View Full Version : Liberals double standard is alive and well
fixacr
09-01-2008, 09:33 PM
I was just watching Larry King and I had to leave the room. James Carville was ridiculing Sarah Palin's "lack of experience".
HOW IN THE NAME OF ALL THAT'S HOLY CAN ANY SUPPOSEDLY INTELLIGENT PERSON SUPPORT BARAK OBAMA AND HAVE THE PURE UNMITTIGATED GALL TO QUESTION SOMEONES POLITICAL EXPERIENCE?
Sorry about that- if I don't scream, I might shoot somebody.
bootlen
09-01-2008, 09:40 PM
James Carville. James Carville. Isn't he the guy who tried to take that ring from Frodo Baggins?
mrs reb77
09-01-2008, 09:41 PM
:D It's ok! Just don't watch stuff like that!
Carville has always reminded me of a mole...or a shrew...or something else that I can't mention here. Must be the bald head and the squinty eyes.
mrs reb77
09-01-2008, 09:42 PM
James Carville. James Carville. Isn't he the guy who tried to take that ring from Frodo Baggins?
Oh yeah, and he reminds me of Golum too!
acmanko
09-01-2008, 09:50 PM
damn good analogy
whec720
09-01-2008, 09:51 PM
He always reminded me of this guy.
http://files2.fluxstatic.com/001CF02500E136C00007AFEBFFFF/Jpg/B-5201/AR560x560,Resize/633464484600000000
k-fridge
09-01-2008, 09:54 PM
Pretty bad when your wife calls you serpent head.
razorwit
09-01-2008, 09:56 PM
James Carville. James Carville. Isn't he the guy who tried to take that ring from Frodo Baggins?
LMAO!
The Preeeeshusssss:D:D
mrs reb77
09-01-2008, 09:58 PM
Pretty bad when your wife calls you serpent head.
Ok, that's where I was headed but forgot the analogy!
ga-hvac-tech
09-01-2008, 10:18 PM
I was just watching Larry King and I had to leave the room. James Carville was ridiculing Sarah Palin's "lack of experience".
HOW IN THE NAME OF ALL THAT'S HOLY CAN ANY SUPPOSEDLY INTELLIGENT PERSON SUPPORT BARAK OBAMA AND HAVE THE PURE UNMITTIGATED GALL TO QUESTION SOMEONES POLITICAL EXPERIENCE?
Sorry about that- if I don't scream, I might shoot somebody.
When folks are drunk on power, they will do ANYTHING to get and keep it (the power). THIS is the reason one should never trust a (professional) politician...
There are politicians that do it for a higher cause (a higher cause than promoting their power base). Problem is there are not many of them... and the funny thing is that the few that will put themselves in the line of fire like that... they will make a difference if we will support them.
There have been a few threads with a post or two suggesting the voters get what they deserve. It appears this time around (this election cycle) we can elect a no-nonsense person that will put up a real effort to clean house (I refer to congress there)...
Now when this person gets into office, we need to get involved and support this 'change' for the better! If we just sit on our duffs, it will not be long until the liberals LIE and CHEAT their way back into office, and it is business as usual... that being the voters get a raw deal (again), while the politicians get rich off us... :rolleyes:
Andy Schoen
09-01-2008, 10:25 PM
I had the occasion to attend a speech by both James and Mary Carville at a few years ago.
I found both gave well reasoned speeches, including their explanations as how they can manage to stay married. :D
I suspect James Carville considers the nomination of Sarah Palin as a masterstroke on McCain's part. Carville can only argue from a limited hand at the moment. ;)
sline-dawg
09-01-2008, 10:27 PM
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080829/ap_on_el_pr/cvn_veepstakes_analysis
She is younger and less experienced than the first-term Illinois senator, and brings an ethical shadow to the ticket. A governor for just 20 months, she was two-term mayor of Wasilla, Alaska, a town of 6,500 where the biggest issue is controlling growth and the biggest civic worry is whether there will be enough snow for the Iditarod dog-mushing race.
I didn't write it....:p
RoBoTeq
09-01-2008, 10:35 PM
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080829/ap_on_el_pr/cvn_veepstakes_analysis
She is younger and less experienced than the first-term Illinois senator, and brings an ethical shadow to the ticket. A governor for just 20 months, she was two-term mayor of Wasilla, Alaska, a town of 6,500 where the biggest issue is controlling growth and the biggest civic worry is whether there will be enough snow for the Iditarod dog-mushing race.
I didn't write it....:p
Just how is Sarah Palin less experienced in government positions then Barack Hussein Obama is?
glennac
09-01-2008, 10:42 PM
Just how is Sarah Palin less experienced in government positions then Barack Hussein Obama is?
Perhaps running the mouth for 143 days in the Senate without accomplishing anything other than racking up the most "liberal" voting record in Congress counts for something in some circles like maybe Red Square. He did have 20 years of "political education" in a hate America church which also should count for something.
bootlen
09-01-2008, 10:46 PM
BO has NO executive experience. SP has executive experience in 2 elected positions.
2cool4us
09-01-2008, 10:55 PM
I was just watching Larry King and I had to leave the room. James Carville was ridiculing Sarah Palin's "lack of experience".
HOW IN THE NAME OF ALL THAT'S HOLY CAN ANY SUPPOSEDLY INTELLIGENT PERSON SUPPORT BARAK OBAMA AND HAVE THE PURE UNMITTIGATED GALL TO QUESTION SOMEONES POLITICAL EXPERIENCE?
Sorry about that- if I don't scream, I might shoot somebody.With have 3 Senators and 1 Governor running for the top spot. Only one has overseen the budget of a geographical and political entity. That being SP. This root base experience is a must for the economic viability of our nation. SP or someone like her should be numero uno on both tickets.:cool:
acmanko
09-01-2008, 11:22 PM
With have 3 Senators and 1 Governor running for the top spot. Only one has overseen the budget of a geographical and political entity. That being SP. This root base experience is a must for the economic viability of our nation. SP or someone like her should be numero uno on both tickets.:cool:
G W Bush was defacto Governor of Texas, which he practically sent to the poor house, just as he's done the Country as a whole. Politicians should not be able to apply for the job
2cool4us
09-01-2008, 11:31 PM
G W Bush was defacto Governor of Texas, which he practically sent to the poor house, just as he's done the Country as a whole. Politicians should not be able to apply for the jobCheck apples to apples. Apparently we as nation did not closely scrutinize GW's stewardship of Texas coffers. Alaska on the other hand seems to be quite solvent. :rolleyes:
mrs reb77
09-01-2008, 11:34 PM
If I remember correctly, Arkansas wasn't much better off after their governor/president left?
acmanko
09-01-2008, 11:34 PM
Check apples to apples. Apparently we as nation did not closely scrutinize GW's stewardship of Texas coffers. Alaska on the other hand seems to be quite solvent. :rolleyes:she had nothing to do with alaskas oil riches, which it shares with its populace, while Texas takes its oil riches and spends it foolishly
2cool4us
09-01-2008, 11:38 PM
she had nothing to do with alaskas oil riches, which it shares with its populace, while Texas takes its oil riches and spends it foolishlyWell, she might not have produced them, but she is at the helm making a great deal of determination on how the revenue produced by them are used.:cool:
mrs reb77
09-01-2008, 11:38 PM
she had nothing to do with alaskas oil riches, which it shares with its populace, while Texas takes its oil riches and spends it foolishly
Maybe you better research that just a little bit better.
Check out how maybe the TAXES on the BIG OIL companies have changed since Mrs. Palin took office and why.
Also, maybe look into how contracts have been awarded for a large pipeline job. I assure you it's interesting reading. And much more truthful than what you just posted.
mrs reb77
09-01-2008, 11:39 PM
Well, she might not have produced them, but she is at the helm making a great deal of determination on how the revenue produced by them are used.:cool:
Oops, wasn't referencing this post, the one before it.
2cool4us
09-01-2008, 11:40 PM
Oops, wasn't referencing this post, the one before it.
:D:eek::D
mrs reb77
09-01-2008, 11:43 PM
There! I put the quote in so nobody gets confused....!
2cool4us
09-01-2008, 11:50 PM
She's also pro gun. After economics experience, this would be my second reason for voting for her. :cool:
The Doctor
09-02-2008, 06:23 AM
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080829/ap_on_el_pr/cvn_veepstakes_analysis
She is younger and less experienced than the first-term Illinois senator, and brings an ethical shadow to the ticket. A governor for just 20 months, she was two-term mayor of Wasilla, Alaska, a town of 6,500 where the biggest issue is controlling growth and the biggest civic worry is whether there will be enough snow for the Iditarod dog-mushing race.
I didn't write it....:p
The writers of this play on presuppositions about "conservatives" because by and large they are in the tank for the Democratic machine. If they could say that her nomination proves that 'Pubs hate women, you can take it to the bank that it would be in headlines with pictures of Karl Rove with horns and a pitchfork ad his tail swishing like an angry cat. His tail would be making the ocean waves in New Orleans larger and ....
Alright, alright enough of that already :D
IDK Sline-Dawg, for as many times already as we hear of this "ethical" shadow or what-have-you, do you really think that we can recognize that her daughter has made a "young adult" decision and will live with the results regardless of the State of the Union?
What's this got to do with the ethics inside the Beltway?
It's so tempting to hit BOLD and FONT SIZE while answering this, but I'll see if you can answer it first.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0 Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.