PDA

View Full Version : Understanding how slick willie and wife operate.



chillbilly
08-25-2006, 06:36 PM
http://www.nydailynews.com/08-20-2006/news/col/story/444911p-374680c.html


Vintage Bill Clinton. Speculating on foreign affairs he didn't understand then and doesn't understand now.

seatonheating
08-25-2006, 07:34 PM
Ya..that's not biased or anything. Calling him Bubba every other sentence? Another Right wing nut article.

classical
08-25-2006, 07:53 PM
Originally posted by seatonheating
Ya..that's not biased or anything. Calling him Bubba every other sentence? Another Right wing nut article.

Little overstated since there were more than four sentances and only two Bubba's.

The gist of the article is dead on!

RoBoTeq
08-25-2006, 08:11 PM
It is not a good idea to use derogatory names for persons, especially those who have been president of the United States. By calling President Clinton, Bubba, the columnist gives ammunition to those who oppose President Bush to make claims that the columnists viewpoints are biased.

Oh....someone already did that, didn't they?

chillbilly
08-25-2006, 08:37 PM
Somehow, I don't think this columnists gives a rat's a$$ whether he's perceived as biased or not.
Objectivity is rare in these columns these days anyway, so what's the big deal?

I don't see any repubs crying (like the libs do)about "bias" when they smear President Bush without substantive fact.
Nah, we just tell them they don't have a clue. LOL

Someone probably asked the poor guy to recount instances of slick willie's past whereby he could justify giving slick willie a little respect by calling him 'President Clinton'.






Thus, we have the columnist referring to slick willie as bubba.

seatonheating
08-25-2006, 09:11 PM
If anyone could be considered "Bubba" it would be our current president.

chillbilly
08-25-2006, 10:48 PM
Shows how little you know.
The bubba reference was based on it being slick-willie's nickname from his earlier political days.

rob10
08-25-2006, 10:57 PM
Iraq is a seperate issue from Islamic terrorism. Too many of our resources are tied up in Iraq therefore diminishing our capacity to go after global terrorism.





BTW: Can't wait till the Hillary for Prez tee shirts come out. I will personally model one in a pic I will post!! :D :D

chillbilly
08-25-2006, 11:07 PM
A separate issue?
That's one of the problems slick-willie encountered throughout his presidency....his capacity to deal with and understand global issues involving warring countries and factions were about as adequate as yours, Rob.


It's one war, stupid.





BTW: Can't wait till the Hillary for Prez tee shirts come out. I will personally model one in a pic I will post!!
__________________________________________________ ________
Can we get a shot of you wearing her shirt while she's hittin' you in the azz?

rob10
08-25-2006, 11:14 PM
He understands that we are in IRAQ first and foremost to protect the oil interests of GW, CHENEY, and all the CEOs of big oil. Hillary will tear some A## off the BUSHBOTS come election time just on this one point!!

seatonheating
08-25-2006, 11:17 PM
Originally posted by rob10
He understands that we are in IRAQ first and foremost to protect the oil interests of GW, CHENEY, and all the CEOs of big oil. Hillary will tear some A## off the BUSHBOTS come election time just on this one point!!


Yep, the truth will come out one way or another. And it isn't pretty!!

chillbilly
08-25-2006, 11:22 PM
It's one war, stupid.

sline-dawg
08-26-2006, 07:01 PM
And what war is that....Einstein????

chillbilly
08-26-2006, 07:29 PM
Read the article in the link produced by the OP and you will have your answer.

Next time, you might want to read the thread so you don't have to ask a question where an answer has already been provided.
It only takes a minute or two for the people who are not reading comprehension challenged.

rob10
08-26-2006, 08:20 PM
The rest of the BUSHBOTS have bought in to the idea of giving up everything including our personal freedoms to keep a few ragheads in the desert!! Lets face the truth. Terroist have already beat our collective a## when we lose our CONSTITUTIONAL FREEDOMS!!

oloenneker
08-26-2006, 08:58 PM
Terroist have already beat our collective a## when we lose our CONSTITUTIONAL FREEDOMS!!



And that is exactly what they want. If Bush keeps it up, they just might have their wish come true. Or maybe it's a conspiracy?

chillbilly
08-26-2006, 09:58 PM
It's one war, stupid.

Some of those people you refer to as "ragheads" are intent on destroying you and your country while you ***** and moan about this country's efforts to preserve, protect and defend this country through surveillance and offensive war strategy.

When the buildings are falling down around you, you cry about the admin not doing enough.
When the admin tries to do enough you cry about their efforts.

Those crocodile tears will fall from your whiny little liberal eyes regardless of what is done.

rob10
08-26-2006, 10:01 PM
I.E. Hillary Clinton.


There will be no need for strong arm GESTAPO tactics against our own citizens. GW and Company are weak and damned STUPID!!

chillbilly
08-26-2006, 10:06 PM
that dumb ***** won't even win her party's nomination.

rob10
08-26-2006, 10:10 PM
You will be surprised!!

chillbilly
08-26-2006, 10:15 PM
We shall see....in the meantime....



Since you and hilly are so tight, be sure that she knows............................................. .....







It's one war, stupid.

rob10
08-26-2006, 10:52 PM
It's one STUPID war!!

chillbilly
08-27-2006, 08:09 PM
[QUOTE]Originally posted by rob10
It's one STUPID war!!

__________________________________________________ ______
hmmmm. one has to wonder why she supported it and still wants to keep troops there.

RoBoTeq
08-27-2006, 08:25 PM
Hillary again, eh?

http://www.michaelhodges.com/missing.html

rob10
08-27-2006, 09:19 PM
Robo :D :D :D

mtnwrench
08-27-2006, 10:17 PM
how long have you been having this nocturnal emission about Hillary Rob?

bb
08-27-2006, 10:32 PM
Originally posted by rob10
The rest of the BUSHBOTS have bought in to the idea of giving up everything including our personal freedoms to keep a few ragheads in the desert!! Lets face the truth. Terroist have already beat our collective a## when we lose our CONSTITUTIONAL FREEDOMS!!

How Do You Think We Won WWII Numbnuts!!! Differant War=Differant Times=Differant Tactics

http://history.acusd.edu/gen/WW2Timeline/magic.html

rob10
08-27-2006, 10:33 PM
For A LONGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG TIMEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE !!!! :eek:

rob10
08-27-2006, 10:34 PM
Originally posted by bb

Originally posted by rob10
The rest of the BUSHBOTS have bought in to the idea of giving up everything including our personal freedoms to keep a few ragheads in the desert!! Lets face the truth. Terroist have already beat our collective a## when we lose our CONSTITUTIONAL FREEDOMS!!

How Do You Think We Won WWII Numbnuts!!! Differant War=Differant Times=Differant Tactics

http://history.acusd.edu/gen/WW2Timeline/magic.html For one!! We NUKED THEM TO HELL!! Just like we should do now Mr. Weirdo!!

bb
08-27-2006, 10:37 PM
Originally posted by rob10

Originally posted by bb

Originally posted by rob10
The rest of the BUSHBOTS have bought in to the idea of giving up everything including our personal freedoms to keep a few ragheads in the desert!! Lets face the truth. Terroist have already beat our collective a## when we lose our CONSTITUTIONAL FREEDOMS!!

How Do You Think We Won WWII Numbnuts!!! Differant War=Differant Times=Differant Tactics

http://history.acusd.edu/gen/WW2Timeline/magic.html For one!! We NUKED THEM TO HELL!! Just like we should do now Mr. Weirdo!!

We would have lost without the code breakers.

Watched a program last night about how close Japan was to nukes. They tested 6 days after Nagasaki.

bb
08-27-2006, 10:39 PM
Originally posted by rob10
Just like we should do now Mr. Weirdo!!

OK son. Stop using your father's screename and go play on your skateboard. Run Along Now. Run Along.

johnl45
08-28-2006, 08:44 PM
Originally posted by chillbilly

I don't see any repubs crying (like the libs do)about "bias" when they smear President Bush without substantive fact.
The truth is hard to dispute for everyone except the repubs.

skrewt
08-29-2006, 12:10 PM
Originally posted by johnl45

Originally posted by chillbilly

I don't see any repubs crying (like the libs do)about "bias" when they smear President Bush without substantive fact.
The truth is hard to dispute for everyone except the repubs.

The dems don't dispute the truth.
In order to dispute it, you have to be able to recognize it.
A talent well beyond the skills of registered democrats.

rob10
08-30-2006, 05:29 AM
Try to destroy thhe truth. Like the CONSTITUTION!!

evildberg
08-30-2006, 04:14 PM
Rob,

Like the constitution's 2nd amendment rights Mr. Bill Clinton tried to take away from the American people?

In case you don't know what the amendment is reguarding its gun rights.

http://www.judicialwatch.org/5813.shtml

Not to mention his so called assault rifle ban

Wonder where your hero Hillary stands on the issue?

[Edited by evildberg on 08-30-2006 at 04:33 PM]

geerair
08-30-2006, 05:10 PM
Wow.....hot stuff.

Code of conduct?

Making guns safer?


Gives me chills.