Reply to Thread

Post a reply to the thread: Trane varitrac III and Jace

Your Message

 
 

You may choose an icon for your message from this list

Register Now

Please enter the name by which you would like to log-in and be known on this site.

Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Log-in

Additional Options

  • Will turn www.example.com into [URL]http://www.example.com[/URL].

Topic Review (Newest First)

  • 05-10-2013, 10:29 PM
    controldude
    Varitrac isn't (comm5) or Lon the interface between the Tracker and Varitrac is Lon and any other devices outside of the Varitrac system are also Lon ie: other stand alone rtu's, mp503's, and so on.
  • 04-26-2013, 11:10 PM
    tlp261
    Can't you eliminate the CCP and just bring the dampers and RTU into the Jace via Lon if Comm5 or a driver if Comm4? And can anyone tell me when Varitrac became Comm 5 instead of Comm 4?
  • 02-09-2013, 05:58 PM
    controldude
    Thank You mallron
  • 02-09-2013, 12:54 PM
    mallron
    Quote Originally Posted by mechdorn View Post
    What does that mean? It's 2013 not 2003. The Reliatell unit controller was never intended for integration either. Guess what, I can purchase a LON board or a BACnet board for it today. Why not do the same for the CCPIII. Just rip me off like Trane does with everything else and let me pass onto the end user.
    #1-cool your jets

    #2-think about what you just said, if you can get a LON board for the unit then it WAS intended for integration.

    #3-Trane does not offer a LON or BACnet option for the CCPIII because it's firmware/hardware does not support them because...drum roll please....IT WAS NEVER INTENDED FOR INTEGRATION!!!!!!!!

    #4-That's what it means.
  • 02-08-2013, 10:08 PM
    mechdorn
    Quote Originally Posted by mallron View Post
    never intended for integration either.
    What does that mean? It's 2013 not 2003. The Reliatell unit controller was never intended for integration either. Guess what, I can purchase a LON board or a BACnet board for it today. Why not do the same for the CCPIII. Just rip me off like Trane does with everything else and let me pass onto the end user.
  • 02-08-2013, 09:39 PM
    mallron
    Quote Originally Posted by mechdorn View Post
    No integration = no CCPIII. That's the building owner, can't blame him.
    That's cool, but the VAV's were never intended for integration either.
  • 02-08-2013, 08:08 PM
    mechdorn
    Quote Originally Posted by controldude View Post
    CCPIII was never intended for integration!
    No integration = no CCPIII. That's the building owner, can't blame him.
  • 02-08-2013, 07:30 PM
    chadtech
    Quote Originally Posted by controldude View Post
    CCPIII was never intended for integration!
    And that is a sham, because it is a pretty good zone control panel. Way to go Trane!
  • 02-07-2013, 02:57 AM
    controldude
    CCPIII was never intended for integration!
  • 02-06-2013, 07:57 PM
    mechdorn

    Trane varitrac III and Jace

    It's been a couple years since my last attempt at this. It was a total disaster last time, was wondering if any improvements with newer revisions to each component. I used the Trane LNML file provided by Tridium last time, all I got was a bunch of unusable data. Any input appreciated.

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •