View Full Version : Ports and Arabs
frozensolid
02-25-2006, 08:48 AM
Bush should just appoint Osama as director of homeland security and get it over with.
All the zombie right wingers will fall right in line.
mattm
02-25-2006, 08:53 AM
They can ramble on all they want about how much this group is one of our greatest allies over there and hoe safe we will be and no need to worry blah blah blah. But what about America being owned by America and patriotism. I think it stinks no matter how you wrap it up and perfume it.
Special Ed
02-25-2006, 08:54 AM
This whining lib thread belongs in the ARP.
mattm
02-25-2006, 08:57 AM
Waaaaa. Who cares. I'm sure it'll get moved soon enough :D
Special Ed
02-25-2006, 09:00 AM
Geez, & to think I came to the GD area to get away from politics!
frozensolid
02-25-2006, 09:01 AM
Maybe Bush has a plan, appoint osama to homeland sec. Then send him hunting with dick.
This ain't politics its common sense. Big Difference.
Originally posted by mattm
Waaaaa. Who cares. I'm sure it'll get moved soon enough :D
Who cares? LOL
Where is my stapler you mean.
mattm
02-25-2006, 09:02 AM
I was just messing with ya SE.
James 3528
02-25-2006, 09:03 AM
You bed wetters that beached about searching a arab at the airport and wanting the 80 year old lady searched instead and then beached about listening to calls from the middle east to here, are now beachen about this? Interesting.
Now who's a Zombie?
Special Ed
02-25-2006, 09:04 AM
Originally posted by mattm
I was just messing with ya SE.
Yeah, I know. I saw the :D.
frozensolid
02-25-2006, 09:04 AM
Eddie alert!!!!!!!!!!!
James 3528
02-25-2006, 09:07 AM
Originally posted by frozensolid
Maybe Bush has a plan, appoint osama to homeland sec. Then send him hunting with dick.
This ain't politics its common sense. Big Difference. When did someone tell you what common sense was? If you had any you would know that there are about 5 threads in the ARP section on this subject.I don't call you FrozenSkull for nothing
Originally posted by frozensolid
Eddie alert!!!!!!!!!!!
You're still frozen between your ears Ice Cube
Is everyone Eat Feddy now?
:)
Special Ed
02-25-2006, 09:09 AM
You're right....
~L~ does look suspicious. Look up his profile. Location is Terra, no e-mail address where the little red house is.... Veeeery suspicious, indeed!
frozensolid
02-25-2006, 09:10 AM
James you are so smart.
Special Ed
02-25-2006, 09:10 AM
Especially after his latest post.
James 3528
02-25-2006, 09:11 AM
Mods, lock Marty down so we don't lose sight of what a goof FrozenSkull is.
James 3528
02-25-2006, 09:13 AM
Originally posted by James 3528
Originally posted by frozensolid
Maybe Bush has a plan, appoint osama to homeland sec. Then send him hunting with dick.
This ain't politics its common sense. Big Difference. When did someone tell you what common sense was? If you had any you would know that there are about 5 threads in the ARP section on this subject.I don't call you FrozenSkull for nothing
Originally posted by frozensolid
James you are so smart.
Just wondering when you are gonna get that way ;)
frozensolid
02-25-2006, 09:15 AM
Originally posted by James 3528
Mods, lock Marty down so we don't lose sight of what a goof FrozenSkull is.
I may be a goof with no common sense, but at least I can think for myself. Go Bar B Que a penis.
frozensolid
02-25-2006, 09:18 AM
Typical James, can't find a intelligent response. Get personal.
James 3528
02-25-2006, 09:23 AM
Originally posted by frozensolid
Typical James, can't find a intelligent response. Get personal.
I think I nailed your sides agenda. Don't monitor phone calls, don't profile Arabs at the airport but cry like a baby about this and Cheney's hunting accident. If you want to say something about THAT Skull, then put your goofy fingers to the keyboard.
You guys kiss and make up... ghezzzzz
frozensolid
02-25-2006, 09:28 AM
I have no side nor agenda, I have a love of liberty. Also I believe in that little thing called, you know, the Constitution.
frozensolid
02-25-2006, 09:29 AM
If James needs a kiss? Call robo :D.
James 3528
02-25-2006, 09:31 AM
Originally posted by frozensolid
I have no side nor agenda, I have a love of liberty. Also I believe in that little thing called, you know, the Constitution.
Yeah, sure. You're a little to the left of Ted Kennedy who also has no side, agenda or brains left
frozensolid
02-25-2006, 09:37 AM
Originally posted by James 3528
Originally posted by frozensolid
I have no side nor agenda, I have a love of liberty. Also I believe in that little thing called, you know, the Constitution.
Yeah, sure. You're a little to the left of Ted Kennedy who also has no side, agenda or brains left
I guess I spent too much time in the sixties. I would love to stay and play james, but I have work to do. Later.
James 3528
02-25-2006, 09:41 AM
Yes, and I would love to sharpen my sword uppon your back side some more ;)
Special Ed
02-25-2006, 09:42 AM
Like a true Dem, James, he's runnin' from the fight.
James 3528
02-25-2006, 09:47 AM
Originally posted by Special Ed
Like a true Dem, James, he's runnin' from the fight.
That's alright. :p Cleaning off my sword now......getting ready, watching for another flare up of stupidity. ;)
coolwhip
02-25-2006, 09:50 AM
Towell head ports on are east coast. I think are president fell asleep at the helm. If this country doesnt get its $hit together, there might be a civil war here.
James 3528
02-25-2006, 09:55 AM
For the record, I don't like the Port thing. It stinks. I said that in the ARP section. But I don't like searching 80 year old women instead of Arabs and I do like electronically monitoring phone calls from the middle east.
And what I like less than anything are Americans that cry about searching a Arabs at the airport, listening to those phone calls that are a clear and present threat and then turn around and complain about this Port thing while bringing up the Constitution. They are nothing but phonies.
[Edited by JAMES 3528 on 02-25-2006 at 09:58 AM]
mattm
02-25-2006, 10:48 AM
Originally posted by frozensolid
Eddie alert!!!!!!!!!!!
~L~ is far from being Eddy.
**NOTE: I think ??
[Edited by mattm on 02-25-2006 at 10:55 AM]
Originally posted by mattm
Originally posted by frozensolid
Eddie alert!!!!!!!!!!!
~L~ is far from being Eddy.
**NOTE: I think ??
[Edited by mattm on 02-25-2006 at 10:55 AM]
Give that man a Cigar
You give him the ****'n cigar... are you nuts!
He thinks you can't find a stapler.. YA Putz
mattm
02-25-2006, 11:35 AM
Welcome new member. ~L~ :D :D
geerair
02-25-2006, 12:05 PM
Originally posted by James 3528
For the record, I don't like the Port thing. It stinks. I said that in the ARP section. But I don't like searching 80 year old women instead of Arabs They search both. Obviously it has been a while since you went through airport security. Of course cutting edge security technology at Brunswick International Airport and Feedstore consists of a dowsing rod.
and I do like electronically monitoring phone calls from the middle east.Me too. Although why Bush has to trash the Constitution in the process is baffling.
And what I like less than anything are Americans that cry about searching a Arabs at the airport, listening to those phone calls that are a clear and present threat and then turn around and complain about this Port thing while bringing up the Constitution. They are nothing but phonies. Strawman.
James 3528
02-25-2006, 12:19 PM
Originally posted by geerair
Originally posted by James 3528
For the record, I don't like the Port thing. It stinks. I said that in the ARP section. But I don't like searching 80 year old women instead of Arabs They search both. Obviously it has been a while since you went through airport security. Of course cutting edge security technology at Brunswick International Airport and Feedstore consists of a dowsing rod.
and I do like electronically monitoring phone calls from the middle east.Me too. Although why Bush has to trash the Constitution in the process is baffling.
And what I like less than anything are Americans that cry about searching a Arabs at the airport, listening to those phone calls that are a clear and present threat and then turn around and complain about this Port thing while bringing up the Constitution. They are nothing but phonies. Strawman.
Haha...You couldn't pick a worst example to get stupid on. ..BQK airport is the fly in and out for the Federal Law Enforcement Training Centers (simple google searches) operations which is visible from their front door and used as a actual real world trainer for Customs and many more agencies. It also happens to be one of the largest runways on the east coast. It also has a 2 Air Force Squadrons based near the end of the runway. So I guess this little oversight on your parts makes the rest of your ramblings worthless as usual. Another hill Geer died on.
geerair
02-25-2006, 12:22 PM
Originally posted by James 3528
Haha...You couldn't pick a worst example to get stupid on. ..BQK airport is the fly in and out for the Federal Law Enforcement Training Centers (simple google searches) operations which is visible from their front door and used as a actual real world trainer for Customs and many more agencies. It also happens to be one of the largest runways on the east coast. It also has a 2 Air Force Squadrons based near the end of the runway. So I guess this little oversight on your parts makes the rest of your ramblings worthless as usual. Another hill Geer died on. Yes, I'm sure the feedstore is booming.
James 3528
02-25-2006, 12:23 PM
Google it dummy.
James 3528
02-25-2006, 12:29 PM
Note on the syudents page words like "Counter Terrorism"
http://www.fletc.gov/student.htm#Brunswick%20Golden%20Isles%20Airport%2 0(BQK)
Brunswick Golden Isles Airport (BQK)
All students traveling to the FLETC by commercial air are encouraged to route their travel into the Brunswick Golden Isles Airport. The Brunswick Golden Isles Airport is conveniently located adjacent to the FLETC. When making your reservations, please refer to the destination as BRUNSWICK (BQK). The FLETC will provide ground transportation to and from the Center for each flight at the Brunswick Golden Isles Airport, if PRIOR arrangements have been made.
Delta and Atlantic Southeast Airlines (ASA) provide round-trip connections to the Atlanta Hartsfield International Airport. Effective February 10, 2002, this service will be via regional jet. The aircraft being utilized is a 50-passenger jet known for safety, comfort and convenience. It can fly over 500 miles per hour at altitudes as high as 41,000 feet. A flight into Brunswick should reduce the time waiting in airports for connecting flights and bus transportation.
frozensolid
02-25-2006, 12:31 PM
James I have been devastated by you witty sword. The wounds are to great to be healed. You sir are a megalomaniac.
Sp ed the dems are the ones who fight, the repubs are the ones with five deferments and daddies who hide them out in the guard.
I do not post in arp because of people like ya all. In this case I made an exception, so I could respectfully ask you both to go F yourselves.
P.S. I will never see you responses so have fun. Men of honor and character do not act like you.
[Edited by frozensolid on 02-25-2006 at 12:33 PM]
James 3528
02-25-2006, 12:45 PM
pifffff
geerair
02-25-2006, 01:05 PM
Originally posted by James 3528
Note on the syudents page words like "Counter Terrorism"
http://www.fletc.gov/student.htm#Brunswick%20Golden%20Isles%20Airport%2 0(BQK)
Brunswick Golden Isles Airport (BQK)
All students traveling to the FLETC by commercial air are encouraged to route their travel into the Brunswick Golden Isles Airport. The Brunswick Golden Isles Airport is conveniently located adjacent to the FLETC. When making your reservations, please refer to the destination as BRUNSWICK (BQK). The FLETC will provide ground transportation to and from the Center for each flight at the Brunswick Golden Isles Airport, if PRIOR arrangements have been made.
Delta and Atlantic Southeast Airlines (ASA) provide round-trip connections to the Atlanta Hartsfield International Airport. Effective February 10, 2002, this service will be via regional jet. The aircraft being utilized is a 50-passenger jet known for safety, comfort and convenience. It can fly over 500 miles per hour at altitudes as high as 41,000 feet. A flight into Brunswick should reduce the time waiting in airports for connecting flights and bus transportation.The operational word here is regional.
James 3528
02-25-2006, 01:13 PM
The word is that you're a dumbass
rob10
02-25-2006, 02:44 PM
Originally posted by frozensolid
Bush should just appoint Osama as director of homeland security and get it over with.
All the zombie right wingers will fall right in line. 2 THUMBS UP ON THIS POST!!!
rob10
02-25-2006, 02:46 PM
Originally posted by frozensolid
If James needs a kiss? Call robo :D. He can call Dice!! :D :D
geerair
02-25-2006, 04:58 PM
Originally posted by rob10
Originally posted by frozensolid
Bush should just appoint Osama as director of homeland security and get it over with.
All the zombie right wingers will fall right in line. 2 THUMBS UP ON THIS POST!!! Yeah that is good. Sadly, it has a more than a grain of truth in it.
MadeinUSA
02-25-2006, 08:03 PM
Originally posted by frozensolid
Sp ed the dems are the ones who fight, the repubs are the ones with five deferments and daddies who hide them out in the guard.If your worthless past president would have had the balls to fight, we would not be in this situation you idiot.
He had a chance to fight for eight years and chose not to, just like he was too big of a pussy back in the 60's to even register and serve his country.
Carter and Clinton. These are the last two pussies in office to not stand up for the United States of America. Now tell me again how your ladies who wear skirts fight.
hvac r us 2
02-26-2006, 08:42 AM
Originally posted by madeinusa
Originally posted by frozensolid
Sp ed the dems are the ones who fight, the repubs are the ones with five deferments and daddies who hide them out in the guard.If your worthless past president would have had the balls to fight, we would not be in this situation you idiot.
He had a chance to fight for eight years and chose not to, just like he was too big of a pussy back in the 60's to even register and serve his country.
Seriously, when are you people going to live in the present century and stop blaming others for Bush's utter and complete failures?
The situation we are in with Iraq was entirely created by Bush chasing phantom weapons of mass destruction. Everybody in world new there wasn’t anything there...except Bush.
When Saddam said he had no weapons of mass destruction, he was telling the truth...the Bush administration was the ones lying.
Bush had a complete lack of strategic and postwar planning to secure oil-related sites, prevent chaos and mayhem and ensure a lawful and organized transition after the collapse of Saddam Hussein's government. This failure continues and this man still can't even offer a plan to resolve the chaotic situation the US military faces in Iraq. All this despite the fact that declassified government documents reveal that Bush was warned time and time again about these possible consequences.
"We need to fight them there, instead of here" another Bush diversion tactic to avoid the truth. Terrorism is up three fold in the world. And need I remind anybody the terrorist that attacked on 911 were already here, not there.
Just a matter of time before we are attacked again. Nothing is more secure; the Bush group missed the warnings before and most likely will miss them again.
Missing the 9/11 threat and calling it unforeseeable despite a memo provided to him in August of 2001 titled "Bin Laden Determined to Strike in U.S" and ample warnings that a threat was imminent from the moment he took office. (Note commission report: "Some commission members said the administration was given enough information about bin Laden's intentions and capabilities to have warned the public that an attack was possible")
Shall we discuss the world record deficit numbers Bush has created? What administration is responsible for this I wonder?
I have never seen an administration put so much blame on others, amazing, just amazing.
Bush is leading us to the brink of national, economic and moral bankruptcy and disaster.
James 3528
02-26-2006, 08:59 AM
"The situation we are in with Iraq was entirely created by Bush chasing phantom weapons of mass destruction. Everybody in world new there wasn’t anything there...except Bush."
Really. Uuuummmm Do you have any idea who used and coined the term "Weapons of Mass Destruction" and bombed Iraq because of that reason? No, I would think you don't
When Saddam said he had no weapons of mass destruction, he was telling the truth...the Bush administration was the ones lying.
Really? Are you this stupid?
"We need to fight them there, instead of here" another Bush diversion tactic to avoid the truth. Terrorism is up three fold in the world. And need I remind anybody the terrorist that attacked on 911 were already here, not there.
Just a matter of time before we are attacked again. Nothing is more secure; the Bush group missed the warnings before and most likely will miss them again. Missing the 9/11 threat and calling it unforeseeable despite a memo provided to him in August of 2001 titled "Bin Laden Determined to Strike in U.S" and ample warnings that a threat was imminent from the moment he took office. (Note commission report: "Some commission members said the administration was given enough information about bin Laden's intentions and capabilities to have warned the public that an attack was possible")
Name one attack on US soil since 911 directly linked to Al Queda. Need you remind us of what? The money trail went back there as well as where they came from and need I remind you they were here during Clinton's watch and had already hit the WTC once. Was that a warning , Einstein? Or the USS Cole? Did Clinton miss those memo's and the dismantling of our intelligence network that took years to build ?
If you want to worry about something, worry about the missile and war head technology that left this country and went to China during Willie's watch
Here is some extra reading on the subject. Some dates as you can see are after 911. Don't give me the shet that the Intel was changed for them. You can't keep that many people quite in the Intel community now adays. Mainly because it was wrecked by democrats such as Jimmy , Amy Carter and Willie.
"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line." --President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998
"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program." --President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998
"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face." --Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998
"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983." --Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998
"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs." Letter to President Clinton, signed by: -- Democratic Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others, Oct. 9, 1998
"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process." -Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998
"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies." -- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999
"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies." Letter to President Bush, Signed by: -- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), and others, Dec 5, 2001
"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e means of delivering them." -- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002
"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country." -- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power." -- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction." -- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002
"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..." -- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002
"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security." -- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002
"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction." -- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002
"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do" -- Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002
"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons." -- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002
"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction." -- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002
"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..." -- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003
[Edited by JAMES 3528 on 02-26-2006 at 09:02 AM]
hvac r us 2
02-26-2006, 01:15 PM
Interesting reading James, used out of context, not exactly accurate...but never the less interesting.
There is not one of those items that can’t be rebutted, but does it really matter? Your going to defend "your party" while looking through rose colored glasses anyways.
I am not going to take the time and dissect your "cut and paste" like many of your ARP cronies, don’t have the time or the patience. Why put myself through listening to your henchmen’s name-calling and delusional rants. And besides, would it matter? (See above)
The Bush administration is a disgrace to the Republican Party, I know it, you know it, and you just can’t accept it.
I can identify the shortcomings of this administration regardless if they are Republican or Democrat, as it should be.
geerair
02-26-2006, 04:59 PM
Originally posted by madeinusa
If your worthless past president would have had the balls to fight, we would not be in this situation you idiot.
He had a chance to fight for eight years and chose not to, just like he was too big of a pussy back in the 60's to even register and serve his country.
Carter and Clinton. These are the last two pussies in office to not stand up for the United States of America. Now tell me again how your ladies who wear skirts fight.Blah, blah, blah.
Let's review Bush's fighting:
Incidents of terrorism doubled in 2003, tripled in 2004 and increased even more in 2005
2300 killed, 16,000 wounded and maimed, Billions of dollars pissed away, stolen, or just lost with the result being chaos and civil war in Iraq
Bin Laden still not captured
The Taliban are resurgent in Afghanistan
At home, a majority of citizens believe Bush's vanity war was a mistake
The country is divided
Civil Liberties are being eroded
Dissent is being supressed
Thanks Shrub and the mindless groupies who voted for you.
bootlen
02-26-2006, 09:04 PM
Originally posted by geerair
Originally posted by madeinusa
If your worthless past president would have had the balls to fight, we would not be in this situation you idiot.
He had a chance to fight for eight years and chose not to, just like he was too big of a pussy back in the 60's to even register and serve his country.
Carter and Clinton. These are the last two pussies in office to not stand up for the United States of America. Now tell me again how your ladies who wear skirts fight. Blah, blah, blah.
Let's review Bush's fighting:
Incidents of terrorism doubled in 2003, tripled in 2004 and increased even more in 2005
Nah, it didn't.
2300 killed, 16,000 wounded and maimed, Billions of dollars pissed away, stolen, or just lost with the result being chaos and civil war in Iraq
Not true.
Bin Laden still not captured
Not a primary objective.
The Taliban are resurgent in Afghanistan
Nah, they're not.
At home, a majority of citizens believe Bush's vanity war was a mistake
Nah, they don't.
The country is divided
Nah, it's not.
Civil Liberties are being eroded
Nah, they're not.
Dissent is being supressed
Laughable.
Thanks Shrub and the mindful groupies who voted for you.
Yer welcome.
geerair
02-26-2006, 11:30 PM
Originally posted by bootlen
Incidents of terrorism doubled in 2003, tripled in 2004 and increased even more in 2005
Nah, it didn't.Check with Bush's State Department. They have the bloody details.
]2300 killed, 16,000 wounded and maimed, Billions of dollars pissed away, stolen, or just lost with the result being chaos and civil war in Iraq
Not true.Head in sand syndrome.
Bin Laden still not captured
Not a primary objective.Bush on Osama: "I want justice. And there's an old poster out West that says Wanted,Dead or Alive." 9/17/01
The Taliban are resurgent in Afghanistan
Nah, they're not.Current events avoidance syndrome
At home, a majority of citizens believe Bush's vanity war was a mistake
Nah, they don't.62% say differently
The country is divided
Nah, it's not.On further consideration, the numbers do in fact point to a union of those opposed to Bush. Well, at least that is one thing he didn't lie about.
Civil Liberties are being eroded
Nah, they're not.As we write in fact.
Dissent is being supressed
LaughableBush has thin skin. His feelings are easily hurt.
Thanks Shrub and the mindless groupies who voted for you.
Yer welcome. Recognized yourself at last.
bootlen
02-26-2006, 11:46 PM
Originally posted by geerair
Originally posted by bootlen
Incidents of terrorism doubled in 2003, tripled in 2004 and increased even more in 2005
Nah, it didn't.Check with Bush's State Department. They have the bloody details.
]2300 killed, 16,000 wounded and maimed, Billions of dollars pissed away, stolen, or just lost with the result being chaos and civil war in Iraq
Not true.Head in sand syndrome.
Bin Laden still not captured
Not a primary objective.Bush on Osama: "I want justice. And there's an old poster out West that says Wanted,Dead or Alive." 9/17/01
The Taliban are resurgent in Afghanistan
Nah, they're not.Current events avoidance syndrome
At home, a majority of citizens believe Bush's vanity war was a mistake
Nah, they don't.62% say differently
The country is divided
Nah, it's not.On further consideration, the numbers do in fact point to a union of those opposed to Bush. Well, at least that is one thing he didn't lie about.
Civil Liberties are being eroded
Nah, they're not.As we write in fact.
Dissent is being supressed
LaughableBush has thin skin. His feelings are easily hurt.
Thanks Shrub and the mindful groupies who voted for you.
Yer welcome. Recognized yourself at last.
Nah-ah.
So pull yer head out.
Still not primary objective.
Same as it always has been.
Puppets, repeaters, ignoramuses. You know the type. One lives in your mirror.
Yeah. Lotta Muslims floating around.
Name just one person hwo has had his right seroded except by a misguided lib justice.
Haven't really noticed.
Me? I thought the same about you. Check the mirror once more. Which one are you?
MadeinUSA
02-27-2006, 01:19 AM
Originally posted by hvac r us 2
Originally posted by madeinusa
Originally posted by frozensolid
Sp ed the dems are the ones who fight, the repubs are the ones with five deferments and daddies who hide them out in the guard.If your worthless past president would have had the balls to fight, we would not be in this situation you idiot.
He had a chance to fight for eight years and chose not to, just like he was too big of a pussy back in the 60's to even register and serve his country.
The situation we are in with Iraq was entirely created by Bush chasing phantom weapons of mass destruction. Everybody in world new there wasn’t anything there...except Bush. You are surely some sort of special ignorant. The President merely said the same things, based on the same intelligence that had been said by YOUR party since 1998.
The threat was so bad in 1998 that we bombed Iraq for three days after they threw out the UN inspectors.
If EVERYONE knew that Saddam had not weapons, why did the UN want inspectors in Iraq?
If EVERYONE knew that Saddam had not weapons, why did the Congress authorize the President to use all necessary force in Iraq?
If EVERYONE knew that Saddam had not weapons, why did the UN pass 17 resolutions calling for Saddam to disarm? Why was UN Resolution 1441 passed threatening the use of force to disarm him?
If you believe what you say, it is obvious that you will not be voting for "Hanoi" Kerry or "Lost Rose Law Firm Documents" Clinton in the 2008 election. But, personally, I think you are a liar.
"If we fail to respond today, Saddam and all those who would follow in his footsteps will be emboldened tomorrow." "Some day, some way, I guarantee you, he'll use the arsenal." What if Saddam Hussein "fails to comply, and we fail to act, or we take some ambiguous third route which gives him yet more opportunities to develop his program of weapons of mass destruction and continue to press for the release of the sanctions and continue to ignore the solemn commitments that he made? Well, he will conclude that the international community has lost its will. He will then conclude that he can go right on and do more to rebuild an arsenal of devastating destruction."
President Bill Clinton - 1998
geerair
02-27-2006, 01:22 AM
Originally posted by bootlen
Nah-ah.Don't be afraid Boots, check it out. Afterall it is your buddy Bush's State Department. They won't bite you. They may wiretap you but they wont bite you. They even have a website and everything for your convenience.
Still not primary objective.Yeah, Bush moved on to other fields of incompetence and failure.
Same as it always has been.Ask the troops over there about that.
Puppets, Bawhahahahahah. Thus speaks the Bush sockpuppet, Bootie model.
Yeah. Lotta Muslims floating around.Sadly, even more of their brethren, the Christians as well
Name just one person hwo has had his right seroded Too easy. I'll name a whole group. The Quakers.
Haven't really noticed.We know.
Me? Sockpuppet Bootie model speaks again.
geerair
02-27-2006, 01:39 AM
Originally posted by madeinusa
You are surely some sort of special ignorant. The President merely said the same things, based on the same intelligence that had been said by YOUR party since 1998.Nope. Bush cherry-picked, fabricated, used discredited defector stories to gin up a mushroom cloud threat.
The threat was so bad in 1998 that we bombed Iraq for three days after they threw out the UN inspectors.Didn't you just say Clinton didn't fight?
If EVERYONE knew that Saddam had not weapons, why did the UN want inspectors in Iraq?To verify.
If EVERYONE knew that Saddam had not weapons, why did the Congress authorize the President to use all necessary force in Iraq?Bush controlled the intel given to Congress.
If EVERYONE knew that Saddam had not weapons, why did the UN pass 17 resolutions calling for Saddam to disarm? Why was UN Resolution 1441 passed threatening the use of force to disarm him?To verify.
If you believe what you say, it is obvious that you will not be voting for "Hanoi" Kerry or "Lost Rose Law Firm Documents" Clinton in the 2008 election. But, personally, I think you are a liar.From the looks of things, you have no idea what you are talking about. then again, what's new?
"If we fail to respond today, Saddam and all those who would follow in his footsteps will be emboldened tomorrow." "Some day, some way, I guarantee you, he'll use the arsenal." What if Saddam Hussein "fails to comply, and we fail to act, or we take some ambiguous third route which gives him yet more opportunities to develop his program of weapons of mass destruction and continue to press for the release of the sanctions and continue to ignore the solemn commitments that he made? Well, he will conclude that the international community has lost its will. He will then conclude that he can go right on and do more to rebuild an arsenal of devastating destruction."
President Bill Clinton - 1998Check the date.
MadeinUSA
02-27-2006, 02:00 AM
Greer, try to use your two brain cells for once.
http://www.juntosociety.com/guest/pappas/crp_rs_033103.html
geerair
02-27-2006, 02:11 AM
Originally posted by madeinusa
Greer, try to use your two brain cells for once.
http://www.juntosociety.com/guest/pappas/crp_rs_033103.html Even two brain cells can tell your link is the same old blame Clinton myths. At least we see the well from which you draw your ignorance.
MadeinUSA
02-27-2006, 04:03 AM
Originally posted by geerair
Originally posted by madeinusa
Greer, try to use your two brain cells for once.
http://www.juntosociety.com/guest/pappas/crp_rs_033103.html Even two brain cells can tell your link is the same old blame Clinton myths. At least we see the well from which you draw your ignorance.
Speaking of ignorant, only a foolish ignorant person like yourself would attempt to blame Bush for the failures the previous administration made at protecting this country and thus carried over into the present administration for it to clean up.
Clinton and Carter. Two presidents who put this country in dangerous situations defense wise from their total lack of common sense and inability to be effective leaders.
Oh, and I still say Clintonian was a pussy who did not fight. Lobbing a few missiles that didn’t solve a problem is not fighting.
Sure is funny how several in your party felt the same way from ’98 – ’02 about saddam, yet you don’t have the balls to blame them and say they are / were wrong. What’s up with that?
bootlen
02-27-2006, 06:49 AM
Originally posted by geerair
Originally posted by madeinusa
[QUOTE]The threat was so bad in 1998 that we bombed Iraq for three days after they threw out the UN inspectors.Didn't you just say Clinton didn't fight?
:D Geer thinks running up to someone, tapping them on the shoulder, then hastily retreating is fighting.
hvac r us 2
02-27-2006, 08:43 AM
Made, can you not have a debate with out all the childish name calling? How ridiculous. :rolleyes:
Anyhow, remind me again because I am having a little fuzzy thinking this morning...
What was the UN response when Bush wanted to attack?
How many countries joined forces with us when the war started?
I forget, how many WMD did we find?
Maybe I was dreaming, but I am pretty sure I watched your fearless leader admit there were no WMD?
Why not put the same effort into Afghanistan? Nobody complaining about that war.
The Iraq war is costing lives, racking up deficit numbers to the likes we have never seen and depleting our military, IMO.
Why not concentrate on a real threat like Iran or North Korea, Iran is already flaunting in our face that we won’t do anything because our military is overextended.
If you’re not concerned about this Bush administration then you are not paying attention.
geerair
02-27-2006, 11:03 AM
Originally posted by madeinusa
Speaking of ignorant, only a foolish ignorant person like yourself would attempt to blame Bush for the failures the previous administration made at protecting this country and thus carried over into the present administration for it to clean up.Yes, it was Clinton who bamboozled Bush into ignoring PDBs warning of Bin Laden's intention to attack the U.S. Obviously Clinton induced Bush into taking a record number of vacation days while the Al-qaeda warnings were ramping up. Yes, Clinton convinced Bush that chopping wood and playing golf were more important than the security of the U.S.
Gee, who knew that Clinton was Bush's Svengali?
Clinton and Carter. Two presidents who put this country in dangerous situations defense wise from their total lack of common sense and inability to be effective leaders.Hmmmm...I believe it was Reagan who was Saddam's good buddy and who cut and ran from Lebanon after a deadly terrorist attack on the Marine Barracks.
Oh, and I still say Clintonian was a pussy who did not fight. Lobbing a few missiles that didn’t solve a problem is not fighting.No doubt you were one of those conservlicans whineing "Wag the Dog" at every clinton action.
Sure is funny how several in your party felt the same way from ’98 – ’02 about saddam, yet you don’t have the balls to blame them and say they are / were wrong. What’s up with that? My party? I'm an independent.
Clinton was wrong about the WMD. How does that excuse Bush's phonying up evidence to justify his invasion of Iraq?
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0 Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.