Jimmy Carter...Worthless Governor / Worthless President

[James 3528]

Worthless Governor / Worthless President

His legacy was unleashing global terrorism and supporting every third world dictator.


http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/02/06/D8FJUP882.html

[bootlen]

Hah! Carter...the guy who sent men to their death in the desert on a very poorly planned and miserably failed rescue mission.

What in God's name does he know about national security?

He should stick to picking peanuts and peeing in public.

[coolwhip]

Cmon now..you have to give him some credit. He does believe in flying saucers ya know.;)

I still have a 6 pack of unopened BILLY BEER.:D

[royc]

Let me ask you this..

If you had to do a high dollar job on a handshake, who would you trust to keep his word.

Carter
Bush

I would trust Mr. Carter with anything I owned, sorry to say I cant say the same about Bush, I have a feeling, and I could be wrong, he's a backstabber.


Roy

[chillbilly]

If you had to go into battle, which would you want to have your back?
Bush
Carter

Undoubtedly, Bush.

[James 3528]

Originally posted by royc
Let me ask you this..

If you had to do a high dollar job on a handshake, who would you trust to keep his word.

Carter
Bush

I would trust Mr. Carter with anything I owned, sorry to say I cant say the same about Bush, I have a feeling, and I could be wrong, he's a backstabber.


Roy

I don't recall putting that question out there but since Carter is responsible for the rise of Islamo fascist I would say hands down, Bush.

America can look at the surveillance hearings in Washington and see Senator Patrick Leahy and the rest of the nut job democrats have partisan politics on their minds and not protecting America

[bootlen]

I think both men mean well but Carter is a country bumpkin who didn't allow a degree in nuclear physics get in the way of his ability to act without thinking.

Not a lot of diff between him and Billy. Billy's aware of his own daftness. Jimma's not.

[geerair]

Originally posted by royc
Let me ask you this..

If you had to do a high dollar job on a handshake, who would you trust to keep his word.

Carter
Bush

I would trust Mr. Carter with anything I owned, sorry to say I cant say the same about Bush, I have a feeling, and I could be wrong, he's a backstabber.


Roy
Carter, all the way. Bush could break an anvil besides making Nixon look like a choirboy in comparison.

Abu Al is laying out the dark, twisted picture that is the Bush administration. By the time 2008 rolls around those administration officials not already in jail will be preparing their perp walks.

Truly the most incompetent, dishonest, crooked, damaging to the U.S. administration by a huge margin.

[tonys]

Originally posted by bootlen
Hah! Carter...the guy who sent men to their death in the desert on a very poorly planned and miserably failed rescue mission.

What in God's name does he know about national security?

He should stick to picking peanuts and peeing in public.

Are you referring to the president circa 2003 or 1979?

[tonys]

...I forgot "mission accomplished".

[James 3528]

Safe for 5 years.


Held hostages in Iran 444 days and released the day Reagan swears in.

Democrats do not protect America. Look at Ted Kennedy. People are not even safe in his car.

[tonys]

True.

Ted likes his Jack (not in a gay-way).

Do you know of a politician who doesn't hit-it-hard every day at the local pub?

(born-again-Christians don't count - they're just weird.)

[bootlen]

Originally posted by tonys

Originally posted by bootlen
Hah! Carter...the guy who sent men to their death in the desert on a very poorly planned and miserably failed rescue mission.

What in God's name does he know about national security?

He should stick to picking peanuts and peeing in public.

Are you referring to the president circa 2003 or 1979?

Gee, tony. You think Carter was President in 2003?

Figures.

[bootlen]

Originally posted by tonys
...I forgot "mission accomplished".


And you obviously don't know the diff between a mission and a war.

Figures.

[James 3528]

LOL

[tonys]

Originally posted by bootlen

Originally posted by tonys
...I forgot "mission accomplished".


And you obviously don't know the diff between a mission and a war.

Figures.

Why don't you tell me, Bible-Man?

I know one thing...you better have a 'well defined mission' before you wage a war...or annex a country or two.

[tonys]

"LOL"

there's an over-used web-script by the really, really gifted amongst us.

[James 3528]

Originally posted by tonys

Originally posted by bootlen

Originally posted by tonys
...I forgot "mission accomplished".


And you obviously don't know the diff between a mission and a war.

Figures.

Why don't you tell me, Bible-Man?

I know one thing...you better have a 'well defined mission' before you wage a war...or annex a country or two.



General Patton. Find the "well defined mission" book for any war.



I think the only page in it when you do is winning.


duh

[bootlen]

Originally posted by tonys
i]Originally posted by bootlen [/i]
Originally posted by tonys
...I forgot "mission accomplished".

And you obviously don't know the diff between a mission and a war.

Figures. [/QUOTE]

Why don't you tell me, Bible-Man?

O-o-oh. I'm so insulted...

I know one thing...you better have a 'well defined mission' before you wage a war...or annex a country or two.



No, you don't know that. Someone told you that. And while you can have a "well defined mission", you can never have a well defined war. Things change. Ever hear of "adapt and overcome"? Didn't think so.

[tonys]

Here's a few 'tips for winning a war':

1) take the BILLIONS spent on 'intelligence' prior to the war and place people (i.e. buy-them-off) on the ground who will work with you to 'calm the natives' once your tanks arrive. This may help in such trivial matters (trivial according to Rumsfield et al) such as protecting the hospital medical inventories from looters.

2) Try organizing your troops in a manner that includes securing ALL key buildings and institutions, not just the oil refineries, once your bombing campaign has ended.

3) Don't let your soldiers take photos - of ANY kind (let alone the prison variety).

4) Never tell your enemy "bring em on", cowboy.

[bootlen]

Originally posted by tonys
Here's a few 'tips for winning a war':

1) take the BILLIONS spent on 'intelligence' prior to the war and place people (i.e. buy-them-off) on the ground who will work with you to 'calm the natives' once your tanks arrive. This may help in such trivial matters (trivial according to Rumsfield et al) such as protecting the hospital medical inventories from looters.

2) Try organizing your troups in a manner that includes securing ALL key buildings and institutions, not just the oil refineries, once your bombing campaign has ended.

3) Don't let your soldiers take photos - of ANY kind (let alone the prison variety).

4) Never tell your enemy "bring em on", cowboy.

Yer really ticked about all that, aren't you?

Mission accomplished.

[James 3528]

Why? It will upset them?


piiiiff

Someone squats to pee.

[bootlen]

Originally posted by James 3528
Why? It will upset them?


piiiiff

Someone squats to pee.

Have ya noticed? They haven't taken him up on the challenge.

[tonys]

No, not at all.
Just amazed by the large clan that believes 'all went well'.


I KNOW things will work out fine in the end, because it IS America we're talking about here.
Not, the Russians trying to smack the Afghani's around for 12 years (just as an example).


But, at what cost?
What went wrong? SPECIFICALLY, not generally.
Who's to blame?

Why isn't the US running sorties over Iran at this very minute?
That's where you'll find the 'death to America' family rallies. I-Crack was F-d UP...

...sorry, according to Jimmy-Boy-Man-Love-8675309, G'Dub'Ya can do NO wrong!

[hvacpope]

Jimmy think of himself as great stateman, hes going around the world supervising elections and talking crap about Bush, I hardly hear anyone criticize the old fart, I would love to break the news to him, plain and simple tell him how much he sucked in those few years after some crazie Americans elected him to the high post.

[tonys]

Originally posted by bootlen

Originally posted by James 3528
Why? It will upset them?


piiiiff

Someone squats to pee.

Have ya noticed? They haven't taken him up on the challenge.

you're kidding, right?

...tell that to the 19-year old GI going out-for-a-drive around Bagdad today.

[bootlen]

Originally posted by tonys
No, not at all.
Just amazed by the large clan that believes 'all went well'.


I KNOW things will work out fine in the end, because it IS America we're talking about here.
Not, the Russians trying to smack the Afghani's around for 12 years (just as an example).


But, at what cost?
What went wrong? SPECIFICALLY, not generally.
Who's to blame?

Why isn't the US running sorties over Iran at this very minute?
That's where you'll find the 'death to America' family rallies. I-Crack was F-d UP...

...sorry, according to Jimmy-Boy-Man-Love-8675309, G'Dub'Ya can do NO wrong!


At what cost? Lemme see. I guess we could go with one of your "well defined missions", cut the cost of weapons, and sent in warm bodies. Oops. That means we'd need a draft, lots more caskets, and deeper graves. But think of the bucks we'd save!

Yeah, tony. We're really payin' attention to you for the next war. Or would that be next mission? I'm so confused!

[tonys]

You know what confuses me...

if the helmoltz model is a better estimate of resonance, why should I assume an arbitrary location for this point of resonance when I haven't even included wall losses?

afterall, the compliance is A*L / ro * c^2
(i.e. complete section of the element)

[bootlen]

WOW! You ARE confused.

[bootlen]

Originally posted by tonys

Originally posted by bootlen

Originally posted by James 3528
Why? It will upset them?


piiiiff

Someone squats to pee.

Have ya noticed? They haven't taken him up on the challenge.

you're kidding, right?

...tell that to the 19-year old GI going out-for-a-drive around Bagdad today.

Heh. Almost overlooked this one.

I do believe W was in CONUS when he made the remark in question. You do know what the word "bring" means, don't you?

Figures.

[chillbilly]

Running sorties over Iran? There is a process that is supposed to be followed to have these rogue leaders comply with International Law. Iran is no exception.
That process was followed and adhered to with respect to Iraq as it will be with Iran.
All 'diplomatic' solutions were exhausted unless, of course, the world wanted to go back to the negotiating table. As I remember it, the Democrats in Congress agreed and voted that force was required.
Yet, since they can't manage the war, they will use it as a means to a political end.

All this "bring the boys home" crap is politically motivated rhetoric.
That 19 year old you refer to is doing his f--king job which is more than I can say for the traitors that don't support his effort.
Oh, and by the way, my German Shepherd could strategize and rationalize this war effort better than Carter and any other Democrat you can conjure up.

[MadeinUSA]

Originally posted by tonys
Not, the Russians trying to smack the Afghani's around for 12 years (just as an example).We didn't get slapped around in Afghan for 12 years did we?

Nope. I didn't think so.

What's your point? Are you about to tell us Afghan is the same as Iraq. That is like saying N. korea is the same as Japan. Just because they look alike doesn't mean they are alike.

[tonys]

straight-out-ta Fox-News, billy-BOY.

The comments on I-Crack (you seemed to have missed it), was with regards to the lack of planning and preparation on the ground prior to the attack.
...not international law and UN protocol

If that's the case, the 'allies' should have reported Iran to the security council long ago. Instead of dragging their heels to bend over to the oil thirsty Chinese and Indians who rely on terrorist-sponsored oil (via Iranian oilfields).

...but, it's NOT about the oil.

[tonys]

Originally posted by madeinusa

Originally posted by tonys
Not, the Russians trying to smack the Afghani's around for 12 years (just as an example).We didn't get slapped around in Afghan for 12 years did we?

Nope. I didn't think so.

What's your point? Are you about to tell us Afghan is the same as Iraq. That is like saying N. korea is the same as Japan. Just because they look alike doesn't mean they are alike.

Are you reading individual lines?
Did you read the entire post and the previous 3-4?

The analogy of the Russians is that the US will 'get it right' in I-crack, unlike the communist nation-building cousins.
...a little obtuse for ya?

[bootlen]

Originally posted by tonys
straight-out-ta Fox-News, billy-BOY.

The comments on I-Crack (you seemed to have missed it), was with regards to the lack of planning and preparation on the ground prior to the attack.
...not international law and UN protocol

If that's the case, the 'allies' should have reported Iran to the security council long ago. Instead of dragging their heels to bend over to the oil thirsty Chinese and Indians who rely on terrorist-sponsored oil (via Iranian oilfields).

...but, it's NOT about the oil.

Lack of planning? The greatest military victory in human history was accomplished without planning? Cripes. What could W have done if he had planned it?

Looks like it's not about oil to me if we haven't invaded Iran. Hmmm. I guess you're right...it's NOT about oil.

[tonys]

Originally posted by bootlen

Originally posted by tonys
straight-out-ta Fox-News, billy-BOY.

The comments on I-Crack (you seemed to have missed it), was with regards to the lack of planning and preparation on the ground prior to the attack.
...not international law and UN protocol

If that's the case, the 'allies' should have reported Iran to the security council long ago. Instead of dragging their heels to bend over to the oil thirsty Chinese and Indians who rely on terrorist-sponsored oil (via Iranian oilfields).

...but, it's NOT about the oil.

Lack of planning? The greatest military victory in human history was accomplished without planning? Cripes. What could W have done if he had planned it?

Looks like it's not about oil to me if we haven't invaded Iran. Hmmm. I guess you're right...it's NOT about oil.

why do you 'expose' yourself on a regular basis?

1) victory? does that include security, reconstruction of the facilities you destroyed during your invasion, and the broken down facilities that existed for decades - of course proper planning would have forseen the real conditions within I-crack and what the US would inherit when they annexed it.

(note: greatest military vicotory in history? the US attacked a country WITHOUT AN AIRFORCE!!! Compare that with victories by Alexander in India, Romans in North Africa, and the allies on the beaches in France)

2) The US hasn't invaded Iran (yet) because of China, the 65$/barrel price of oil, the $500 B yearly deficits, and the extended tours by soldiers involved in I-crack.
Once these matters clear-up, including buying off China in some manner...let's say 'giving them Hong Kong', the rumble with the camel humpers will begin.

[MadeinUSA]

Originally posted by tonys
Why isn't the US running sorties over Iran at this very minute?Oh boy, this has got to be THE joke of the month.

First you say we acted prematurely in Iraq by not letting the UN inspectors do their jobs, and now you say we should attack before we have even gone through the worthless UN.

You guys should just go be stand INS for B films, because you definitely do not have the ability to remember any lines.

Edit: To keep the spirit of the thread on track, Carter was the worst president ever, and I sure am glad I did not have to watch that GAY smile for another 4 years.


[Edited by madeinusa on 02-07-2006 at 01:19 PM]

[tonys]

Originally posted by madeinusa

Originally posted by tonys
Why isn't the US running sorties over Iran at this very minute?Oh boy, this has got to be THE joke of the month.

First you say we acted prematurely in Iraq by not letting the UN inspectors do their jobs, and now you say we should attack before we have even gone through the worthless UN.

You guys should just go be stand INS B films, because you definitely do not have the ability to remember any lines.


are you functionally illiterate?

or part-time?

highlight the comment about UN inspectors and the 'process'.

the comments were addressing planning on the ground prior to the invasion (spies, intelligence, securing all critical facilities, etc. etc. etc.)...should I include the lack of allies participating in the US venture into another foreign land?

[bootlen]

Originally posted by tonys

Originally posted by bootlen

Originally posted by tonys
straight-out-ta Fox-News, billy-BOY.

The comments on I-Crack (you seemed to have missed it), was with regards to the lack of planning and preparation on the ground prior to the attack.
...not international law and UN protocol

If that's the case, the 'allies' should have reported Iran to the security council long ago. Instead of dragging their heels to bend over to the oil thirsty Chinese and Indians who rely on terrorist-sponsored oil (via Iranian oilfields).

...but, it's NOT about the oil.

Lack of planning? The greatest military victory in human history was accomplished without planning? Cripes. What could W have done if he had planned it?

Looks like it's not about oil to me if we haven't invaded Iran. Hmmm. I guess you're right...it's NOT about oil.

why do you 'expose' yourself on a regular basis?

1) victory? does that include security, reconstruction of the facilities you destroyed during your invasion, and the broken down facilities that existed for decades - of course proper planning would have forseen the real conditions within I-crack and what the US would inherit when they annexed it.

(note: greatest military vicotory in history? the US attacked a country WITHOUT AN AIRFORCE!!! Compare that with victories by Alexander in India, Romans in North Africa, and the allies on the beaches in France)

2) The US hasn't invaded Iran (yet) because of China, the 65$/barrel price of oil, the $500 B yearly deficits, and the extended tours by soldiers involved in I-crack.
Once these matters clear-up, including buying off China in some manner...let's say 'giving them Hong Kong', the rumble with the camel humpers will begin.

You mean it matters whether we win with or without an Air Force? Hmmm. Don't remember that in any rules of war or the Geneva Convention. You maybe have a link?

Remember I asked you about "adapt and overcome"? Do a study on that and get back to me.

[tonys]

quite the homo-like-smirk on that man, I must say.

[MadeinUSA]

Originally posted by tonys
should I include the lack of allies participating in the US venture into another foreign land?Wake up clown, there were several of our allies helping.

Unlike you, we are adults and do not ask others for permission to protect the USA. You should stay on the back patio with the other children.

[tonys]

you declared it the "greatest military victory in human history"

maybe the greatest "one sided attack in human history",
but that's not saying much when the US spends nearly $1 trillion a year on the military.



..."study", now that's comedy.

[bootlen]

Originally posted by madeinusa

Originally posted by tonys
should I include the lack of allies participating in the US venture into another foreign land?Wake up clown, there were several of our allies helping.

Unlike you, we are adults and do not ask others for permission to protect the USA. You should stay on the back patio with the other children.

Hell, made, he won't even stay in his sandbox. Keeps crappin' in it. He's a wanna-be pussy, I guess.

[tonys]

Originally posted by madeinusa

Originally posted by tonys
should I include the lack of allies participating in the US venture into another foreign land?Wake up clown, there were several of our allies helping.

Unlike you, we are adults and do not ask others for permission to protect the USA. You should stay on the back patio with the other children.

WTF does that have to do with the problems faced by the US military and costs by the US tax-payer after the "greatest military attack in history"?
ref. lack of PLANNING!!!!!!!!!!!


and, it seems you want to change the focus of the previous 15 posts, so I'm game:

Allies?
Such as...England.

o.k.
1) who created those artificial borders within the middle east (sort-of-a pet project gone wrong)?
2) where do the 5 biggest oil companies in the world come from???

[tonys]

Originally posted by bootlen

Originally posted by madeinusa

Originally posted by tonys
should I include the lack of allies participating in the US venture into another foreign land?Wake up clown, there were several of our allies helping.

Unlike you, we are adults and do not ask others for permission to protect the USA. You should stay on the back patio with the other children.

Hell, made, he won't even stay in his sandbox. Keeps crappin' in it. He's a wanna-be pussy, I guess.

I guess when you only really read 1 BOOK, you start to repeat yourself over and over again.

talk about being stuck in the shallow-end!

[MadeinUSA]

Originally posted by tonys
and, it seems you want to change the focus of the previous 15 posts, so I'm game:Actually, I think we are staying on topic fairly well being you are living up to Jimmy's reputation of having no forward visioning or reasoning abilities.

[tonys]

alrighty, then.

[MadeinUSA]

Hey Tony, here’s one for you. Being you are SO correct, cough, why don’t you go start a new thread and tell us how we should handle Iran, and being how you guys are sooo confident you will own the big house here in 3 years, which is about the time we will be acting on them, go tell us how you guys will solve this impending situation.

It should make for some good laughter in 5 years. We will save the thread.

Carter still has the last place spot all won for quite a few years to come, maybe forever.

[bootlen]

Originally posted by tonys
you declared it the "greatest military victory in human history"

maybe the greatest "one sided attack in human history",
but that's not saying much when the US spends nearly $1 trillion a year on the military.



..."study", now that's comedy.


Actually, no, I didn't. History has.

A trillion a year on the military. You really wanna compare a trillion to lives saved by technoilogical warfare? Is that your game plan? (It's apparently a game to you.)

Figures.

Yer not studying. Yer posting. Next report card will reflect, "Doesn't listen well in class."

[tonys]

...actually, I'm a conservative who happens to find humor in "America - the Fox-News version".

[tonys]

Originally posted by bootlen

Originally posted by tonys
you declared it the "greatest military victory in human history"

maybe the greatest "one sided attack in human history",
but that's not saying much when the US spends nearly $1 trillion a year on the military.



..."study", now that's comedy.


Actually, no, I didn't. History has.

A trillion a year on the military. You really wanna compare a trillion to lives saved by technoilogical warfare? Is that your game plan? (It's apparently a game to you.)

Figures.

Yer not studying. Yer posting. Next report card will reflect, "Doesn't listen well in class."

I need to clarify something with you:

In 2003, did the US annex a third-world country?
Yes or No?

[bootlen]

Originally posted by tonys
...actually, I'm a conservative who happens to find humor in "America - the Fox-News version".

Now yer a wanna-be conservative. No wonder yer confused, Fluffy. "I wanna be a pussy." "I wanna be a conservative."

Those 2 are diametrically opposed. Ya gotta dump all that liberal think crap, forget about being a sand crapper and pull yer head out. Then you are ready to begin on the road to becoming a conservative.

[MadeinUSA]

Originally posted by tonys
In 2003, did the US annex a third-world country?
Yes or No?
You do know they just voted don't you?

[bootlen]

Originally posted by tonys


I need to clarify something with you:

In 2003, did the US annex a third-world country?
Yes or No?


No.

[tonys]

Originally posted by madeinusa

Originally posted by tonys
In 2003, did the US annex a third-world country?
Yes or No?
You do know they just voted don't you?

do you play with lego blocks?

[bootlen]

Originally posted by madeinusa

Originally posted by tonys
In 2003, did the US annex a third-world country?
Yes or No?
You do know they just voted don't you?

No, he's not aware of that. He and his buddies are still stuck on the 2000 and 2004 Presidential elections.

[MadeinUSA]

You seem to be confused with the two words Mission and Annex.

[tonys]

Originally posted by bootlen

Originally posted by tonys


I need to clarify something with you:

In 2003, did the US annex a third-world country?
Yes or No?


No.

o.k.
here we go...

the Gross National Income for I-Crack in 2004 was $3,500 (USD)

that put's it slightly behind Guatemala (@ 4,100 $/year) and ahead of the economic power house of Chad - that's in Africa, bible-boy (@ 1,700 $/year)

[MadeinUSA]

Originally posted by bootlen

Originally posted by madeinusa

Originally posted by tonys
In 2003, did the US annex a third-world country?
Yes or No?
You do know they just voted don't you?

No, he's not aware of that. He and his buddies are still stuck on the 2000 and 2004 Presidential elections. They always will be. They will be using the Broward county story 4 generations from now. They have living in the past down to an art now.

[tonys]

Originally posted by madeinusa
You seem to be confused with the two words Mission and Annex.

I don't have a problem with Annexing I-crack.
They picked the wrong Texan to F'with.

IT WAS THE LACK OF PROCESS and the PLANNING ahead of time!!!

[MadeinUSA]

Originally posted by tonys

Originally posted by bootlen

Originally posted by tonys


I need to clarify something with you:

In 2003, did the US annex a third-world country?
Yes or No?


No.

o.k.
here we go...

the Gross National Income for I-Crack in 2004 was $3,500 (USD)

that put's it slightly behind Guatemala (@ 4,100 $/year) and ahead of the economic power house of Chad - that's in Africa, bible-boy (@ 1,700 $/year)

Booty, you confused him so much now he is dry drunk.

[bootlen]

Originally posted by tonys

Originally posted by bootlen

Originally posted by tonys


I need to clarify something with you:

In 2003, did the US annex a third-world country?
Yes or No?


No.

o.k.
here we go...

the Gross National Income for I-Crack in 2004 was $3,500 (USD)

that put's it slightly behind Guatemala (@ 4,100 $/year) and ahead of the economic power house of Chad - that's in Africa, bible-boy (@ 1,700 $/year)



Well, then, they're on a par with France. That is if France ever pays us their debt with interest from WWII.

I am assuming yer tryin' to make a point. Don't bore us all with a moot one. Pleeeease.

[tonys]

you good'ol'boys are good'ol'entertainment,

THAT's for sure!

classic stuff.

[MadeinUSA]

Originally posted by tonys
IT WAS THE LACK OF PROCESS and the PLANNING ahead of time!!!If I remember our planning was right being how we marched right in there.

Now when you can find me a book guaranteeing the processes after a mission has been accomplished, we will talk.

[tonys]

Originally posted by bootlen

Originally posted by tonys

Originally posted by bootlen

Originally posted by tonys


I need to clarify something with you:

In 2003, did the US annex a third-world country?
Yes or No?


No.

o.k.
here we go...

the Gross National Income for I-Crack in 2004 was $3,500 (USD)

that put's it slightly behind Guatemala (@ 4,100 $/year) and ahead of the economic power house of Chad - that's in Africa, bible-boy (@ 1,700 $/year)



Well, then, they're on a par with France. That is if France ever pays us their debt with interest from WWII.

I am assuming yer tryin' to make a point. Don't bore us all with a moot one. Pleeeease.

the POINT is that YOU ARE WRONG.

i-crack IS a poor country, that could not defend itself (let alone the will to do so).

So, exactly how was the 1-week campaign "the greatest military victory in history" (as YOU claim) and NOT the greatest 1-sided invasion in history,
and WHAT does that to do with the lack of PLANNING and costs associated with it after the fact?

tell me, oh'wise'man, tell meeeeeeee.

[James 3528]

Originally posted by tonys

Originally posted by madeinusa
You seem to be confused with the two words Mission and Annex.

I don't have a problem with Annexing I-crack.
They picked the wrong Texan to F'with.

IT WAS THE LACK OF PROCESS and the PLANNING ahead of time!!!


You have a problem with reality and English for someone that has a problem with "LOL" . I-crack? Did you ride your skateboard today?


Where did you get your war planning expertise? Michael Moore?

[bootlen]

Originally posted by tonys

Originally posted by bootlen

Originally posted by tonys

Originally posted by bootlen

Originally posted by tonys


I need to clarify something with you:

In 2003, did the US annex a third-world country?
Yes or No?


No.

o.k.
here we go...

the Gross National Income for I-Crack in 2004 was $3,500 (USD)

that put's it slightly behind Guatemala (@ 4,100 $/year) and ahead of the economic power house of Chad - that's in Africa, bible-boy (@ 1,700 $/year)



Well, then, they're on a par with France. That is if France ever pays us their debt with interest from WWII.

I am assuming yer tryin' to make a point. Don't bore us all with a moot one. Pleeeease.

the POINT is that YOU ARE WRONG.

i-crack IS a poor country, that could not defend itself (let alone the will to do so).

So, exactly how was the 1-week campaign "the greatest military victory in history" (as YOU claim) and NOT the greatest 1-sided invasion in history,
and WHAT does that to do with the lack of PLANNING and costs associated with it after the fact?

tell me, oh'wise'man, tell meeeeeeee.

Exactly my point. Thank you for making it. An invasion is one stage. Occupation is another. They have not to do with each other except one typically follows the other provided the aforementioned other was a success.

Occupation is all about "adapt and overcome", particularly in a case where there are no uniformed soldiers AND particularly when a large number of them are not native to the occupied territory.

W said early on that this will be a long, hard war. I guess you were busy soiling yer sandbox when he said it.

[tonys]

during your amazing invasion (did you wet your pants while watching it on FOX?), the US planners failed to protect basic institutions and trivial areas such as hospitals.

...too much time invested in the scripture stuff on Wed. nights, dude.

[tonys]

by the way... 'W' (pronounced by his buddies "duuub-ya"),
was referring to the war on Terror.

oh yeah, "it's the same thing", now that Alpha-Base for the islamonuts has become Bagdad.

[MadeinUSA]

Originally posted by tonys
the US planners failed to protect basic institutions and trivial areas such as hospitals.If you are going to debate, you really should lift your IQ level above middle school level.

Here’s your pick, you show us which is more crucial in protecting:

1. Casualties
2. Infrastructure

[bootlen]

Originally posted by tonys
during your amazing invasion (did you wet your pants while watching it on FOX?), the US planners failed to protect basic institutions and trivial areas such as hospitals.

...too much time invested in the scripture stuff on Wed. nights, dude.


Actually, no, I was in the Smokies in a log cabin on the French Broad River. I don't pee my pants so that comment was what is known as projection.

Planning for occupation is usually a waste of time and energy. Uncountable variables. "Adapt and overcome." Do your study.

You spend too much time in lib media. They will tell you teh place is falling apart. Fact is, while they are still disorganized in their gov., they are leaps and bounds of where the USA was in its infancy.

Pop a valium, tony.

[bootlen]

Originally posted by tonys
by the way... 'W' (pronounced by his buddies "duuub-ya"),
was referring to the war on Terror.

oh yeah, "it's the same thing", now that Alpha-Base for the islamonuts has become Bagdad.




What? When he said "Mission accomplished"?

[tonys]

Originally posted by madeinusa

Originally posted by tonys
the US planners failed to protect basic institutions and trivial areas such as hospitals.If you are going to debate, you really should lift your IQ level above middle school level.

Here’s your pick, you show us which is more crucial in protecting:

1. Casualties
2. Infrastructure




didn't you REALLY mean:

1) Oil Refineries
2) Casualties
3) Bullets
4) and way down the list, hospitals

[bootlen]

Originally posted by tonys

Originally posted by madeinusa

Originally posted by tonys
the US planners failed to protect basic institutions and trivial areas such as hospitals.If you are going to debate, you really should lift your IQ level above middle school level.

Here’s your pick, you show us which is more crucial in protecting:

1. Casualties
2. Infrastructure




didn't you REALLY mean:

1) Oil Refineries
2) Casualties
3) Bullets
4) and way down the list, hospitals

Are you old enough to remember Gulf I? How about the burning oilfields? Made our guys pretty sick.

Anything else?

[tonys]

Originally posted by madeinusa

Originally posted by tonys
the US planners failed to protect basic institutions and trivial areas such as hospitals.If you are going to debate, you really should lift your IQ level above middle school level.

Here’s your pick, you show us which is more crucial in protecting:

1. Casualties
2. Infrastructure




starting to get away from your useless anti-UN propaganda that had NOTHING to do with the question regarding "planning", are we?

took a while, but you're like the little train that would "think he can, think he can, ..."

and, how many degrees do you have hanging on the wall behind you? (community college doesn't count).

[MadeinUSA]

Originally posted by tonys

Originally posted by madeinusa

Originally posted by tonys
the US planners failed to protect basic institutions and trivial areas such as hospitals.If you are going to debate, you really should lift your IQ level above middle school level.

Here’s your pick, you show us which is more crucial in protecting:

1. Casualties
2. Infrastructure




didn't you REALLY mean:

1) Oil Refineries
2) Casualties
3) Bullets
4) and way down the list, hospitals What is the matter? Did my question point out your true lack of caring for human life, and you don’t have the balls to admit it?

[James 3528]

First sign a liberal has lost the debate.



LOL

[MadeinUSA]

Originally posted by tonys
and, how many degrees do you have hanging on the wall behind you? (community college doesn't count). It is what you learn after the degree that counts. A person like you who stops learning after you obtain your degree is what holds this world back.

[MadeinUSA]

Originally posted by James 3528
First sign a liberal has lost the debate.

LOL I keep letting him tee off from the ladies tee box, but for some reason, he keeps bogeying the holes.

[tonys]

the 'security' of the oil fields went way beyond placing a tank in front of an oil-well

it included securing the office of the oil ministry and all pipelines (which can be easily turned OFF).

would burning paper correction fluid at the oil ministry building make 'our guys sick' as well?

but, the great planners would protect an office building (for oil) and let the looters sack the hospitals and drug store inventories.

sure.

[bootlen]

Originally posted by tonys

and, how many degrees do you have hanging on the wall behind you? (community college doesn't count).

You and Jimma. Two of a kind. I figured you for a peanut picker but didn't realize you peed in public.

[tonys]

your argument is a solid as your educational background.

of course, good'ol'boys disregard it, because you COULDN'T GET IT!

[MadeinUSA]

Originally posted by tonys
and, how many degrees do you have hanging on the wall behind you? (community college doesn't count). Duz mi spellin sertifiket four a spellin kontest whilz inz pree schuul kount?

[bootlen]

Originally posted by tonys
the 'security' of the oil fields went way beyond placing a tank in front of an oil-well

it included securing the office of the oil ministry and all pipelines (which can be easily turned OFF).

would burning paper correction fluid at the oil ministry building make 'our guys sick' as well?

but, the great planners would protect an office building (for oil) and let the looters sack the hospitals and drug store inventories.

sure.

Try connecting the cerebrum to the fingers before yer next post.

What's the quickest way to get a new gov on it's feet? Provide revenue.

What is Iran's greatest potential source of revenue?
Oil.

Damn! Sounds like a plan may have been in the offing.

[bootlen]

BTW. For those of you who haven't figured it out...tony's degree is engineering. That should explain quite a bit.



























I heard all those A-a-a-o-o-o-o-oh's.

[tonys]

boot-tay...it was the OFFICE building!

if you're a marine sitting in your humvee in front of this place and you see Ahmed and Jumanji in the distance running out of a burning hospital with cases of morphine pills...what would you think about "the guys calling the shots"?

and try to be honest - the big guy expects it from you.

[tonys]

boot-tay,

that would be 2 of them...making it 2 more than YOU.

[MadeinUSA]

Originally posted by tonys
but, the great planners would protect an office building (for oil) and let the looters sack the hospitals and drug store inventories.

sure. You are Ray Nagin's brother aren't you?

[tonys]

they don't call you soon-to-be made-in-China for nothing...

[bootlen]

Originally posted by tonys
boot-tay...it was the OFFICE building!

if you're a marine sitting in your humvee in front of this place and you see Ahmed and Jumanji in the distance running out of a burning hospital with cases of morphine pills...what would you think about "the guys calling the shots"?

and try to be honest - the big guy expects it from you.

Looters. Pick 'em off. Mission accomplished.

[tonys]

Originally posted by bootlen

Originally posted by tonys
boot-tay...it was the OFFICE building!

if you're a marine sitting in your humvee in front of this place and you see Ahmed and Jumanji in the distance running out of a burning hospital with cases of morphine pills...what would you think about "the guys calling the shots"?

and try to be honest - the big guy expects it from you.

Looters. Pick 'em off. Mission accomplished.

that seems like a reasonable plan-B,
especially when you're lacking Plan-A.

[bootlen]

Originally posted by tonys
boot-tay,

that would be 2 of them...making it 2 more than YOU.


Uh. Right.

[MadeinUSA]

Originally posted by tonys
boot-tay,

that would be 2 of them...making it 2 more than YOU.
There are people in the world with doctorate degrees who are completely ignorant when it comes to reasoning abilities in the real world.

Does having two degrees bring you closer to this plateau also?

[tonys]

Originally posted by madeinusa

Originally posted by tonys
boot-tay,

that would be 2 of them...making it 2 more than YOU.
There are people in the world with doctorate degrees who are completely ignorant when it comes to reasoning abilities in the real world.

Does having two degrees bring you closer to this plateau also?

I HIGHLY doubt you know of any individuals with Ph.D's, let alone the ignorant variety.

highly unlikely...

but, stranger things have happened.

For example: G'Dub'Ya wanted his next fantasy job to be Prez of the US...got it.

...

[MadeinUSA]

Originally posted by tonys

Originally posted by bootlen

Originally posted by tonys
boot-tay...it was the OFFICE building!

if you're a marine sitting in your humvee in front of this place and you see Ahmed and Jumanji in the distance running out of a burning hospital with cases of morphine pills...what would you think about "the guys calling the shots"?

and try to be honest - the big guy expects it from you.

Looters. Pick 'em off. Mission accomplished.

that seems like a reasonable plan-B,
especially when you're lacking Plan-A. Plan A would create more casualties, but then we already went down that road with you, right?

[bootlen]

Yer on a roll, tony. Bring it on!

[James 3528]

It has occurred to me that with Tony being a general with out a army, a highly educated economist and mayor of a village with a lot of idiots, he would not know Carter was worthless to start with.

Worthless Gov, Worthless Prez ;)

[bootlen]

Originally posted by tonys
that seems like a reasonable plan-B,
especially when you're lacking Plan-A.

Never been on a military mission, have you? Secondary and tertiary objectives are always part of the overall plan.

Now see? Yer learning something for a change.

[tonys]

Alright...

how about...when will somebody take-on, I mean REALLY take-on the Administration (all of them) for making such firm, confident statements about the WMDs.

now, made-in-china, don't get all confused by these 'words'
...but, I'm referring specifically to the selling job they did.
O.K. - if they made an honest mistake.
Fine...2,200 soldiers and 200 billion later...the US is left with rebuilding a 3rd world country...fine indeed.

But, at least do the honorable thing and admit YOU MESSED UP, and QUIT YOUR JOB.

(can you tell I have a problem with Rumsfield's actions before/after the invasion...?)

[tonys]

Originally posted by bootlen

Originally posted by tonys
that seems like a reasonable plan-B,
especially when you're lacking Plan-A.

Never been on a military mission, have you? Secondary and tertiary objectives are always part of the overall plan.

Now see? Yer learning something for a change.

I'm not a poor-kid living in the projects, so no I have not and never will be 'on a military mission', unless you count paint-ball...now THAT was fun...

[bootlen]

Well, one of Saddam's right hand men said those weapons are in Syria.

[bootlen]

Originally posted by tonys

Originally posted by bootlen

Originally posted by tonys
that seems like a reasonable plan-B,
especially when you're lacking Plan-A.

Never been on a military mission, have you? Secondary and tertiary objectives are always part of the overall plan.

Now see? Yer learning something for a change.

I'm not a poor-kid living in the projects, so no I have not and never will be 'on a military mission', unless you count paint-ball...now THAT was fun...

Okie-dokie. What was the objective of the game?

[tonys]

Originally posted by bootlen
Well, one of Saddam's right hand men said those weapons are in Syria.

the same guys telling the world they had them?

if 'true', go get them?

Oh, I forgot, the money spent on 'intelligence' doesn't afford spies within Syria...yet another rat-infested poor-house.

[tonys]

Originally posted by bootlen

Originally posted by tonys

Originally posted by bootlen

Originally posted by tonys
that seems like a reasonable plan-B,
especially when you're lacking Plan-A.

Never been on a military mission, have you? Secondary and tertiary objectives are always part of the overall plan.

Now see? Yer learning something for a change.

I'm not a poor-kid living in the projects, so no I have not and never will be 'on a military mission', unless you count paint-ball...now THAT was fun...

Okie-dokie. What was the objective of the game?

Basically, you run around the forest pretenting you're Rambo and you shoot your opponent with a high-velocity ball of paint...it's real...and it's good.

[bootlen]

Originally posted by bootlen

Originally posted by tonys

Originally posted by bootlen

Originally posted by tonys
that seems like a reasonable plan-B,
especially when you're lacking Plan-A.

Never been on a military mission, have you? Secondary and tertiary objectives are always part of the overall plan.

Now see? Yer learning something for a change.

I'm not a poor-kid living in the projects, so no I have not and never will be 'on a military mission', unless you count paint-ball...now THAT was fun...

Okie-dokie. What was the objective of the game?

And what does where you're raised have to do with military experience?

[MadeinUSA]

Originally posted by tonys

Originally posted by madeinusa

Originally posted by tonys
boot-tay,

that would be 2 of them...making it 2 more than YOU.
There are people in the world with doctorate degrees who are completely ignorant when it comes to reasoning abilities in the real world.

Does having two degrees bring you closer to this plateau also?

I HIGHLY doubt you know of any individuals with Ph.D's, let alone the ignorant variety.

highly unlikely...

but, stranger things have happened.Actually, the university I went to required most professors to have a doctorate in order to be hired, but you aren't smart enough to take that hint and evaluate what I am trying to tell you.


For example: G'Dub'Ya wanted his next fantasy job to be Prez of the US...got it.... We will wake you up from your dreams if you start beating your head against the wall.

[tonys]

I HIGHLY doubt you know of any individuals with Ph.D's, let alone the ignorant variety.

[bootlen]

Originally posted by tonys

Originally posted by bootlen
Well, one of Saddam's right hand men said those weapons are in Syria.

the same guys telling the world they had them?

if 'true', go get them?

Oh, I forgot, the money spent on 'intelligence' doesn't afford spies within Syria...yet another rat-infested poor-house.



Intelligence resource is not so much a matter of budget as it is building those resources after Billy boy gutted it all.

[tonys]

I was waiting for your Clintonian Reference.

It took a while, though.

[MadeinUSA]

Originally posted by bootlen
And what does where you're raised have to do with military experience? I think he might be referring to the option and ability to run to England like billy if the need were to arise.

[Edited by madeinusa on 02-07-2006 at 04:10 PM]

[MadeinUSA]

Originally posted by tonys
Basically, you run around the forest pretenting you're Rambo and you shoot your opponent with a high-velocity ball of paint...it's real...and it's good.
isn't that what you are doing right now, pretending?

[bootlen]

Originally posted by tonys

Originally posted by bootlen

Originally posted by tonys

Originally posted by bootlen

Originally posted by tonys
that seems like a reasonable plan-B,
especially when you're lacking Plan-A.

Never been on a military mission, have you? Secondary and tertiary objectives are always part of the overall plan.

Now see? Yer learning something for a change.

I'm not a poor-kid living in the projects, so no I have not and never will be 'on a military mission', unless you count paint-ball...now THAT was fun...

Okie-dokie. What was the objective of the game?

Basically, you run around the forest pretenting you're Rambo and you shoot your opponent with a high-velocity ball of paint...it's real...and it's good.


Then basically, you weren't playing paint-ball. You were just wasting paint.

Usually, the objective is to capture your opponents "flag" before everybody on your team is "dead". And if, on your way to get that "flag" in your grubby l;ittle hands, you see an opponent hiding withour seeing you. Do you take him out or do you say, "My objective is to get to that 'flag', not 'kill' the enemy"?

If you have a brain cell in your head, you go ahead and take care of that secondary objective by "killing" the enemy.

Now, see? You learned a little bit more.

[bootlen]

Originally posted by madeinusa

Originally posted by tonys
Basically, you run around the forest pretenting you're Rambo and you shoot your opponent with a high-velocity ball of paint...it's real...and it's good.
isn't that what you are doing right now, pretending?

Modus operandi of the liberal. That and running and hiding.

[MadeinUSA]

Originally posted by tonys
Alright...

how about...when will somebody take-on, I mean REALLY take-on the Administration (all of them) for making such firm, confident statements about the WMDs.

now, made-in-china, don't get all confused by these 'words'
...but, I'm referring specifically to the selling job they did.
O.K. - if they made an honest mistake.
Fine...2,200 soldiers and 200 billion later...the US is left with rebuilding a 3rd world country...fine indeed.

But, at least do the honorable thing and admit YOU MESSED UP, and QUIT YOUR JOB.

(can you tell I have a problem with Rumsfield's actions before/after the invasion...?) You guys always seem to conveniently forget the UN resolution that gave the OK to use force after saddam REFUSED TO DISARM.

Are you really this ignorant, or just half stupid?

Keep studying for that doctorate, you already have your thesis in stupidity locked up with an A for the grade.

[bootlen]

Originally posted by tonys
I was waiting for your Clintonian Reference.

It took a while, though.

Just tryin' to keep ya 'tween the ditches, tony. You know...on the narrow path of truth.

[tonys]

narrow indeed.

[tonys]

Originally posted by madeinusa

Originally posted by tonys
Alright...

how about...when will somebody take-on, I mean REALLY take-on the Administration (all of them) for making such firm, confident statements about the WMDs.

now, made-in-china, don't get all confused by these 'words'
...but, I'm referring specifically to the selling job they did.
O.K. - if they made an honest mistake.
Fine...2,200 soldiers and 200 billion later...the US is left with rebuilding a 3rd world country...fine indeed.

But, at least do the honorable thing and admit YOU MESSED UP, and QUIT YOUR JOB.

(can you tell I have a problem with Rumsfield's actions before/after the invasion...?) You guys always seem to conveniently forget the UN resolution that gave the OK to use force after saddam REFUSED TO DISARM.

Are you really this ignorant, or just half stupid?

Keep studying for that doctorate, you already have your thesis in stupidity locked up with an A for the grade.



I HIGHLY doubt you know of any individuals with Ph.D's, let alone the ignorant variety.

[MadeinUSA]

Tony, when are you going to stop acting, being you are a tony, and show us some intelligence. This really is starting to get boring.

[tonys]

Boring?

I hijacked this thread 8-pages ago (more like rescued it from that boring topic posted by Jimmy-boy-man-love-8675309),
and kept the likes of you scurrying along, trying to figure out if a comment about pre-war planning is an actual reference to the same-old argument about UN resolutions, etc. etc.


That's not boring,
That's comedy!

[MadeinUSA]

Originally posted by tonys
I HIGHLY doubt you know of any individuals with Ph.D's, let alone the ignorant variety.
I don't want to give you a heart attack, but when I am at a gathering of highly intelligent people, I have never come up short in lacking the ability to draw a crowd for a stimulating conversation.

[tonys]

Originally posted by madeinusa

Originally posted by tonys
I HIGHLY doubt you know of any individuals with Ph.D's, let alone the ignorant variety.
I don't want to give you a heart attack, but when I am at a gathering of highly intelligent people, I have never come up short in lacking the ability to draw a crowd for a stimulating conversation.

it's AMAZING what goes on in strip-bars these days...

[bootlen]

Originally posted by tonys


it's AMAZING what goes on in strip-bars these days...

Really? Tell us about it.

[James 3528]

Originally posted by tonys
Boring?

I hijacked this thread 8-pages ago (more like rescued it from that boring topic posted by Jimmy-boy-man-love-8675309),
and kept the likes of you scurrying along, trying to figure out if a comment about pre-war planning is an actual reference to the same-old argument about UN resolutions, etc. etc.


That's not boring,
That's comedy!

LOL In 8 pages, you ain't said $hit

[MadeinUSA]

Originally posted by tonys
Boring?

I hijacked this thread 8-pages ago (more like rescued it from that boring topic posted by Jimmy-boy-man-love-8675309),
and kept the likes of you scurrying along, trying to figure out if a comment about pre-war planning is an actual reference to the same-old argument about UN resolutions, etc. etc.


That's not boring,
That's comedy! Really, and here I had you pegged for playing some war game on your X-Box.

[tonys]

Originally posted by bootlen

Originally posted by tonys


it's AMAZING what goes on in strip-bars these days...

Really? Tell us about it.

Apparently...these very stimulating people, not necessarily the strippers, gather large crowds with the regurgitation, almost a memorized dissertation, of the most recent Fox-News telecast.


Truly stunning.

[tonys]

Originally posted by James 3528

Originally posted by tonys
Boring?

I hijacked this thread 8-pages ago (more like rescued it from that boring topic posted by Jimmy-boy-man-love-8675309),
and kept the likes of you scurrying along, trying to figure out if a comment about pre-war planning is an actual reference to the same-old argument about UN resolutions, etc. etc.


That's not boring,
That's comedy!

LOL In 8 pages, you ain't said $hit

LOL

Jimmy-Carter-SUCKS-said-Jimmy...

now THAT's 'Deep'

LOL

[MadeinUSA]

Originally posted by tonys

Originally posted by madeinusa

Originally posted by tonys
I HIGHLY doubt you know of any individuals with Ph.D's, let alone the ignorant variety.
I don't want to give you a heart attack, but when I am at a gathering of highly intelligent people, I have never come up short in lacking the ability to draw a crowd for a stimulating conversation.

it's AMAZING what goes on in strip-bars these days... Unbeknown to you, the intelligent ones gravitate to social events, where intelligent people socialize. You keep going to the other end of society. It always takes two to spin the globe.

[tonys]

how much does it cost?

...a lap dance, that is.

[MadeinUSA]

Tony, you are like Heraldo and Jimmy these days, just not good enough to get your own act so you just regurgitate the same old garbage.

[MadeinUSA]

Originally posted by tonys
how much does it cost?

...a lap dance, that is. You do bring up a good point here. Maybe if your constituents would stay out of those places, you guys would be better rounded and able to contribute to worldly events that are at hand presently.

[bootlen]

Originally posted by tonys
Boring?

I hijacked this thread 8-pages ago (more like rescued it from that boring topic posted by Jimmy-boy-man-love-8675309),
and kept the likes of you scurrying along, trying to figure out if a comment about pre-war planning is an actual reference to the same-old argument about UN resolutions, etc. etc.


That's not boring,
That's comedy!

Now, now, made and James. Don't forget what the kids find hilarious on Saturday morning on TV is incredibly boring to you. So it is with tony...funny to him, boring to us.

[tonys]

Originally posted by madeinusa
Tony, you are like Heraldo and Jimmy these days, just not good enough to get your own act so you just regurgitate the same old garbage.

I HIGHLY doubt you know of any individuals with Ph.D's, let alone the ignorant variety.

[MadeinUSA]

Yeah, you are right Booty. A person can only watch a kid for a few minutes on Americas Funniest Home Videos, before it gets to be stupid.

[Edited by madeinusa on 02-07-2006 at 04:51 PM]

[MadeinUSA]

Originally posted by tonys

Originally posted by madeinusa
Tony, you are like Heraldo and Jimmy these days, just not good enough to get your own act so you just regurgitate the same old garbage.

I HIGHLY doubt you know of any individuals with Ph.D's, let alone the ignorant variety. You are aware they have online courses these days so you won't embarrass yourself in front of the class?

[johnl45]

Originally posted by bootlen
Hah! Carter...the guy who sent men to their death in the desert on a very poorly planned and miserably failed rescue mission.

What in God's name does he know about national security?

He should stick to picking peanuts and peeing in public. Sounds allot like Bush's M.O.

[bootlen]

Originally posted by johnl45

Originally posted by bootlen
Hah! Carter...the guy who sent men to their death in the desert on a very poorly planned and miserably failed rescue mission.

What in God's name does he know about national security?

He should stick to picking peanuts and peeing in public. Sounds allot like Bush's M.O.

Sorta. Except with W, the enemy dies. With W, missions are successful. With W, we don't have a peanut pinkin' idiot in the White House. Or any kind of idiot for that matter. Unless you wanna count the media at press conferences.

[chillbilly]

[QUOTE]Originally posted by tonys
[B]...actually, I'm a conservative who happens to find humor in "America - the Fox-News version".





Is that the source of your commentary? Fox and CNN?
Looks like Wolf Blitzer won't be calling you in to the situation room anytime soon.

[MadeinUSA]

Originally posted by johnl45

Originally posted by bootlen
Hah! Carter...the guy who sent men to their death in the desert on a very poorly planned and miserably failed rescue mission.

What in God's name does he know about national security?

He should stick to picking peanuts and peeing in public. Sounds allot like Bush's M.O. and here I thought you were the entertainment for the night.

[James 3528]

Jimmy Carter...Worthless Governor / Worthless President

[coolwhip]

James, your an instigator.:eek:;):D

[geerair]

Shrub Bush has already wrapped up America's Worst President designation and he still has years left to put the title well out of reach of future contenders.

[grog2]

carter..worthless pres...Bush..even worse..greatest scourge on humanity since Hitler..Bush is a criminal..a complete war monger of the highest kind..absolute puppet for Rice and Wolf etc..neo cons run the show and Bush is too stupid to realise and neither is half of the American population cos those stupid bastards re-elected the moron.

[MadeinUSA]

Originally posted by geerair
Shrub Bush has already wrapped up America's Worst President designation and he still has years left to put the title well out of reach of future contenders. Lowest interest rates in years.
More minorities own businesses than at any other time.
More minorities own houses than at any other time.
Has put more minorities in high positions than any democrat, or any republican ever has.
Long continued growth.
Lowest unemployment rate in years.

You really know how to make yourself look stupid don’t you.

Edit: Carter sealed the worst position today when he turned a Eulogy into political rhetoric.


[Edited by madeinusa on 02-08-2006 at 02:36 AM]

[James 3528]

Originally posted by grog2
carter..worthless pres...Bush..even worse..greatest scourge on humanity since Hitler..Bush is a criminal..a complete war monger of the highest kind..absolute puppet for Rice and Wolf etc..neo cons run the show and Bush is too stupid to realise and neither is half of the American population cos those stupid bastards re-elected the moron.

Oh Michael Moore's little brother. Was it hard getting anything to eat around him?

[bootlen]

Originally posted by grog2
carter..worthless pres...Bush..even worse..greatest scourge on humanity since Hitler..Bush is a criminal..a complete war monger of the highest kind..absolute puppet for Rice and Wolf etc..neo cons run the show and Bush is too stupid to realise and neither is half of the American population cos those stupid bastards re-elected the moron.

Here's something else that will tick you off...

Allah sucks.

Mohammed sucks.

Osama bin Laden is a practicing homosexual.

Enjoy.

[tonys]

You can add boy-diddler to the list of 'qualifications' for osama, boots.

...I can't wait for him to spend one evening in a US military jail (without cameras).
THAT will be a night to remember!

[James 3528]

Originally posted by tonys
You can add boy-diddler to the list of 'qualifications' for osama, boots.

...I can't wait for him to spend one evening in a US military jail (without cameras).
THAT will be a night to remember!

Did someone give you your body back today?

[tonys]

that's comedy.

[johnl45]

Originally posted by bootlen

Originally posted by johnl45

Originally posted by bootlen
Hah! Carter...the guy who sent men to their death in the desert on a very poorly planned and miserably failed rescue mission.

What in God's name does he know about national security?

He should stick to picking peanuts and peeing in public. Sounds allot like Bush's M.O.

Sorta. Except with W, the enemy dies. With W, missions are successful. With W, we don't have a peanut pinkin' idiot in the White House. Or any kind of idiot for that matter. Unless you wanna count the media at press conferences. What mission would that be?

[tonys]

I believe the Boot-tay is referring to the 'mission' that ended with G'Dub'Ya showing off and wasting tax payers money by landing a jet on an aircraft carrier with the infamous "mission accomplished" banner.
(part of the fantasy job agreement he made with the fed. goverment).

And, all of the hard-work that has followed in I-crack are merely 'details' for the Boot-tay and his cohorts.

[James 3528]

Almost as bad a Clinton's haircut that cost the taxpayers about $33,000 and flying Hillary to New York

[geerair]

Myth.

[chillbilly]

Or the men and helicopters (taxpayer money) we lost during Carter's Abbott and Costello mission to free hostages.

[geerair]

Originally posted by madeinusa Lowest interest rates in years.That would be Greenspan not Bush. Of course we may be seeing the consequences of low interest rates soon.


More minorities own businesses than at any other time.Thanks again to Greenspan and Clinton era policies.


More minorities own houses than at any other time.Again Greenspan



Long continued growth.We will see if that growth is continued. As of now the alleged Bush growth is neither as long lived or as robust as that of the Clinton era.





Lowest unemployment rate in years.A consequence of using the less accurate Household Survey and is artifically lowered by the fact that a large number of jobless have despaired of ever finding a job and have stopped looking thus lowering the unemployment rate.







You really know how to make yourself look stupid don’t you.My friend your continual quoting of Bush talking points raises the question "are you intellectually lazy or are you merely unable to muster the intellectual capacity to think for yourself?" Personally, I suspect the latter as your post clearly shows that you understand very little about economic issues.

[hvacpope]

how about the 25,000 Cubans criminals that Castro sent us in 1980, another of jimmy greatest moments,the mariel boatlift, the more you think about him, the more you hate the moron.

[bootlen]

Would it be gauche to laugh at the mentally handicapped? I'm just about to bust a gut because of geer.

[MadeinUSA]

Originally posted by geerair

Originally posted by madeinusa Lowest interest rates in years.That would be Greenspan not Bush. Of course we may be seeing the consequences of low interest rates soon.


More minorities own businesses than at any other time.Thanks again to Greenspan and Clinton era policies.


More minorities own houses than at any other time.Again Greenspan



Long continued growth.We will see if that growth is continued. As of now the alleged Bush growth is neither as long lived or as robust as that of the Clinton era.





Lowest unemployment rate in years.A consequence of using the less accurate Household Survey and is artifically lowered by the fact that a large number of jobless have despaired of ever finding a job and have stopped looking thus lowering the unemployment rate.







You really know how to make yourself look stupid don’t you.My friend your continual quoting of Bush talking points raises the question "are you intellectually lazy or are you merely unable to muster the intellectual capacity to think for yourself?" Personally, I suspect the latter as your post clearly shows that you understand very little about economic issues.
I know this is hard for your limited intelligence to understand, but the man at the top always gets credit for accomplishments on his watch, be it in the private sector or the government sector.

You are just like any other lib. You are not man enough to accept the cold hard facts.

Here is a clue for you to digest, if the economy was not performing so well, those minority businesses and houses would not be happening right now, I don’t care what policies were passed under clintonian. It is Bush’s policies and actions during his first term driving this economy now bozo, not anything clintonian did, but then again, you need intelligence to understand this aspect.

Go eat crow.

[geerair]

Drivel. Your sophistication in economic matters just barely qualifies you to run a lemonade stand.

[Edited by geerair on 02-08-2006 at 04:39 PM]

[MadeinUSA]

Originally posted by geerair
Drivel. Your sophistication in economic matters just barely qualifies you to run a lemonade stand.

[Edited by geerair on 02-08-2006 at 04:39 PM] Atleast I know how to run the stand, can't say you even know how to make the sign.

[geerair]

Originally posted by madeinusa

Originally posted by geerair
Drivel. Your sophistication in economic matters just barely qualifies you to run a lemonade stand.

[Edited by geerair on 02-08-2006 at 04:39 PM] Atleast I know how to run the stand, can't say you even know how to make the sign. I would leave that to the sign makers. See, delegation of tasks to the appropriate artisan is vital in any well run organization and is a profound business axiom. It has the literal effect of freeing up valuable time for the CEO to attend to more important matters. While you are fumbling around trying to peddle glasses of lemonade, I am planning for my franchise expansion.

[MadeinUSA]

Originally posted by geerair

Originally posted by madeinusa

Originally posted by geerair
Drivel. Your sophistication in economic matters just barely qualifies you to run a lemonade stand.

[Edited by geerair on 02-08-2006 at 04:39 PM] Atleast I know how to run the stand, can't say you even know how to make the sign. I would leave that to the sign makers. See, delegation of tasks to the appropriate artisan is vital in any well run organization and is a profound business axiom. It has the literal effect of freeing up valuable time for the CEO to attend to more important matters. While you are fumbling around trying to peddle glasses of lemonade, I am planning for my franchise expansion. Only someone who is completely out of touch would start talking about macro-management and CEO agenda when the topic was a lemonade stand.

I was not impressed.

[geerair]

Originally posted by madeinusa
Only someone who is completely out of touch would start talking about macro-management and CEO agenda when the topic was a lemonade stand.

I was not impressed.That is why you are smalltime and will remain so. You have no scope or vision.

[jrn wireman]

Jimmy Carter was the best president we had in the last 40 years. If we would have followed his lead in dealing with the countrys of the middle east there would not have been a 9-11.

The problems we have in the middle east come from our predatory brand of capitalism. So much poverty for the benifit of so few. They make us believe that their resources should be ours even if we have to kill to get them. But that idea is a smoke screen what they are really after is more profit. Their greed far exceeds our ability to see thru smoke.

Carter spoke 27 years before Bush about weaning us from middle east oil. Where would we be today if we had taken up his ideas of energy independence,or finding alternative fuels. About conservation and better fuel economy. New technologies, like fuel cells and hydrogen, that would be more efficient and would pollute our enviroment less.

Many people posting at this site go on and on about their religion and their God and how Jesus will return soon to redeem those who believe. And yet they find it easy to criticize this person who truely carrys water for Jesus.

[James 3528]

Oh please. You gave me the $hits.

[MadeinUSA]

Originally posted by geerair

Originally posted by madeinusa
Only someone who is completely out of touch would start talking about macro-management and CEO agenda when the topic was a lemonade stand.

I was not impressed.That is why you are smalltime and will remain so. You have no scope or vision.
Oh boy, Mr. NowitALL. I surely don't see you over in business and marketing giving any sound business advice bozo.

[bootlen]

Originally posted by jrn wireman
Jimmy Carter was the best president we had in the last 40 years. If we would have followed his lead in dealing with the countrys of the middle east there would not have been a 9-11.

Who are you trying to kid beside yourself? Jimma couldn't lead a hungry dog to a prime rib.

The problems we have in the middle east come from our predatory brand of capitalism. So much poverty for the benifit of so few. They make us believe that their resources should be ours even if we have to kill to get them. But that idea is a smoke screen what they are really after is more profit. Their greed far exceeds our ability to see thru smoke.

Carter spoke 27 years before Bush about weaning us from middle east oil. Where would we be today if we had taken up his ideas of energy independence,or finding alternative fuels. About conservation and better fuel economy. New technologies, like fuel cells and hydrogen, that would be more efficient and would pollute our enviroment less.

I agree with Jimma on our dependence on ME oil but, like I said, he had zilch leadership ability and our dependence on that oil grew during his term.

And why are we still dependent on that oil? Because you and your ilk (1) do not allow for drilling oil rich territories; (2) put forth impossible to meet regulatory laws for non-petro sources of energy. Those have been our problem since alternative sources have been considered. Typical liberal crap.

Many people posting at this site go on and on about their religion and their God and how Jesus will return soon to redeem those who believe. And yet they find it easy to criticize this person who truely carrys water for Jesus.

Jimma is not a believer, wireman. He calls God a liar. A Sunday school teacher, huh? Right. Just because you sit in a garage all day don't make you a Chevrolet. He's a false prophet teaching lies from the very pit of hell.

Stay in your fog if you like. But don't say you weren't told.

[geerair]

Originally posted by madeinusa
Oh boy, Mr. NowitALL. I surely don't see you over in business and marketing giving any sound business advice bozo. I was handing out advice here for years while you were over at windowunit.com

[tonys]

you get a LOT of credit when you go with the "bozo" lingo...not surprising, though.

[bootlen]

Originally posted by geerair
I was handing out advice here for years...

Much to our chagrin.

[geerair]

Originally posted by bootlen
Much to our chagrin. You were over at holyrollers.com newbie.

[bootlen]

Originally posted by geerair

Originally posted by bootlen
Much to our chagrin. You were over at holyrollers.com newbie.

Maybe so. Maybe no. But one would think that with all your "experience" and "time in country" you'd have learned something. One would be wrong.

[geerair]

Originally posted by bootlen
Maybe so. Maybe no.Don't you know where you were? Have that checked out.



But one would think that with all your "experience" and "time in country" you'd have learned something. One would be wrong.The pertinent question is "does one think?" We have yet to see evidence of that.

[MadeinUSA]

Originally posted by geerair

Originally posted by madeinusa
Oh boy, Mr. NowitALL. I surely don't see you over in business and marketing giving any sound business advice bozo. I was handing out advice here for years while you were over at windowunit.com What's the matter did they run you out because otherwise you would still be in there giving advice if it was logical and sound?

I mean seriously, as lost as you are in here, I can't really see you not tripping over your own two feet in other areas.

[MadeinUSA]

Originally posted by tonys
you get a LOT of credit when you go with the "bozo" lingo...not surprising, though. Sometimes you have to lower your communication skills to the lower level of the individual you are dealing with, you know, like yourself included.

[tonys]

I HIGHLY doubt you know of any individuals with Ph.D's, let alone the ignorant variety.

[bootlen]

Originally posted by geerair
[QUOTE] Originally posted by bootlen
Maybe so. Maybe no.Don't you know where you were? Have that checked out.

Oh, I know exactly where I was. It's you who does not know (now that is typical)and I was just confirming that fact.

[geerair]

Originally posted by madeinusa

I mean seriously, as lost as you are in here, I can't really see you not tripping over your own two feet in other areas. Bawhahahahahah. From what I've read you are a laughingstock in most areas of this forum. The best you can muster in this area by way of intellectual argument is of the "Your mother wears army boots" variety.

BTW-Have you found that law yet?

[geerair]

Originally posted by bootlen

Oh, I know exactly where I was. It's you who does not know (now that is typical)and I was just confirming that fact. Bawhahahahahah. Pathetically weak. Go fill up your tank, you are running on fumes.

[bootlen]

Originally posted by geerair

Originally posted by bootlen

Oh, I know exactly where I was. It's you who does not know (now that is typical)and I was just confirming that fact. Bawhahahahahah. Pathetically weak. Go fill up your tank, you are running on fumes.

What? No refutation?

[geerair]

Originally posted by tonys
I HIGHLY doubt you know of any individuals with Ph.D's, let alone the ignorant variety. Judging from the wit displayed here by maiden, him and his intellectual equals must be a real Algonquin Round Table. :D:D:D

[geerair]

Originally posted by bootlen

What? No refutation? Bawhahahahaha. Even weaker. Better start coasting to that filling station.

[bootlen]

Originally posted by geerair

Originally posted by bootlen

What? No refutation? Bawhahahahaha. Even weaker. Better start coasting to that filling station.

Still no refutation?

[geerair]

Originally posted by bootlen
Still no refutation?Bawhahahahaha. Repetitively weak. Better open the door and start pushing with your feet.

[MadeinUSA]

Originally posted by geerair

Originally posted by madeinusa

I mean seriously, as lost as you are in here, I can't really see you not tripping over your own two feet in other areas. Bawhahahahahah. From what I've read you are a laughingstock in most areas of this forum. The best you can muster in this area by way of intellectual argument is of the "Your mother wears army boots" variety.

BTW-Have you found that law yet? Yes, people that normally walk around laughing without proving you wrong are not a very good challenge. You seem to fill that billing quite well.

OH, as far as the law, the Supreme Court is about to correct its own mistake.


Sure is funny how you bring up the Army boots comparison, being how my mind does not think that way. Obviously yours does as you so noted.

[geerair]

Originally posted by madeinusa
Yes, people that normally walk around laughing without proving you wrong are not a very good challenge. 1.3 billion Chinese can't be wrong.


OH, as far as the law, the Supreme Court is about to correct its own mistake. Still can't locate that law I see.



Sure is funny how you bring up the Army boots comparison, being how my mind does not think that way. Houston, we have confirmation that maiden doesn't think before he types. Knock us down with a feather.

[rob10]

Was a blatant DUMBA##!! No surprise, he is from Georgia!! What can you expect from that podunk state anyway!! On the other hand, GW is just as stupid and arogantly crooked!!

[bootlen]

Originally posted by geerair

Originally posted by bootlen
Still no refutation?Bawhahahahaha. Repetitively weak. Better open the door and start pushing with your feet.

And no refutation yet!

[bootlen]

Originally posted by rob10
Was a blatant DUMBA##!! No surprise, he is from Georgia!! What can you expect from that podunk state anyway!! On the other hand, GW is just as stupid and arogantly crooked!!

Ticked about it, huh?

This'll get under YOUR nails, too...

Hilary is a lesbian.

[geerair]

Originally posted by bootlen

And no refutation yet!Bawhahahahah. Abandoned vehicle, on foot.

[bootlen]

Originally posted by geerair

Originally posted by bootlen

And no refutation yet!Bawhahahahah. Abandoned vehicle, on foot.

And still no refutation.

[geerair]

Originally posted by bootlen

And still no refutation. Bawhahahahahah. Limping.

[bootlen]

Originally posted by geerair

Originally posted by bootlen

And still no refutation. Bawhahahahahah. Limping.

And still without refutation.

[geerair]

Originally posted by bootlen


And still without refutation.Shoulders slumping under the weight of repetition. Bawhahahahahhah

[bootlen]

Originally posted by geerair

Originally posted by bootlen


And still without refutation.Shoulders slumping under the weight of repetition. Bawhahahahahhah

The dude is eat up with non-refutation.

[geerair]

Originally posted by bootlen

The dude is eat up with non-refutation.Whoa, Bootie's legs are cramping, explains the limp. Bawhahahahahah

[rob10]

Originally posted by bootlen

Originally posted by rob10
Was a blatant DUMBA##!! No surprise, he is from Georgia!! What can you expect from that podunk state anyway!! On the other hand, GW is just as stupid and arogantly crooked!!

Ticked about it, huh?

This'll get under YOUR nails, too...

Hilary is a lesbian.

Lesbians turn me on!! :D

[bootlen]

Originally posted by geerair

Originally posted by bootlen

The dude is eat up with non-refutation.Whoa, Bootie's legs are cramping, explains the limp. Bawhahahahahah

There you have it folks. Geer has no refutation.

[geerair]

Originally posted by bootlen

There you have it folks. Geer has no refutation.And with that Bootie falls in the dirt, out of energy, relevence and wit, bereft of any speck of coherence but an overabundant supply of plagiarized repetition.







RIP Bootie.

[Edited by geerair on 02-10-2006 at 12:30 PM]

[bootlen]

Originally posted by geerair

Originally posted by bootlen

There you have it folks. Geer has no refutation.And with that Bootie falls in the dirt, out of energy, relevence and wit, bereft of any speck of coherence but an overabundant supply of plagiarized repetition.







RIP Bootie.

[Edited by geerair on 02-10-2006 at 12:30 PM]

:D Not hardly.

And you still have no refutation.

[geerair]

Originally posted by bootlen

:D Not hardly.

And you still have no refutation. Bawhahahahah. Involuntary movement. Enjoy your reward.

[bootlen]

Originally posted by geerair

Originally posted by bootlen

:D Not hardly.

And you still have no refutation. Bawhahahahah. Involuntary movement. Enjoy your reward.

How embarrassed you must be. No. Wait. You probably are not. You are probably like the guy who popped a top during a funeral and when everybody stared back at you, you said, "WHA-AT!"

And still no refutation.

[geerair]

Originally posted by bootlen

How embarrassed you must be. No. Wait. You probably are not. You are probably like the guy who popped a top during a funeral and when everybody stared back at you, you said, "WHA-AT!"

And still no refutation. What was that? A fart? Oh, just a flatulent post mortem explosion of rancid Bootie gas. Bawhawawawaw.

[bootlen]

Originally posted by geerair

Originally posted by bootlen

How embarrassed you must be. No. Wait. You probably are not. You are probably like the guy who popped a top during a funeral and when everybody stared back at you, you said, "WHA-AT!"

And still no refutation. What was that? A fart? Oh, just a flatulent post mortem explosion of rancid Bootie gas. Bawhawawawaw.

And geer is yet without refutation.

[geerair]

Originally posted by bootlen
What was that? A fart? Oh, just a flatulent post mortem explosion of rancid Bootie gas. Bawhawawawaw. [/B][/QUOTE]

And geer is yet without refutation. [/quote]There it is again. Turn on the fans. The remains of Bootie are full of noxious gas. Bawhahahahahah

[bootlen]

Originally posted by geerair

Originally posted by bootlen
What was that? A fart? Oh, just a flatulent post mortem explosion of rancid Bootie gas. Bawhawawawaw.

And geer is yet without refutation. [/quote]There it is again. Turn on the fans. The remains of Bootie are full of noxious gas. Bawhahahahahah [/B][/QUOTE]

What? I'm sorry. Did you say something? You did? And again with no refutation.

Must be a habit.

[geerair]

Originally posted by bootlen
What? I'm sorry. Did you say something? You did? And again with no refutation.

Must be a habit.More gas from the bootie corpse. Bawhahahahahah

[bootlen]

Originally posted by geerair

Originally posted by bootlen
What? I'm sorry. Did you say something? You did? And again with no refutation.

Must be a habit.More gas from the bootie corpse. Bawhahahahahah

On and on and on and still no refutation.

[geerair]

Originally posted by bootlen

On and on and on and still no refutation.Wow, bootie's last meal was heavy on the beans!!!!!

[bootlen]

Originally posted by geerair

Originally posted by bootlen

On and on and on and still no refutation.Wow, bootie's last meal was heavy on the beans!!!!!

Why am I not surprised geer has no refutation? Because he never has one.

[geerair]

Originally posted by bootlen



Why am I not surprised geer has no refutation? Because he never has one. What is that noise? Ah, just scavengers picking the bones clean.

[bootlen]

Originally posted by geerair

Originally posted by bootlen



Why am I not surprised geer has no refutation? Because he never has one. What is that noise? Ah, just scavengers picking the bones clean.

And geer still without refutation.

[geerair]

Originally posted by bootlen
And geer still without refutation. Picked clean and bleaching in the sun.

[bootlen]

Originally posted by geerair

Originally posted by bootlen
And geer still without refutation. Picked clean and bleaching in the sun.

And still awaiting refutation, which, of course, is not forthcoming.

[geerair]

Originally posted by bootlen

Originally posted by geerair

Originally posted by bootlen
And geer still without refutation. Picked clean and bleaching in the sun.

And still awaiting refutation, which, of course, is not forthcoming. Bawhahahahahah. Bones are fossilizing.

[bootlen]

Originally posted by geerair

Originally posted by bootlen

Originally posted by geerair

Originally posted by bootlen
And geer still without refutation. Picked clean and bleaching in the sun.

And still awaiting refutation, which, of course, is not forthcoming. Bawhahahahahah. Bones are fossilizing.

And a new record has been set for number of posts without refutation.

[geerair]

I forgot Bootie, what was it I am supposed to be refuting?

[bootlen]

:D

Geer...eatin' makes 'im sleepy and sleepin' makes 'im hungry and to hell with all else.

And naturally, still no refutation.

[geerair]

Originally posted by bootlen
:D

Geer...eatin' makes 'im sleepy and sleepin' makes 'im hungry and to hell with all else.

And naturally, still no refutation. That's true, especially turkey. Bawhahahahaha.

Now, to save us all some time and bandwidth, what exactly is it that you are obsessed about? Nothing obvious pops up in reviewing the thread.

[bootlen]

Originally posted by geerair

Originally posted by bootlen
:D

Geer...eatin' makes 'im sleepy and sleepin' makes 'im hungry and to hell with all else.

And naturally, still no refutation. That's true, especially turkey. Bawhahahahaha.

Now, to save us all some time and bandwidth, what exactly is it that you are obsessed about? Nothing obvious pops up in reviewing the thread.


Since when did you become concerned about wasting bandwidth? Everything you post is a waste of bandwidth.

To answer your question...pg. 14...7th post. But you haven't refuted anything else on this thread either.

[geerair]

Originally posted by bootlen

Originally posted by geerair

Originally posted by bootlen
:D

Geer...eatin' makes 'im sleepy and sleepin' makes 'im hungry and to hell with all else.

And naturally, still no refutation. That's true, especially turkey. Bawhahahahaha.

Now, to save us all some time and bandwidth, what exactly is it that you are obsessed about? Nothing obvious pops up in reviewing the thread.


Since when did you become concerned about wasting bandwidth? Everything you post is a waste of bandwidth.

To answer your question...pg. 14...7th post. But you haven't refuted anything else on this thread either. What is it specifically that has you obsessing now for days?

[bootlen]

Originally posted by geerair
What is it specifically that has you obsessing now for days?

Obsessing? Me? I'm just playing your little game by your rules and you're losing.

Why? Ya gettin' tired?

[geerair]

Originally posted by bootlen

Originally posted by geerair
What is it specifically that has you obsessing now for days?

Obsessing? Me? I'm just playing your little game by your rules and you're losing.

Why? Ya gettin' tired?

What is it that is bothering you? I'll be glad to clear it up if you will tell me. I hate to see my fellow man suffering.

[bootlen]

Originally posted by geerair

Originally posted by bootlen

Originally posted by geerair
What is it specifically that has you obsessing now for days?

Obsessing? Me? I'm just playing your little game by your rules and you're losing.

Why? Ya gettin' tired?

What is it that is bothering you? I'll be glad to clear it up if you will tell me. I hate to see my fellow man suffering.

Bothering me? Suffering? Geer, you simply have to do something about that projection.

[geerair]

posted by bootlen

Bothering me? Suffering? Your obsessive addiction to repeating yourself on a trivial matter says differently. You are crying out for help. Let us help you.

Now, what refutation are you referring to and why is this such an overwhelmingly important matter to you?

[bootlen]

Originally posted by geerair

posted by bootlen

Bothering me? Suffering? Your obsessive addiction to repeating yourself on a trivial matter says differently. You are crying out for help. Let us help you.

Now, what refutation are you referring to and why is this such an overwhelmingly important matter to you?

Well, now. This explains a lot. You can't read. I apologize for having made fun of you previously. Maybe you can take some night school classes and get a GED!

[geerair]

Originally posted by bootlen


Well, now. This explains a lot. You can't read. I apologize for having made fun of you previously. Maybe you can take some night school classes and get a GED!Oh dear, you are worse off than I thought. You will require a specially trained team.

[bootlen]

Originally posted by geerair

Originally posted by bootlen


Well, now. This explains a lot. You can't read. I apologize for having made fun of you previously. Maybe you can take some night school classes and get a GED!Oh dear, you are worse off than I thought. You will require a specially trained team.

No, no, no. I'm not going to teach you in your night classes, with or without a specially trained team. You will be attending classes at an already existing school.

[geerair]

Originally posted by bootlen
No, no, no. I'm not going to teach you in your night classes, with or without a specially trained team. You will be attending classes at an already existing school. I think a transactional psych man, two pre-natal history compilers, three Oedipal complex experts and two behavioralists will just about do it for Boots. Might take years but we are here for you boots. Good luck.

[bootlen]

Originally posted by geerair

Originally posted by bootlen
No, no, no. I'm not going to teach you in your night classes, with or without a specially trained team. You will be attending classes at an already existing school. I think a transactional psych man, two pre-natal history compilers, three Oedipal complex experts and two behavioralists will just about do it for Boots. Might take years but we are here for you boots. Good luck.

I already told ya, geer. I'm not going to be part of your treatment, either. I may send Dick over to slap ya around a little but that's only if you've been good. So 7 or 8 years of therapy should put ya on the road to a GED.

[geerair]

Originally posted by bootlen

Originally posted by geerair

Originally posted by bootlen
No, no, no. I'm not going to teach you in your night classes, with or without a specially trained team. You will be attending classes at an already existing school. I think a transactional psych man, two pre-natal history compilers, three Oedipal complex experts and two behavioralists will just about do it for Boots. Might take years but we are here for you boots. Good luck.

I already told ya, geer. I'm not going to be part of your treatment, either. I may send Dick over to slap ya around a little but that's only if you've been good. So 7 or 8 years of therapy should put ya on the road to a GED. Oh yeah, once we get booties underlying pathologies cleared up we'll need a good OCD man. Cheer up.

[bootlen]

Originally posted by geerair

Originally posted by bootlen

Originally posted by geerair

Originally posted by bootlen
No, no, no. I'm not going to teach you in your night classes, with or without a specially trained team. You will be attending classes at an already existing school. I think a transactional psych man, two pre-natal history compilers, three Oedipal complex experts and two behavioralists will just about do it for Boots. Might take years but we are here for you boots. Good luck.

I already told ya, geer. I'm not going to be part of your treatment, either. I may send Dick over to slap ya around a little but that's only if you've been good. So 7 or 8 years of therapy should put ya on the road to a GED. Oh yeah, once we get booties underlying pathologies cleared up we'll need a good OCD man. Cheer up.

And we'll certainly have to address your projectionism.

[geerair]

Originally posted by bootlen

And we'll certainly have to address your projectionism.Not a problem anymore. I'm soft-spoken but with modern PA systems my voice can carry even in the largest venues.

[bootlen]

Originally posted by geerair

Originally posted by bootlen

And we'll certainly have to address your projectionism.Not a problem anymore. I'm soft-spoken but with modern PA systems my voice can carry even in the largest venues.

U-u-h huh.