When God Talks

[acmanko]

to you, you can murder your child and plea insanity. Go figure.

[bootlen]

Originally posted by acmanko
to you, you can murder your child and plea insanity. Go figure.

Nah, ya can't.

[coolwhip]

What makes you think that it is God they are hearing? Could be Satan, or worse..it could be fat eddy.:eek:

[acmanko]

I don't think, the woman said God told her to cut her babies arms off

[James 3528]

How drunk do you need to get to post shet like this?

[k-fridge]

Originally posted by acmanko
to you, you can murder your child and plea insanity. Go figure.
Convienient defense but I don't think it was God she was hearing.

God's never told me to murder anyone, only to harrass liberals. http://www.easysmileys.com/img/woohoo.gif

[RoBoTeq]

While God has definitely communicated with me in many different ways, talking is not one of them. I think if anyone "talked" to me and claimed to be God, I just might get a little suspicious.

[bootlen]

Originally posted by RoBoTeq
While God has definitely communicated with me in many different ways, talking is not one of them. I think if anyone "talked" to me and claimed to be God, I just might get a little suspicious.

Then I should be suspicious of acmanko?

[geerair]

Originally posted by acmanko
to you, you can murder your child and plea insanity. Go figure. God has a history of ordering hits on babies.

[acmanko]

hers a linkhttp://www.nbc5i.com/news/7362904/detail.html?rss=dfw&psp=news

[RoBoTeq]

Originally posted by acmanko
hers a linkhttp://www.nbc5i.com/news/7362904/detail.html?rss=dfw&psp=news

Oh yeah! Definitely one too many.

[bootlen]

Originally posted by geerair

Originally posted by acmanko
to you, you can murder your child and plea insanity. Go figure. God has a history of ordering hits on babies.

Nah, He doesn't.

[geerair]

Originally posted by bootlen

Nah, He doesn't. Look it up in the Good Book. It's there in the raping and pillaging section.

[bootlen]

Originally posted by geerair

Originally posted by bootlen

Nah, He doesn't. Look it up in the Good Book. It's there in the raping and pillaging section.

Ummhmm. Already been discussed and refuted with truth and proper context. You musta missed it. Too bad. That's one ya can't argue with. hehehe

[geerair]

Originally posted by bootlen
Ummhmm. Already been discussed and refuted with truth and proper context. You musta missed it. Too bad. That's one ya can't argue with. hehehe Bad apologetics does not erase baby hits.

[bootlen]

Originally posted by geerair

Originally posted by bootlen
Ummhmm. Already been discussed and refuted with truth and proper context. You musta missed it. Too bad. That's one ya can't argue with. hehehe Bad apologetics does not erase baby hits.

Never said they did. They just don't exist.

[geerair]

Originally posted by bootlen
Never said they did. They just don't exist. Perhaps you forgot about the dashing of infants into rocks? Well, it is an extensive book. Nobody can be expected to recall all of it.

[bootlen]

Originally posted by geerair

Originally posted by bootlen
Never said they did. They just don't exist. Perhaps you forgot about the dashing of infants into rocks? Well, it is an extensive book. Nobody can be expected to recall all of it.

We've been through this and still you present it inaccurately. This is typical of you, geer. Can't handle the truth but do handily with lies.

Am I calling you a liar? Yeah. I am.

[geerair]

Originally posted by bootlen
We've been through this and still you present it inaccurately. This is typical of you, geer. Can't handle the truth but do handily with lies.

Am I calling you a liar? Yeah. I am. Yes, we have been through this. Your rationalization was that the dashing of infants, not to mention other various and assorted mayhem was due to the fact that God got his panties in a wad.

[bootlen]

Originally posted by geerair

Originally posted by bootlen
We've been through this and still you present it inaccurately. This is typical of you, geer. Can't handle the truth but do handily with lies.

Am I calling you a liar? Yeah. I am. Yes, we have been through this. Your rationalization was that the dashing of infants, not to mention other various and assorted mayhem was due to the fact that God got his panties in a wad.

See, geer. This is why so many people laugh at (not with) you. None of your posts are accurate or relevant. Good example is the one about the airport in Brunswick. While humorous at its core, it is both inaccurate and irrelevant.

You are an easy target for those with intelligence and common sense.

Press on, geer. We're enjoying this.

[RoBoTeq]

Originally posted by geerair

Originally posted by bootlen
Never said they did. They just don't exist. Perhaps you forgot about the dashing of infants into rocks? Well, it is an extensive book. Nobody can be expected to recall all of it.

All of your accusations in this vein have already been shown that these passages are being misrepresented. How many times do we have to go over the same accusations? Are you libby hatemongers really this stupid and forgetful or is your intent only to continue to cause dissent and chaos?

[geerair]

Originally posted by bootlen
See, geer. This is why so many people laugh at (not with) you.My pleasure. I exsist to spread mirth in this sad world.




None of your posts are accurate or relevant. Good example is the one about the airport in Brunswick. While humorous at its core, it is both inaccurate and irrelevant.High praise indeed considering the source. I'm flattered.



You are an easy target for those with intelligence and common sense.Probably, do you know anybody like that?


Press on, geer. We're enjoying this. Me too. Immensely

[geerair]

Originally posted by RoBoTeq
All of your accusations in this vein have already been shown that these passages are being misrepresented. How many times do we have to go over the same accusations? Are you libby hatemongers really this stupid and forgetful or is your intent only to continue to cause dissent and chaos? You gotta love the audacity and compassion of those who attempt to rationalize the dashing of infants onto rocks and other foul deeds. Not a particuarly wholesome attribute for a god.

[comfort dog]

You are an easy target for those with intelligence and common sense.Probably, do you know anybody like that?


Now THAT is funny...:D

[bootlen]

Originally posted by geerair
Originally posted by bootlen





You are an easy target for those with intelligence and common sense.[/quote]Probably, do you know anybody like that?

No one named geer.

[geerair]

Originally posted by bootlen


No one named geer.Weak

[Carnak]

Well there was killing of firstborn sons, egyptians mind you and telling a father to sacrifice his only son

[bootlen]

Originally posted by geerair

Originally posted by bootlen


No one named geer.Weak



That's all I need for you.

[bootlen]

Originally posted by Carnak
Well there was killing of firstborn sons, egyptians mind you and telling a father to sacrifice his only son

Yup. Pharaoh made the call.

C'mon Carny. You usually have yer facts straight.

[RoBoTeq]

Originally posted by Carnak
Well there was killing of firstborn sons, egyptians mind you and telling a father to sacrifice his only son

Old (Hebrew) Testament stuff, not teachings of Jesus Christ. I can't speak for God, but if these types of things are not misconceptions of the ancient Hebrews then God has certainly changed His attitude since having become incarnate as man.

[Carnak]

The facts are straight boot, was a test of faith to actually go through and sacrifice a son you miracuously had late in life. Now the test of faith was passed so the sacrifice was stopped.

[bootlen]

Originally posted by Carnak
The facts are straight boot, was a test of faith to actually go through and sacrifice a son you miracuously had late in life. Now the test of faith was passed so the sacrifice was stopped.

Straight, but incomplete. God promised Abe that Isaac would have children. Abe also said that he and Isaac would return from their journey to Moriah. Pretty much indicates his faith in God to deliver Isaac, wouldn't ya say?

[Carnak]

That's quite a stretch boot. The guy was up there ready for a burnt offering, was the ultimate leap of faith doing it because he was told to do it.

It's not like he was playing along, stalling and had faith that he would be stopped from carrying out the deed.

[bootlen]

Originally posted by Carnak
That's quite a stretch boot. The guy was up there ready for a burnt offering, was the ultimate leap of faith doing it because he was told to do it.

It's not like he was playing along, stalling and had faith that he would be stopped from carrying out the deed.

Could be you and I been reading different books.

Or could be there are other issues involved.

[Carnak]

got a verse in 22 about predicting the return trip?

[bootlen]

Originally posted by Carnak
got a verse in 22 about predicting the return trip?

V. 5.

[Carnak]

Yes he was telling the servants they would be back by the point of the whole story was 12.

[bootlen]

Originally posted by Carnak
Yes he was telling the servants they would be back by the point of the whole story was 12.



No argument from me on that. Abe was obedient even toi the point of being willing to sacrifice his only son. But he knew God would deliver Isaac. The 2 most basic things man is called to do by God...obey and trust.

Now I think I misunderstood the point of what you posted earlier.

[braces4impact]

Originally posted by RoBoTeq

Originally posted by geerair

Originally posted by bootlen
Never said they did. They just don't exist. Perhaps you forgot about the dashing of infants into rocks? Well, it is an extensive book. Nobody can be expected to recall all of it.

All of your accusations in this vein have already been shown that these passages are being misrepresented. How many times do we have to go over the same accusations? Are you libby hatemongers really this stupid and forgetful or is your intent only to continue to cause dissent and chaos?

Gee I musta missed that one. I do remember being involved in such a conversation and I do remember showing the very bad rationalizations to be full of holes.

[braces4impact]

Originally posted by RoBoTeq

Originally posted by Carnak
Well there was killing of firstborn sons, egyptians mind you and telling a father to sacrifice his only son

then God has certainly changed His attitude since having become incarnate as man.

1.) I thought god was never changing ?

2.) You are admitting to ethics being subjective.

[acmanko]

Judge declared mistrail, 11 jurors gave insane verdict, 1 juror guilty verdict. Like I said, if God says do it,than your christian peers will think you are crazy.

[bootlen]

Originally posted by braces4impact

Originally posted by RoBoTeq

Originally posted by Carnak
Well there was killing of firstborn sons, egyptians mind you and telling a father to sacrifice his only son

then God has certainly changed His attitude since having become incarnate as man.

1.) I thought god was never changing ?

2.) You are admitting to ethics being subjective.

Robo is wrong. He is never-changing. Scripture says as much...making your 2.) moot.

[bootlen]

Originally posted by acmanko
Judge declared mistrail, 11 jurors gave insane verdict, 1 juror guilty verdict. Like I said, if God says do it,than your christian peers will think you are crazy.

I doubt you'd find Christians on the jury. Secularists typically fall for the "crazy Christian" plea...not Christians. I have yet to meet a Christian who said the woman was crazy. All say she's guilty and should be punished...most say the death penalty should apply.

You DO love to show your ignorance, don'cha, ac?

[RoBoTeq]

God may be never changing in essense but it is absurd to believe that God is never changing in atitude. It is also absurd to believe that God does not err. After all; we are made in the image (spiritually speaking I believe) of God, so He must have similar attributes.

[bootlen]

Originally posted by RoBoTeq
God may be never changing in essense but it is absurd to believe that God is never changing in atitude. It is also absurd to believe that God does not err. After all; we are made in the image (spiritually speaking I believe) of God, so He must have similar attributes.

Can you quote just one Scripture where God made a mistake? (Sin is not God's mistake...it is ours.) Never changing means never changing. Yes, we are made in His image...not the other way around...and we have perverted that image via sin.

[braces4impact]

Originally posted by bootlen

Originally posted by braces4impact

Originally posted by RoBoTeq

Originally posted by Carnak
Well there was killing of firstborn sons, egyptians mind you and telling a father to sacrifice his only son

then God has certainly changed His attitude since having become incarnate as man.

1.) I thought god was never changing ?

2.) You are admitting to ethics being subjective.

Robo is wrong. He is never-changing. Scripture says as much...making your 2.) moot.

So is smashing childrens heads against rocks wrong or ok?

[acmanko]

Originally posted by braces4impact

Originally posted by bootlen

Originally posted by braces4impact

Originally posted by RoBoTeq

Originally posted by Carnak
Well there was killing of firstborn sons, egyptians mind you and telling a father to sacrifice his only son

then God has certainly changed His attitude since having become incarnate as man.

1.) I thought god was never changing ?

2.) You are admitting to ethics being subjective.

Robo is wrong. He is never-changing. Scripture says as much...making your 2.) moot.

So is smashing childrens heads against rocks wrong or ok?
that depend on the variables consistent with the attitudes of the time it would happen.

[bootlen]

Originally posted by braces4impact


So is smashing childrens heads against rocks wrong or ok?

Gee, refer. Ya have to ask to know that? Once more, I am not surprised.

[geerair]

Originally posted by braces4impact

So is smashing childrens heads against rocks wrong or ok? You wont get an answer from these boys.They are scared of their deity. Their god is a vain god and his delicate psyche cannot tolerate criticism. Last poor fella that tried that got turned into a newt.

[braces4impact]

I already know the answer to the question. The reason you wont answer it is because of the moral dilemma it sets for your fairy tale beLIEfs.

[bootlen]

Question previously asked and answered with justification.

Geer ignores facts. Refer simply never had them.

[braces4impact]

Originally posted by bootlen
Question previously asked and answered with justification.

Geer ignores facts. Refer simply never had them.

You know you keep asserting this but never post a link to the supposed "justification" nor even attempt to justify it "again".

[geerair]

Originally posted by braces4impact

Originally posted by bootlen
Question previously asked and answered with justification.

Geer ignores facts. Refer simply never had them.

You know you keep asserting this but never post a link to the supposed "justification" nor even attempt to justify it "again". Booties' version and definitions of justification and facts are to say the least fanciful.

[bootlen]

Originally posted by braces4impact

Originally posted by bootlen
Question previously asked and answered with justification.

Geer ignores facts. Refer simply never had them.

You know you keep asserting this but never post a link to the supposed "justification" nor even attempt to justify it "again".

Why should I? So you and geer can ignore or deny the truth again?

I'm satisfied just letting everybody know you're wrong.

[braces4impact]

Originally posted by bootlen

Originally posted by braces4impact

Originally posted by bootlen
Question previously asked and answered with justification.

Geer ignores facts. Refer simply never had them.

You know you keep asserting this but never post a link to the supposed "justification" nor even attempt to justify it "again".

Why should I? So you and geer can ignore or deny the truth again?

I'm satisfied just letting everybody know you're wrong.

*yawn*

[geerair]

Originally posted by braces4impact

Originally posted by bootlen

Originally posted by braces4impact

Originally posted by bootlen
Question previously asked and answered with justification.

Geer ignores facts. Refer simply never had them.

You know you keep asserting this but never post a link to the supposed "justification" nor even attempt to justify it "again".

Why should I? So you and geer can ignore or deny the truth again?

I'm satisfied just letting everybody know you're wrong.

*yawn* I recall it now. I can readily see why Boots prefers to bury it.

For years a tribe dwelled in peace on their ancestral lands, bothering no one, just living, minding their own business.
God comes along and gets his panties in a wad because these harmless folks aren't impressed with god and refuse to sing hosannas to him.

God, loving soul that he is decides their lives are worthless and wishes to end their misery.

The minions of god are summoned whereupon god issues marching orders.

"Avenge me" cries god. "Poleax the men, decapitate the women, rape the animals, salt the fields, piss in the wells and so that no man forget, dash the infants onto rocks."

Basically Booties' apologetic was that God's feelings were hurt so he ordered an entire tribe massacred to assuage his fragile ego.

[bootlen]

Originally posted by geerair


*yawn*
For years a tribe dwelled in peace on their ancestral lands, bothering no one, just living, minding their own business.
God comes along and gets his panties in a wad because these harmless folks aren't impressed with god and refuse to sing hosannas to him.

God, loving soul that he is decides their lives are worthless and wishes to end their misery.

The minions of god are summoned whereupon god issues marching orders.

"Avenge me" cries god. "Poleax the men, decapitate the women, rape the animals, salt the fields, piss in the wells and so that no man forget, dash the infants onto rocks."

[/B][/QUOTE]

Well, you rewrite history every time you post here. Now yer rewriting Holy Scripture. Your ignorance is unmatched...even by refer, try as he might to catch up.

[geerair]

Originally posted by bootlen

Originally posted by geerair


*yawn*
For years a tribe dwelled in peace on their ancestral lands, bothering no one, just living, minding their own business.
God comes along and gets his panties in a wad because these harmless folks aren't impressed with god and refuse to sing hosannas to him.

God, loving soul that he is decides their lives are worthless and wishes to end their misery.

The minions of god are summoned whereupon god issues marching orders.

"Avenge me" cries god. "Poleax the men, decapitate the women, rape the animals, salt the fields, piss in the wells and so that no man forget, dash the infants onto rocks."



Well, you rewrite history every time you post here. Now yer rewriting Holy Scripture. Your ignorance is unmatched...even by refer, try as he might to catch up. [/B][/QUOTE]Not scripture, your apologetic. God was pissed, god orders baby hits. You condone it.

[bootlen]

Originally posted by geerair
Not scripture, your apologetic. God was pissed, god orders baby hits. You condone it.

Wrong on all 5 points.

[geerair]

Originally posted by bootlen

Originally posted by geerair
Not scripture, your apologetic. God was pissed, god orders baby hits. You condone it.

Wrong on all 5 points.

Not according to your apologetic. You do realize that the thread in which you defend the killing of babies is still on the board?

[bootlen]

Originally posted by geerair

Originally posted by bootlen

Originally posted by geerair
Not scripture, your apologetic. God was pissed, god orders baby hits. You condone it.

Wrong on all 5 points.

Not according to your apologetic. You do realize that the thread in which you defend the killing of babies is still on the board?

I do not now, nor have I ever, defended the killing of babies for the sake of worship. God's orders as well.

You and johnnie really need to take a remedial reading class.

[geerair]

Originally posted by bootlen
I do not now, nor have I ever, defended the killing of babies for the sake of worship. God's orders as well. So, on what grounds do you defend killing babies?

[bootlen]

Originally posted by geerair

Originally posted by bootlen
I do not now, nor have I ever, defended the killing of babies for the sake of worship. God's orders as well. So, on what grounds do you defend killing babies?


On the gounds that God would order. Bur He would not so it's a moot point, no?

You really are a terrible reader, aren't you? I post it, you ask what I post. Get someone to read the second sentence of my last previous post on this thread.

[geerair]

Originally posted by bootlen

On the gounds that God would order. Bur He would not so it's a moot point, no? So if god ordered it, you would do it and defend it.

So the thing about dashing babies into rocks is not in the bible and god did not say this?

[bootlen]

Originally posted by geerair

Originally posted by bootlen

On the gounds that God would order. Bur He would not so it's a moot point, no? So if god ordered it, you would do it and defend it.

So the thing about dashing babies into rocks is not in the bible and god did not say this?



You tell me, geer. You claim to be the expert. Tell what it says about it and what it means. Go ahead. Be the Bible study leader.



This ought to be good.

[geerair]

Originally posted by bootlen

Originally posted by geerair

Originally posted by bootlen

On the gounds that God would order. Bur He would not so it's a moot point, no? So if god ordered it, you would do it and defend it.

So the thing about dashing babies into rocks is not in the bible and god did not say this?



You tell me, geer. You claim to be the expert. Tell what it says about it and what it means. Go ahead. Be the Bible study leader.



This ought to be good. So, you do defend God if he orders baby killings? Seems to be a bit hypocritical given your abortion views.

[bootlen]

See? Told ya this would be good. He can't even start.

[geerair]

Originally posted by bootlen
See? Told ya this would be good. He can't even start. So, god ordered baby killings ok, abortion not?
Make up your mind boots. You are either for baby killings or not. Which is it?

[bootlen]

This is really a blast.

Squir-r-r-m, geer. HAHAHAHAHA!

[bootlen]

Study leader has nothing to say? Think I'll go to another study. I'll check back later.

Please. Continue to squirm.

[geerair]

Originally posted by bootlen
Study leader has nothing to say? Think I'll go to another study. I'll check back later.

Please. Continue to squirm.
So, you condone god inspired baby killing but not abortion? Boots, I'm afraid you can't have it both ways.

[braces4impact]

If my memory serves me correctly without going look up the post I do remember boots condoning the slaughter of the babies. The reason I remember that is because I remember calling him sick.

[geerair]

Yeah, Boot condones anything from rape to baby killing as long as Big Daddy orders it. Amazing that these true believers espouse moral relativism.