    Bunyan
    Nice, thanks for the info. I think it was $12 a tube for the 2 part epoxy and it was basically toast after one job. I guess the only other questions would be regarding heat transfer. I understand how the properties of bentonite would create a water tight seal but would you get a significant amount of heat transfer from the inside of the house to out during the heating season? Is there something else providing a thermal barrier or is it fine as is?

    Sorry for derailing this thread slightly.

    Cheers
  • 01-31-2013, 06:22 AM
    waterpirate
    Hi,
    We use a granular bentonite product that is commonly used in the drilling industry. Benseal is one trade name, 8/25 mesh bentonite is the spec. When mixed with water it creates a watertight seal that has the consistancy of very thick peanut butter. It never dries out and can re-hydrate for its entire life. Cost = 12.00 for 50 pound bag, enough to seal about 50 holes.
    Eric
  • 01-30-2013, 11:20 PM
    Bunyan
    Sorry Larry, but site rules prohibit discussing pricing. Fortunately there is a contractor look-up feature that may help you contact someone local that may be able to give you some figures.

    Waterpirate (Eric), I noticed in some of your photos where you're running the geo pipe through the foundation that you are running it through a 3-4" pvc sleeve. What are you using to seal it up? The company I worked for previously would run the geo pipe itself through and just use a 2 part epoxy and that did the trick/never leaked. Thoughts?
  • 01-30-2013, 06:31 AM
    waterpirate
    The tax credits will not expire before 2016, barring any bankruptcy proceedings by the govt. lol
    Eric
  • 01-30-2013, 03:26 AM
    LarryF

    thanks

    Thanks for your comments. I did expect some discouraging words and I know there is some risk here. That's why these things are subsidized, to get people to try them when they're not fully proven. It's obvious that the manufacturers are proceeding cautiously with these new high-temperature units. Waterfurnace has a only one 7-ton model and Carrier/Bryant has only their 3-ton 50YEW, which by coincidence is just about what I would need. Despite generally positive experiences with geo, you do hear of projects where the calculations didn't hold up and the systems couldn't hold temperature in midwinter. But here in Virginia we've got a relatively warm 60° ground temperature and increasingly mild winters, so that's a big advantage. Still, I suspect I'd be keeping the old oil-fired boiler for backup; it's relatively new and fairly compact. Meanwhile, maybe I'll just try turning down the boiler temporarily to 140° or 130° on a cold night just how much heat the system puts out.

    Radiant floor heat would doubtless be more efficient and is a possibility in the long term, at least for parts of the house. The kitchen and bathroom floors all need replaced anyway, so that would be a good opportunity for PEX installation. Two bedrooms and the living room are wall-to-wall carpeted hardwood on a layer of wood sheeting above accessible basement/crawl space, so that's possible as well. But none of this is going to happen anytime soon. Having it done professionally would push costs beyond any possible savings. In a few years I'll be retired and then I'll have plenty of time for such projects, not to mention even more insulating. The important thing for now is to get the holes bored, the loops installed and a system in place, before the tax credits expire. Hence my interest in a radiator-based system, where the only costs would be the loops and the heat pump.

    Anyone know what the Carrier 50YEW costs?
  • 01-28-2013, 09:12 AM
    motoguy128
    Lower water temps are going to be more effcienct for both a mod-con as well as a goethermal water to water. The lower the better on the load return temps. By 140F, you're looking at 120+ return temps and pushing the limits of most units.

    That being said, if your a home that was "well radiated" and you've made thermal envelope improvments, you might be suprised that 140 or even 120F water can actually heat it. My 1920's home originally had enough steam radiator capacity to supply the home with about 300k BTU's (total EDR is around 1400 if i did my calcs right). Actual heat loss is around 65k BTU's now at design, so even 120F water could almost get it done with so much EDR. The main steam supply header looks like 4" with a 2" condensate return... all pipe perfectly sloped back towards the boiler.
  • 01-24-2013, 11:46 PM
    nym1975
    A low temperature heating system like radiant floors is a very efficient way to heat the house. Most hot water recirc systems need 180 degree F water, radiant can comfortably heat the house with 100 degree water. It's a gentler, more even, more comfortable heat than forced hot water or forced hot air.
  • 01-24-2013, 07:00 AM
    waterpirate
    I am going to be the voice of reason and experiance here. If you have the patience and monies to be your own beta tester, and live with the results, go for it. If not the latter, get off the internet and get a local pro to elp you out.

    A combo geo unit is not designed for radiator/register use, because of it's inability to produce mass btu's when needed. A buffer tank wil not solve that puzzle, just help it. Hydronics and geo are done with in slab typically. You then have the "mass " to be slow and even to match the geo output.
    For a retro fit water to air traditional is your best choice. If you want to maintain your aesthetics, you could leave your boiler and maybe reduce your tonnage to only your cooling load and use the boiler to cover the other % of your heating load.
    Again, you really need boots on the ground to help you figure it out.
    Eric
  • 01-23-2013, 03:43 AM
    LarryF
    I've been looking into this new 50YEW model as well. I've been think of going geo for years but I'd hate to have to give up my radiators for forced air, which probably wouldn't work very well anyway as all the vents would be in the ceiling. Fortunately a lot of these older systems are way over the needed capacity. I've got 10 big cast iron radiators and if you calculate the capacity at 180º it's over 100,000 Btu/hr. When I moved in it was set at 195º, so capacity would have been more like 115,000, which is what the boiler can put out. All this for a 1300 sf 1-story house. It had single-pane steel casement windows and bare steel heating pipes running through unheated crawl spaces, so the losses must have been tremendous. A lot of insulating has been done since then. I've cranked the boiler down to 160º but even so on really cold nights it might go on 2 or 3 times for 25-30 minutes. So I've still got a lot of spare capacity and I'm sure 140º, which should yield 69% of the capacity at 160º, would be adequate, if these new geo units can really do that. I'd be concerned that in really cold climates a sustained bout of cold weather could get the EWT down to the 30º range, sapping both capacity and efficiency. But here in central Virginia, that's now very rare, we might get a few nights in the teens, but then a few days later it's back near 60º highs. So in principle it should work fine. During cold snaps when you need 140º heat I might only get COP of 2 or so, but most of the time I'd be running 120º or 130º so COP might be more like 3 or even 4. My question is, do I really need a buffer tank when I've got 10 big old radiators worth of thermal mass? That must be the equivalent of a 40-gallon tank, at least. Space in the half-basement is at a premium, especially if I leave the oil-fired boiler in for backup.
  • 12-29-2011, 11:55 AM
    jpb2
    Though not the best application I have used water to water with fin tube radiant and have had no problems. Milder climate here and used a 5 ton 2 stage with stage 2 locked out in the cooling mode
  • 12-29-2011, 10:59 AM
    mseng
    Generally a heat pump will not put out enough hot water in a short period of time to keep up with the heat loss of a home, if you just want to put in floor heating of a small room say a bathroom it could work otherwise I would not advise it. It can supply the hot water for 2 people dishes and baths if the ambient is 20 degrees or lower.
  • 10-01-2011, 08:31 AM
    skeller

    Geo for hyronics

    You can use Geo for hydronics. You just have to find one made for it. If you just use a water to water unit, you will have to have to make sure that your btu output on your unit, for heating is the same as your btu out on your baseboard heaters. Hydron module units, which have the highest heating outputs and the best warranties, have a combo unit that does forced air and heat and hydronics. And it shouldn't cost you a fortune to get a Geo. I'm installing 8 ton in a 7000 sq ft house for $30,000. The electric company is giving him a $750 a ton rebate back. If you need any further help just give me a shout at kellerhvac@gmail.com.
  • 09-08-2011, 10:04 PM
    aaronforprez
    My first concern is that you may need 3 of these geos to make this work.
    Would you spend $50,000 on enough geo and loops to heat the radiators versus $5000 on a new electric boiler?
    $45,000 payback would take a long time considering you are only saving 50% on your utility bills over the electric boiler. (2.1 COP versus a 1.0 COP of an electric boiler)

    this was an off the hip assessment, but i thought i would offer it anyways.
  • 09-04-2011, 08:01 PM
    xpuser357
    Howdy in my opinion hydronics and geo are two different systems. hydronics is what you would apply on your baseboard heaters, Boiler to heat water and pump to circulate hot water.
    Geo has Heat pump with, if ordered hot water for domestic hot water. through loop inside unit that hot gas from compressor heats, besides it`s other operation is to heat the air and blow into ductwork. Or cool depending what owner has selected at stat. But hot water is generated heat or cool.
  • 09-04-2011, 07:30 PM
    wcm

    Geothermal for Baseboard Heating

    All the posts I've seen so far for Geothermal for Baseboard Heating have been pretty negative, but none have mentioned the Carrier/Bryant gt-pw water-to-water (50yew). This seems to be advertised as a boiler for hydronic use. It's specs are 140deg water with 32 deg EWT at 2.1 COP or 2.5 at 50deg EWT. 140 deg water will deliver about half the BTU's as 180 deg water but in my case I have cast iron baseboard on almost the entire perimeter of each floor so that it is somewhat oversized. Cast iron also has at least 5 times the contact area of finned copper pipe, so it would seem that it would perform better at lower temperatures and flow rates.
    This unit is expensive and I obviously don't want a failed experiment, so I would appreciate any comments and analysis.

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •