Muslims are calling for the death of all who oppose them in England

[glennac]

This came from my cousin in Tennessee. All you liberals beware of what's coming around the corner with unchecke immirgration.


These Pictures tell it all!

Muslims have stated that England will be the first country they take over!

These are pictures not shown on American TV or in American Newspapers (as they might help Bush's war on terror), but were forwarded to me by a Canadian Friend who thought Americans ought to know!

These pictures are of Muslims marching through the streets of London during their recent "Religion of Peace Demonstration."

http://us.f555.mail.yahoo.com/ya/download?mid=1_514278_ANo6vs4AAROmRde8ZwAup3Jrn7g&pid=2&fid=Inbox&inline=1

http://us.f555.mail.yahoo.com/ya/download?mid=1_514278_ANo6vs4AAROmRde8ZwAup3Jrn7g&pid=3&fid=Inbox&inline=1

http://us.f555.mail.yahoo.com/ya/download?mid=1_514278_ANo6vs4AAROmRde8ZwAup3Jrn7g&pid=4&fid=Inbox&inline=1


http://us.f555.mail.yahoo.com/ya/download?mid=1_514278_ANo6vs4AAROmRde8ZwAup3Jrn7g&pid=5&fid=Inbox&inline=1

http://us.f555.mail.yahoo.com/ya/download?mid=1_514278_ANo6vs4AAROmRde8ZwAup3Jrn7g&pid=6&fid=Inbox&inline=1

http://us.f555.mail.yahoo.com/ya/download?mid=1_514278_ANo6vs4AAROmRde8ZwAup3Jrn7g&pid=7&fid=Inbox&inline=1

http://us.f555.mail.yahoo.com/ya/download?mid=1_514278_ANo6vs4AAROmRde8ZwAup3Jrn7g&pid=8&fid=Inbox&inline=1

http://us.f555.mail.yahoo.com/ya/download?mid=1_514278_ANo6vs4AAROmRde8ZwAup3Jrn7g&pid=9&fid=Inbox&inline=1

http://us.f555.mail.yahoo.com/ya/download?mid=1_514278_ANo6vs4AAROmRde8ZwAup3Jrn7g&pid=10&fid=Inbox&inline=1

Why would anyone think

that we should be at war

with such nice, peaceful Muslims?!



Americans need to Know - You need to forward this one to everyone in your address book

[coordinatesales]

Links not working.

[jrbenny]

You need to move those pictures to a public hosting service or upload them to the forum.

[corny]

The preceding photographs, taken at a Muslim protest rally outside the Danish embassy in London on February 3, 2006, are authentic, but contrary to what is suggested in the text the event was not billed as a "Religion of Peace demonstration." It was an angry protest over the publication of cartoons regarded as insulting to the Prophet Muhammad.

The event was one of many similar held worldwide during the weeks following the initial publication of the cartoons in a Danish newspaper and their subsequent replication by other sources. As many as 700 marchers participated in the February 3 rally, some chanting slogans and waving placards such as those shown in the photos threatening violence toward "those who insult Islam."

The threats were condemned not only by British authorities and members of the general public but by some Islamic leaders as well. In a statement to the BBC News Web site, Asghar Bukhari, chairman of the Muslim Public Affairs Committee in London, decried the inflammatory statements as "disgraceful and disgusting" and not representative of the feelings of typical Muslims.

Odd how they felt the lie about a "religion of peace demonstration" would give more credit to the photos...which are real....

Gonna be like that here one day... dim or pug government...we are always going to allow these folks to immigrate here and once here we are always going to let them organize events like this.....till its too late

google "religion of peace demonstration" those photos should be all over the net....

[Sam-the-man]

[/COLOR][/FONT]Americans need to Know - You need to forward this one to everyone in your address book

if you foreward this to at least seven people you will find your true love in one week

[tinknocker44]

Muslims are calling for the death of all who oppose them


So are the Neocons.

[gtt]

What IS a NEOCON, anyway?

[tinknocker44]

What IS a NEOCON, anyway?


Neo-conservatives

[the mojo]

Thanks, Corny and for the link on page 3 photos Nostradamas.;)

[oloenneker]

What IS a NEOCON, anyway?

Ahhh.. the age old "what is a Neo-Con" question pop up onve again...

Perhaps a link will help you understand...

http://www.newamericancentury.org/



June 3, 1997

American foreign and defense policy is adrift. Conservatives have criticized the incoherent policies of the Clinton Administration. They have also resisted isolationist impulses from within their own ranks. But conservatives have not confidently advanced a strategic vision of America's role in the world. They have not set forth guiding principles for American foreign policy. They have allowed differences over tactics to obscure potential agreement on strategic objectives. And they have not fought for a defense budget that would maintain American security and advance American interests in the new century.

We aim to change this. We aim to make the case and rally support for American global leadership.

As the 20th century draws to a close, the United States stands as the world's preeminent power. Having led the West to victory in the Cold War, America faces an opportunity and a challenge: Does the United States have the vision to build upon the achievements of past decades? Does the United States have the resolve to shape a new century favorable to American principles and interests?

We are in danger of squandering the opportunity and failing the challenge. We are living off the capital -- both the military investments and the foreign policy achievements -- built up by past administrations. Cuts in foreign affairs and defense spending, inattention to the tools of statecraft, and inconstant leadership are making it increasingly difficult to sustain American influence around the world. And the promise of short-term commercial benefits threatens to override strategic considerations. As a consequence, we are jeopardizing the nation's ability to meet present threats and to deal with potentially greater challenges that lie ahead.

We seem to have forgotten the essential elements of the Reagan Administration's success: a military that is strong and ready to meet both present and future challenges; a foreign policy that boldly and purposefully promotes American principles abroad; and national leadership that accepts the United States' global responsibilities.

Of course, the United States must be prudent in how it exercises its power. But we cannot safely avoid the responsibilities of global leadership or the costs that are associated with its exercise. America has a vital role in maintaining peace and security in Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. If we shirk our responsibilities, we invite challenges to our fundamental interests. The history of the 20th century should have taught us that it is important to shape circumstances before crises emerge, and to meet threats before they become dire. The history of this century should have taught us to embrace the cause of American leadership.

Our aim is to remind Americans of these lessons and to draw their consequences for today. Here are four consequences:

• we need to increase defense spending significantly if we are to carry out our global
responsibilities today and modernize our armed forces for the future;

• we need to strengthen our ties to democratic allies and to challenge regimes hostile to our interests and values;

• we need to promote the cause of political and economic freedom abroad;

• we need to accept responsibility for America's unique role in preserving and extending an international order friendly to our security, our prosperity, and our principles.

Such a Reaganite policy of military strength and moral clarity may not be fashionable today. But it is necessary if the United States is to build on the successes of this past century and to ensure our security and our greatness in the next.

Elliott Abrams Gary Bauer William J. Bennett Jeb Bush

Dick Cheney Eliot A. Cohen Midge Decter Paula Dobriansky Steve Forbes

Aaron Friedberg Francis Fukuyama Frank Gaffney Fred C. Ikle

Donald Kagan Zalmay Khalilzad I. Lewis Libby Norman Podhoretz

Dan Quayle Peter W. Rodman Stephen P. Rosen Henry S. Rowen

Donald Rumsfeld Vin Weber George Weigel Paul Wolfowitz



These people are very dangerous... Just look at their first strike in their plan: Iraq.... The future looks very dismal, dismal indeed if we allow these people to execute their plans.

This has been attempted before in history... This was the result.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/2f/Flag_of_Germany_1933.svg/600px-Flag_of_Germany_1933.svg.png

[glennac]

Ahhh.. the age old "what is a Neo-Con" question pop up onve again...

Perhaps a link will help you understand...

http://www.newamericancentury.org/



These people are very dangerous... Just look at their first strike in their plan: Iraq.... The future looks very dismal, dismal indeed if we allow these people to execute their plans.

This has been attempted before in history... This was the result.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/2f/Flag_of_Germany_1933.svg/600px-Flag_of_Germany_1933.svg.png


Ole, I don't see the connection at all. Hitler was trying to expaned the borders of Germany. Granted we got into something which we should have stayed out of but it was not done to help the America economy. Isreal in the short term may be the only benfituary which I myself disagree with. Now that we are there we can't pull out unless we surrender the planet to the radical Muslims. There are no easy solutions. I think we should have stayed out of the rest of the world business starting with WW1. We would probably never had to deal with Communism or WW11. But that is another story.

[The Doctor]

What IS a NEOCON, anyway?

foreign policy gun nuts. a current drawback for them is micromanagement of the war on the u.s. domestic front, causing ineffective gun nuttiness. nonetheless, as the Pres. put it so succinctly, money trumps safety. :eek: :mad: :( what more can I say?
editor's note, he may not be a NEO, but neither is he a conservative --only exhibits characteristics of either at any given moment.

[glennac]

You need to move those pictures to a public hosting service or upload them to the forum.

Thanks for the advice. I don't know how to do either but I'll try and figure it out next time before I try this in the future. Here is one link.:)

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&q=religion+of+peace+demonstration&btnG=Search