nchvac
08-11-2008, 08:18 PM
Can someone tell me why ICM can't seem to draw a logical schematic like everyone else? I guess they are showing their stuff in a solid state way.
I found a time delay on a carrier package unit today that had the 24 volts coming in on the #1 leg instead of the #3 leg. The board shows the power coming in at 3 as the input and leaving terminal 1 to go to the #2 terminal on the Phase board. I think that if they used a little better logic and normal schematics, as well as stayed consistent, then the techs would find these delays more user friendly. The carrier schematic shows the power coming in on 1 and leaving on 3, but I don't know if this is an original time delay.
This leads to my next question. The only thing that I could think of that this board would do is to keep Comp 1 and 2 from starting up at the same time. Is this correct?
Another question. Are these boards "power robing" for the common, or does the circuitry sense the voltage potential and then pass it through after the set time?
I found a time delay on a carrier package unit today that had the 24 volts coming in on the #1 leg instead of the #3 leg. The board shows the power coming in at 3 as the input and leaving terminal 1 to go to the #2 terminal on the Phase board. I think that if they used a little better logic and normal schematics, as well as stayed consistent, then the techs would find these delays more user friendly. The carrier schematic shows the power coming in on 1 and leaving on 3, but I don't know if this is an original time delay.
This leads to my next question. The only thing that I could think of that this board would do is to keep Comp 1 and 2 from starting up at the same time. Is this correct?
Another question. Are these boards "power robing" for the common, or does the circuitry sense the voltage potential and then pass it through after the set time?