stay out of my bedroom???

[The Doctor]

the latest vaccination to be debated in at least 20 state legislatures currently is the HPV vac called gardasil. Now I have a question for you...
if what people do in their bedrooms is their private affair, why would we suggest that we make (one of ) the results (HPV) a public policy?
HPV is transmitted sexually, no? WHat we do in our bedrooms is our private business, no?
Does it follow then, that we should lobby our legislators and either
A) say yes to this vaccination, or
B) say no to this vaccination.
I mean, if I want to raise little boy hos and little girl hos, what business is that of yours, if what they do in the bedroom is a private matter?

I'm sure that the big pharma co that owns the vac is lobbying hard for one result, aren't you??

[braces4impact]

Yes , this does appear ostensibly to be a contradiction. But then again, it would be a contradiction for liberals who would try to hold both premises simultaneously. This is just reason number 4567 why Libertarianism is the only party that makes sense. I would oppose government funding for such a thing while holding that what consenting people do behind closed doors is there business. See, no contradiction.

But of coarse ChillBill can't agree with you here The Doctor because he says the law of non contradiction is invalid.

[The Doctor]

righto on no contradiction, braces.
Merck is behind the push, along with some members of Women in Gov't, according to this article:
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=54307