The Doctor
12-28-2008, 07:19 AM
Peter Schiff in Wall Street Journal
Posted by Bill Anderson at December 27, 2008 07:54 AM
My, my. Even a broken clock is right twice a day. The Wall Street Journal editorial page does not match that record, but at least today has a piece by the great Peter Schiff. Before further praising the WSJ, let us not forget that this editorial page excoriated a number of Republicans for voting against the "bailout" (or TARP in Newspeak) in September. Anyway, here is some of Schiff's wisdom, and I mean that seriously:
It would be irresponsible in the extreme for an individual to forestall a personal recession by taking out newer, bigger loans when the old loans can't be repaid. However, this is precisely what we are planning on a national level.
I believe these ideas hold sway largely because they promise happy, pain-free solutions. They are the economic equivalent of miracle weight-loss programs that require no dieting or exercise. The theories permit economists to claim mystic wisdom, governments to pretend that they have the power to dispel hardship with the whir of a printing press, and voters to believe that they can have recovery without sacrifice.
As a follower of the Austrian School of economics I believe that market forces apply equally to people and nations. The problems we face collectively are no different from those we face individually. Belt tightening is required by all, including government.
Governments cannot create but merely redirect. When the government spends, the money has to come from somewhere. If the government doesn't have a surplus, then it must come from taxes. If taxes don't go up, then it must come from increased borrowing. If lenders won't lend, then it must come from the printing press, which is where all these bailouts are headed. But each additional dollar printed diminishes the value those already in circulation. Something cannot be effortlessly created from nothing.
The sky is not falling; do not act as if it is or lend your support to those who recognize hard times as the perfect opportunity to realize their grandiose dreams of social engineering, wealth redistribution, and central economic planning.(thanks to Robert Higgs)
Say what you will about free-trade(Austrian economics), but it hasn't been tried. See this article (http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig9/cooper1.html)for details.
But anyway enjoy the mott's here from Peter Schiff. He has some rather frank bits of advice if you dig into his stuff from the last 4 or 5 years--and that was just predicting the jeezny we're in now!
Posted by Bill Anderson at December 27, 2008 07:54 AM
My, my. Even a broken clock is right twice a day. The Wall Street Journal editorial page does not match that record, but at least today has a piece by the great Peter Schiff. Before further praising the WSJ, let us not forget that this editorial page excoriated a number of Republicans for voting against the "bailout" (or TARP in Newspeak) in September. Anyway, here is some of Schiff's wisdom, and I mean that seriously:
It would be irresponsible in the extreme for an individual to forestall a personal recession by taking out newer, bigger loans when the old loans can't be repaid. However, this is precisely what we are planning on a national level.
I believe these ideas hold sway largely because they promise happy, pain-free solutions. They are the economic equivalent of miracle weight-loss programs that require no dieting or exercise. The theories permit economists to claim mystic wisdom, governments to pretend that they have the power to dispel hardship with the whir of a printing press, and voters to believe that they can have recovery without sacrifice.
As a follower of the Austrian School of economics I believe that market forces apply equally to people and nations. The problems we face collectively are no different from those we face individually. Belt tightening is required by all, including government.
Governments cannot create but merely redirect. When the government spends, the money has to come from somewhere. If the government doesn't have a surplus, then it must come from taxes. If taxes don't go up, then it must come from increased borrowing. If lenders won't lend, then it must come from the printing press, which is where all these bailouts are headed. But each additional dollar printed diminishes the value those already in circulation. Something cannot be effortlessly created from nothing.
The sky is not falling; do not act as if it is or lend your support to those who recognize hard times as the perfect opportunity to realize their grandiose dreams of social engineering, wealth redistribution, and central economic planning.(thanks to Robert Higgs)
Say what you will about free-trade(Austrian economics), but it hasn't been tried. See this article (http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig9/cooper1.html)for details.
But anyway enjoy the mott's here from Peter Schiff. He has some rather frank bits of advice if you dig into his stuff from the last 4 or 5 years--and that was just predicting the jeezny we're in now!