View Full Version : Help me clean up a hack job.
jpsmith1cm
04-23-2010, 10:37 PM
Had to deal with a pretty bad hack job today, and am looking for a bit of help cleaning up.
Walk-in meat cooler. 401a
2 bohn WKE100BC evaps with EBFFE-A-C txv (R-12)
Tecumseh Condensing unit
Model CL312HT
Serial 6M832629
Now, here is where it goes bad.
Somewhere along the lines, someone decided to change out the original compressor with a Copeland CS33K6E-PFV-979.
Now, the compressor failed overnight and I replaced it, like-for-like today. THEN I find out that the compressor is a 404a pump on a 401a system.
I talked this over with the boss and we decided on this plan of action. Next time anyone has to touch the refrigeration system, we replace TXVs and change out to either 402a or 404a depending on the oil in the system.
Thought, suggestions, and input please.
750valve
04-24-2010, 04:19 AM
Not sure about that condensing unit but all evaps will gain capacity on a change to R404a (only need to worry about a new TXV), I am unfamiliar with the condensing unit you have - the only worry i would have is the THR of the condenser coil on R404a, if its OK then first thing monday I would be back with TXV, a tin of POE, driers and a bottle of 404a.
icemeister
04-24-2010, 09:43 AM
After a little digging I found that the original condensing unit model must have been a CL31ZH17 as it's fairly easy to misread some of these older numbers. ;)
The original compressor then would have been an AGA4534AXN which is in fact a 3 HP HT R12 pump rated at about 20,000 Btuh @ +20ºF SST. Each evaporator is rated at 10,000 Btuh @ 10ºF TD so the match was a good one for a 30ºF (or so) meat box.
So where did the CS33K6E come from?
Well, applying a little more refrigeration forensics, I found that a typical 3 HP R12 HT pump would have a displacement of 700-800 CFH. (I couldn't find the displacement of the original Tecumseh.) The CS33K6E has a displacement of 756 CFH, so running it on R12, or in this case R401A, the resulting capacity should be approximately the same as the original.
As a secondary check, the CS33K6E is rated at about 31,000 Btuh @ +20ºF SST with R404A. My rule of thumb for R12 performance says that the capacity should be about 2/3 of what it would be running R22 or R404A HT (2/3 x 31,000 Btuh = 20,460 Btuh).
So in the end, it's really not a bad match. It was likely a necessary and somewhat creative hack to save a boxload of meat...and sounds like something I might do in a pinch. ;)
I see another possible scenario here too, that being it may have been a totally misinformed selection that turned out roses. It's quite possible that a counter guy at the supply house looked up the Tecumseh number and found it had a HT rating of 33,000 Btuh, so he simply selected a 3 HP HT Copeland without considering the refrigerant difference or the fact that the while CS is a HT compressor the "33" in the model number is taken at +20ºF and not at +45ºF as the Tecumseh is. I've seen them do it several times.
I simply love a good mystery, don't you. :)
jpsmith1cm
04-24-2010, 12:33 PM
SO, despite appearances, this is NOT quite the mis-match that I originally thought?
Thank you for your input, icemeister.
icemeister
04-24-2010, 01:13 PM
Yep, it looks like a decent matchup to me, however convoluted it may appear.
I forgot to comment on the last statement you made yesterday:
I talked this over with the boss and we decided on this plan of action. Next time anyone has to touch the refrigeration system, we replace TXVs and change out to either 402a or 404a depending on the oil in the system.
I'm assuming when you fired up this new CS33 it was with R401A and settled in at around 15-20 psig suction and 150-175 psig discharge...or just as one would expect for R401A on a meat box.
If this is so, then if you were to retrofit this system to R402A or R404A the compressor would attempt to do about 50% more in capacity than it is right now on R401A. The evaps and the condenser aren't big enough for that.
The better plan of attack for this system would be to go back and retrofit it to R134A when such an opportunity arises.
It's funny how some stuff happens....
A couple of years ago I had a restaurant customer who was setting up a high end Italian bistro style restaurant. The existing place had a 6' x 8' walk-in freezer that he wanted to convert to a cooler, but he didn't want to spend a lot of money if he didn't have to. So I checked the existing R404A condensing unit/evap match and looked into how they would balance out if I converted to R134A. It looked pretty good except for a slightly higher TD on the evap than I'd like but since it was for chilled bottled beer and wine the lower RH wasn't going to be a problem. Other than a little rewiring of the evap, I only had to install a new filter-drier and change the powerhead to a FC charge as the valve port size was OK either way.
This week I got to change it back to a freezer again because he's going to New Orleans/Cajun family style theme. :)
powell
04-24-2010, 01:31 PM
Let me add to the mix.
The Copeland CS33K3E-PFV is rated for R404A and R134a.
The R134a ratings: 36,500 @ 45/130/65/130
18,400 @ 20/120/65/120
The new Copeland replacement for this model is a CS33K6E-PFV.
The difference between the "3" and "6" is listed as a model variation with no explanation. Copeland shows the "6" replacing the "3" so there should'nt be any problems.
Copeland also list the CS33 as the replacement for the Tecumseh AGA4534AXN.
Also, according to Copelands chart, R401A/MP39 is approved for POE use.
I would suspect that the Copeland failed for the same reasons as the original Tecumseh.
jpsmith1cm
04-24-2010, 01:40 PM
Thanks, guys.
I should have kept that old pump and cut it open...
K_Neil
04-24-2010, 09:20 PM
Yep, it looks like a decent matchup to me, however convoluted it may appear.
I forgot to comment on the last statement you made yesterday:
I'm assuming when you fired up this new CS33 it was with R401A and settled in at around 15-20 psig suction and 150-175 psig discharge...or just as one would expect for R401A on a meat box.
If this is so, then if you were to retrofit this system to R402A or R404A the compressor would attempt to do about 50% more in capacity than it is right now on R401A. The evaps and the condenser aren't big enough for that.
The better plan of attack for this system would be to go back and retrofit it to R134A when such an opportunity arises.
It's funny how some stuff happens....
A couple of years ago I had a restaurant customer who was setting up a high end Italian bistro style restaurant. The existing place had a 6' x 8' walk-in freezer that he wanted to convert to a cooler, but he didn't want to spend a lot of money if he didn't have to. So I checked the existing R404A condensing unit/evap match and looked into how they would balance out if I converted to R134A. It looked pretty good except for a slightly higher TD on the evap than I'd like but since it was for chilled bottled beer and wine the lower RH wasn't going to be a problem. Other than a little rewiring of the evap, I only had to install a new filter-drier and change the powerhead to a FC charge as the valve port size was OK either way.
This week I got to change it back to a freezer again because he's going to New Orleans/Cajun family style theme. :)
Cool today freezer tomorrow with an extended forcast of continueing below freezing temperatures. Sorry couldn't resist that one.
surenuff
04-25-2010, 01:57 AM
Thanks, guys.
I should have kept that old pump and cut it open...
Oh Gosh JP, don't say that, you will have a bunch of guys come tell you how stupid it is for wanting to cut it open and see what killed it. I said on another thread a few days ago that I like to cut them open when I have the time or really want to inspect one. Some had never heard of such a thing, and others said the didn't care what killed it.
Dowadudda
04-25-2010, 07:35 AM
After a little digging I found that the original condensing unit model must have been a CL31ZH17 as it's fairly easy to misread some of these older numbers. ;)
The original compressor then would have been an AGA4534AXN which is in fact a 3 HP HT R12 pump rated at about 20,000 Btuh @ +20ºF SST. Each evaporator is rated at 10,000 Btuh @ 10ºF TD so the match was a good one for a 30ºF (or so) meat box.
So where did the CS33K6E come from?
Well, applying a little more refrigeration forensics, I found that a typical 3 HP R12 HT pump would have a displacement of 700-800 CFH. (I couldn't find the displacement of the original Tecumseh.) The CS33K6E has a displacement of 756 CFH, so running it on R12, or in this case R401A, the resulting capacity should be approximately the same as the original.
As a secondary check, the CS33K6E is rated at about 31,000 Btuh @ +20ºF SST with R404A. My rule of thumb for R12 performance says that the capacity should be about 2/3 of what it would be running R22 or R404A HT (2/3 x 31,000 Btuh = 20,460 Btuh).
So in the end, it's really not a bad match. It was likely a necessary and somewhat creative hack to save a boxload of meat...and sounds like something I might do in a pinch. ;)
I see another possible scenario here too, that being it may have been a totally misinformed selection that turned out roses. It's quite possible that a counter guy at the supply house looked up the Tecumseh number and found it had a HT rating of 33,000 Btuh, so he simply selected a 3 HP HT Copeland without considering the refrigerant difference or the fact that the while CS is a HT compressor the "33" in the model number is taken at +20ºF and not at +45ºF as the Tecumseh is. I've seen them do it several times.
I simply love a good mystery, don't you. :)
Okay. If you would. Explain how you do this. I have never met another refrigeration man do this so methodically. Seriously.
I wanna know where you got the info. And how were you able to assemble this info so quickly.
icemeister
04-25-2010, 08:20 AM
Okay. If you would. Explain how you do this. I have never met another refrigeration man do this so methodically. Seriously.
I wanna know where you got the info. And how were you able to assemble this info so quickly.
LOL... I like Powell's method better. It's much easier. ;)
I found the old Tecumseh compressor info in a United Refrigeration catalog from 1994 that I had on the shelf at the shop. The Tecumseh capacity I got from a Johnstone catalog. The Copeland info was all from their website.
Comparing compressor displacements and playing around with different refrigerant ratings came from being an applications engineer for Dunham-Bush many years ago. I learned a lot working there.
Also remember that until the demise of R12 and R502, compressors were typically dual rated for HT12/LT502. The same is true for R134A and R404A...it's just that they don't publish it anymore.
Freezeking2000
04-25-2010, 08:42 AM
LOL... I like Powell's method better. It's much easier. ;)
I found the old Tecumseh compressor info in a United Refrigeration catalog from 1994 that I had on the shelf at the shop. The Tecumseh capacity I got from a Johnstone catalog. The Copeland info was all from their website.
Comparing compressor displacements and playing around with different refrigerant ratings came from being an applications engineer for Dunham-Bush many years ago. I learned a lot working there.
Also remember that until the demise of R12 and R502, compressors were typically dual rated for HT12/LT502. The same is true for R134A and R404A...it's just that they don't publish it anymore.
Great information to share. I have never had an issue with any R-22 or 404 rated compressor running R-134/ MP-39 refrigerant. I have also questioned replacement compressors selected by United in the past due to the rating on the pump or condenser.
crackertech
04-25-2010, 02:52 PM
LOL... I like Powell's method better. It's much easier. ;)
I found the old Tecumseh compressor info in a United Refrigeration catalog from 1994 that I had on the shelf at the shop. The Tecumseh capacity I got from a Johnstone catalog. The Copeland info was all from their website.
Comparing compressor displacements and playing around with different refrigerant ratings came from being an applications engineer for Dunham-Bush many years ago. I learned a lot working there.
Also remember that until the demise of R12 and R502, compressors were typically dual rated for HT12/LT502. The same is true for R134A and R404A...it's just that they don't publish it anymore.
Dunham-Bush Wow that just show's how old you are.:LOL::LOL::D 0h that reminds Happy Birthday(Early)
icemeister
04-25-2010, 04:19 PM
Dunham-Bush Wow that just show's how old you are.:LOL::LOL::D 0h that reminds Happy Birthday(Early)
Yup, I started with D/B in 1977.
Thanks for the early birthday wishes CT. ;)
surenuff
04-25-2010, 04:36 PM
It is great information. It is like an library of HVACR information on this site. I have really been happy I found this place.
crackertech
04-25-2010, 04:44 PM
It is great information. It is like an library of HVACR information on this site. I have really been happy I found this place.
The EF is also a library that is a work in progress always adding to that great expanse of knowledge.
I to learn something new here every day.
crackertech
04-25-2010, 04:54 PM
Yup, I started with D/B in 1977.
Thanks for the early birthday wishes CT. ;)
Your welcome have a great one.
BTW I need an ETA on the of lighting the candles so that I can step out and look for the glow on the North East coast.:D:D
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0 Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.