Post a reply to the thread: Heat Pump, After major burnout.
You may choose an icon for your message from this list
Please enter the name by which you would like to log-in and be known on this site.
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Will turn www.example.com into [URL]http://www.example.com[/URL].
trane used one way driers in the units that have the check valve in the xe units they have one drier in the xl they have 2 ,on the newer units that dont have the check valve they use a biflow drier . sounds like you found what killed the compressor
I had a bad burn this summer on a trane HP and got handed a one way drier and said....hey this ain't right. Trane said its correct we want drier back in oem spot before OD txv. I say ok and took drier put in back of van. Guess they didn't think it would be a problem to not run freon through drier until winter. I installed suction line hh core and liquid hh cord biflow and oil was still slightly acidic after 2-3 hrs but came up neutral after 24 hrs.
I didn't see the hpc in the post i assumed just regular 163 my appologies to the op
An RV stuck in the middle will cause the head and vapor pressures to be the same while the compressor runs. can also cause the comp to over heat and eventually fail. 163S is just the size of filter, and sweat connection indication, weather bi flo or not the designation doesn't tell you.
I think that if we had our druthers, we would have simply got a new condenser unit rather than remove the old copper filter-drier, the reversing valve, maybe the TXV, and the compressor. But the owner didn't want to pay for anything but the most basic of labor, and we couldn't guarantee him that anything was wrong except the compressor. I don't believe he was interested in likelihoods. Our senior tech agreed that the no orifice was the likely killer. It did last for eight years without raising any eyebrows. Over the years, our company has evidently done a bunch of compressor burnouts without having to do the much more expensive suction line filter drier additions and removals, and everything worked out fine from most accounts. It is hard to tell the customer that they will need all of that extra work a couple of weeks down the road so we don't try. Like I said, they have managed thus far even though in an ideal world, the recommendation would be otherwise.
Originally Posted by crazzycajun A 163s drier how about a bi flow not your main problem however I thought the 163S was simply the 4-ton, 3/8 inch, sweat, and then it came in uni- and bi-flow?
One of the problems dealing with heat pumps is that there is no way to know if the RV if good without a good running compressor. I got in the habit of whenever a compressor goes bad to tell the customer that there is always a possibility of a bad RV that caused the problem but no way to be sure until the compressor is replaced. There's always other possible causes of the compressor damage but an RV is the one I fear the most.
Originally Posted by georgelass This compressor was a warranty replacment. I didn't talk to Trane but I'm sure our boss would have gladly accepted a reversing valve were it offered. The owner was not interested in paying for anything that wasn't absolutely necessary. So the compressor was under warranty but the RV was not? I would have stated in the quote that the RV should be replaced and that a suction line filter drier must be installed at a minimum. Also state several filter drier changes may be needed and after start up that all valves(TXV, check) will be tested for proper operation and recommendations made if replacement is needed. No orifice is what caused the compressor failure. Good luck, add that suction line filter drier when you replace the reversing valve.
A 163s drier how about a bi flow not your main problem however
You might have some clogged check valves and filter driers if they weren't changed too.
Sounds like when you find the problem , you will then know WHY the compressor went bad in the first place ....
I had my gauges low-side on suction and high-side on liquid...service valves as one would with typical a/c. No, I didn't actually write down the pressures. Hot pipes were the top one and the two on the left. The one on the right, I believe it went to the evap coil, it was about ambient. I didn't put a thermocouple on any of them. I've seen a cutaway of reversing valves. I understand they need the pressure to make them switch, that the solenoid just opens/closes the little tubes. This compressor was a warranty replacment. I didn't talk to Trane but I'm sure our boss would have gladly accepted a reversing valve were it offered. The owner was not interested in paying for anything that wasn't absolutely necessary. So the gauges not budging could be blamed entirely on the reversing valve? The check valves are not a concern? Thank you.
Rev valves can be damaged during compressor failure. Believe it or not compressor manufacture actually recommends new accumulator and Rev valve on every burn.
Which pipes were hot? Where were your gauges attached? Also I have seen a system operate without a piston or txv before. Pressures and temps look like crap but it will cool. There is enough pressure drop across the distributor tubes and through the coil to get refrigeration. Sometimes if you get a strong enough magnet you can force that valve to shift. You also might try stopping the fans to get your pressure up and force that valve to seat on its own. I don't know your experience level, but are you familiar with the internals of these valves and how they function?
Heat Pump, After major burnout. I've already posted two questions about heat pumps this weekend, so I know I'm pushing my luck, perhaps squeezing the good-nature of the helpful forum veterans. Sorry, but this one may save some more pain. We have a Trane heat pump. Major compressor burnout. The thing even blew a hole through one of the electrical terminals at the compressor. Very stinky. Compressor was changed. Evap coil was changed. It had a big leak and a bunch of fins were dissolved--nobody really can figure that one out. Changed the compressor, of course. As stated in earlier post, little filter-drier was removed and big blue 163S was put on the liquid line. Much, much purging with nitrogen. Used the acid-neutralizer stuff for good measure and superstition. Put on gauges, start unit in cooling. Gauges don't budge. Check reversing valve. 24 V at wires to solenoid. Remove wires. Add. Remove. Add. Rap on reversing valve body with large crescent. Clicks but no wooshing. Three of the four reversing valve appendages were very warm. Fourth closer to ambient of maybe 53 F. Based on my assumption that a max of two appendages should be warm, I concluded the reversing valve is bad. We will schedule a replacement pursuant to senior tech approval. My question is whether even with such major reversing valve failure, could THAT account for the gauges not budging the needles, or should we also suspect check valves are stuck open? (In case you haven't seen my recent posts, you should know that I don't have experience with such problems on heat pumps, that I'm only going with what I've read.) One more possibly relevant point. The outside unit has a TXV. When we changed the inside coil, we noted it did NOT, absolutely, no mistake, did NOT have an orifice. The coil installation instructions and Trane Help-line both said it SHOULD have an orifice and specified its location. We obtained and installed the orifice. Senior tech said he did not know how it could have functioned without an orifice. We did not ever observe operation of the unit prior to the burnout, so we can't say how it functioned, good or bad. Is the reversing valve replacement likely to bring total success? Thank you all.
Heat Pump, After major burnout.
Forum Rules