LarryNH914
09-30-2009, 11:48 AM
Situation:
1) Damp crawlspace (there is plastic on the floor).
2) Rusty FHA Oil Furnace.
3) Horizontal installation (around 4' of space)
4) 2nd Heat exchanger cracked in 7 years. (I suspect corrosion due to damp environment)
5) Maine (along coast, so unusual to get to -10F, but it does)
6) Around 1500 square ft.
The small independent HVAC guy that replaced the exchanger last time is suggesting that a "pattern" has emerged, and that we should consider using Monitor type heaters instead of the central system we have now.
We would use 2 Monitor type systems. (Actually, I am leaning toward Toyotami systems since you can use #2 oil if we do this)
I can see his point looking at the 10 year old furnace that looks 10 times worse than a
furnace I have in a townhouse in a nice dry basement that is probably 25 years old. For example, we had to replace the chimney pipe because it was almost corroded through.... If you dig a hole in this crawlspace, it fills with water. I think most corrosion occurs in the summer, when the system is not being used.
But.... most Monitor type systems I see are called "supplemental".
There may be a problem with not enough return air (could this cause a heat exchange to overheat??) as well, but this could be fixed.
So, just keeping an open mind right now and asking questions. The Monitor type approach is not typically used as a main heating source, so I am a bit uncomfortable about this.
Are there furnaces designed for this kind of dampness? Is there a reason I should not consider the monitor approach? We don't have a great place to put a system on the first floor.
Thanks,
Larry
1) Damp crawlspace (there is plastic on the floor).
2) Rusty FHA Oil Furnace.
3) Horizontal installation (around 4' of space)
4) 2nd Heat exchanger cracked in 7 years. (I suspect corrosion due to damp environment)
5) Maine (along coast, so unusual to get to -10F, but it does)
6) Around 1500 square ft.
The small independent HVAC guy that replaced the exchanger last time is suggesting that a "pattern" has emerged, and that we should consider using Monitor type heaters instead of the central system we have now.
We would use 2 Monitor type systems. (Actually, I am leaning toward Toyotami systems since you can use #2 oil if we do this)
I can see his point looking at the 10 year old furnace that looks 10 times worse than a
furnace I have in a townhouse in a nice dry basement that is probably 25 years old. For example, we had to replace the chimney pipe because it was almost corroded through.... If you dig a hole in this crawlspace, it fills with water. I think most corrosion occurs in the summer, when the system is not being used.
But.... most Monitor type systems I see are called "supplemental".
There may be a problem with not enough return air (could this cause a heat exchange to overheat??) as well, but this could be fixed.
So, just keeping an open mind right now and asking questions. The Monitor type approach is not typically used as a main heating source, so I am a bit uncomfortable about this.
Are there furnaces designed for this kind of dampness? Is there a reason I should not consider the monitor approach? We don't have a great place to put a system on the first floor.
Thanks,
Larry