PDA

View Full Version : Cowboys vs. Saints



daytonafan
08-22-2006, 07:26 PM
http://www.chieftain.com/sports/1156248001/9

To Geer, Rob, Ole, and crowd. I would like to hear why it is Bush's fault that the Cowboys roasted the Saints last night. He controls the weather, he must control the NFL.

P.S. Did anyone see Suzie Kolber (my next wife) embarrass Blanco during the game last night?

bootlen
08-22-2006, 07:39 PM
Originally posted by daytonafan
http://www.chieftain.com/sports/1156248001/9



P.S. Did anyone see Suzie Kolber (my next wife) embarrass Blanco during the game last night?

Yeah, that was rich. When you marry her, tell 'er, "Good job with Blanco."

geerair
08-22-2006, 08:01 PM
Originally posted by daytonafan
[B]http://www.chieftain.com/sports/1156248001/9

To Geer, Rob, Ole, and crowd. I would like to hear why it is Bush's fault that the Cowboys roasted the Saints last night. He controls the weather, he must control the NFL.He was on vacation jus like the last time he allowed the destruction of N.O.

daytonafan
08-22-2006, 08:12 PM
Originally posted by geerair

Originally posted by daytonafan
[B]http://www.chieftain.com/sports/1156248001/9

To Geer, Rob, Ole, and crowd. I would like to hear why it is Bush's fault that the Cowboys roasted the Saints last night. He controls the weather, he must control the NFL.He was on vacation jus like the last time he allowed the destruction of N.O.



Yep, his cell phone was turned off and noone could reach him. He basically said "screw them po' foke in norlans'.

The President of the United States was too busy trying to park his R.V. to notice anything.

Keep it up Geer, I need to laugh more.

geerair
08-22-2006, 08:23 PM
Originally posted by daytonafan

Yep, his cell phone was turned off and noone could reach him. He basically said "screw them po' foke in norlans'.

The President of the United States was too busy trying to park his R.V. to notice anything.

Keep it up Geer, I need to laugh more.Well, there is a precedent for this kind of thing. He was on vacation also when he blew off a critical PDB that led to the destruction of the twin towers and 3,000 citizens.

bootlen
08-22-2006, 08:27 PM
O-o-o-h-h G-e-e-e-e-e-r-r...BOO!

geerair
08-22-2006, 08:32 PM
Not only that but he has set the record for Presidential sloth and still has 2 more years to add to his already untouchable record.

Be afraid, be very afraid when Bush goes on vacation.

bootlen
08-22-2006, 09:00 PM
Originally posted by geerair
Not only that but he has set the record for Presidential sloth and still has 2 more years to add to his already untouchable record.

Be afraid, be very afraid when Bush goes on vacation.

You are so confused!! First he's dangerous when in the Oval Office...then he's dangerous on vacation!

chillbilly
08-22-2006, 09:46 PM
[QUOTE]Originally posted by geerair

Be afraid, be very afraid when Bush goes on vacation.

__________________________________________________ ________

For someone who claims to believe in the "reality" of scientific "evidence", you sure seem a bit superstitious about vacations, there geer.

BTW,
When does your "vacation" end?

geerair
08-22-2006, 10:43 PM
Originally posted by bootlen

You are so confused!! First he's dangerous when in the Oval Office...then he's dangerous on vacation! Shrub is a two way threat.

geerair
08-22-2006, 10:46 PM
Originally posted by chillbilly

For someone who claims to believe in the "reality" of scientific "evidence", you sure seem a bit superstitious about vacations, there geer.It is not superstitious when there is a documented record.







When does your "vacation" end?Well let's see, we will be flying out of Kona on 10/31. So I suppose you could call that the end........ for a little while anyway.

chillbilly
08-22-2006, 10:50 PM
Have a safe trip. Don't ***** too loudly about your rights when they pat you down at the airport.
Hopefully, your plane won't explode or fly into a tower.
According to documented record, you should be OK until about midway, 2008.

geerair
08-22-2006, 11:28 PM
Originally posted by chillbilly
Have a safe trip. Don't ***** too loudly about your rights when they pat you down at the airport.Okey dokey.






Hopefully, your plane won't explode or fly into a tower.If it does, C'est la vie.





According to documented record, you should be OK until about midway, 2008.Hmmmm......according to documented records we haven't been safe since 2001.

chillbilly
08-22-2006, 11:32 PM
Hmmmm......according to documented records we haven't been safe since 2001.

__________________________________________________ ________

I see.....not preventing you from flying though....is it?

A good rule of thumb would likely be to avoid ANY flights if we ever elect a democrat into the White House.
LOL....just kiddin'.......NOT

geerair
08-22-2006, 11:40 PM
Originally posted by chillbilly

I see.....not preventing you from flying though....is it?Nope. As a matter of fact we flew to Maui just a month after 9/11.


Six hours into an eight hour flight, blowing me up would have been a tender mercy.



A good rule of thumb would likely be to avoid ANY flights if we ever elect a democrat into the White House.
LOL....just kiddin'.......NOT Well, that rule of thumb didn't help the 9/11 people any.

chillbilly
08-22-2006, 11:49 PM
Well, that rule of thumb didn't help the 9/11 people any.
__________________________________________________ ________

That's true. And the pre-intel was as abysmal in the initial stages of Bush's presidency as it was during Clinton's presidency.

It's fairly reasonable to assume that 9/11 was planned, for the most part during the Clinton watch and executed under the Bush watch.

There's enough blame to go around.
Addressing the problem of how to deal with structured terrorist plots is going to have to be an ongoing policy because it's not going away.

geerair
08-23-2006, 12:15 AM
Originally posted by chillbilly

That's true. And the pre-intel was as abysmal in the initial stages of Bush's presidency as it was during Clinton's presidency.The PDB Bush blew off was quite clear. "OBL intends to attack the U.S." Pretty damn accurate intel it would seem.





It's fairly reasonable to assume that 9/11 was planned, for the most part during the Clinton watch and executed under the Bush watch.That would be a reasonable statement.






Addressing the problem of how to deal with structured terrorist plots is going to have to be an ongoing policy because it's not going away. I agree.

chillbilly
08-23-2006, 12:20 AM
The PDB Bush blew off was quite clear. "OBL intends to attack the U.S." Pretty damn accurate intel it would seem.
__________________________________________________ ________
That intel was present for years under the previous admin.
What did they do with the intel?

WTC attacked. Clinton was as lucky as hell that Al Queda didn't plan particularly effective attacks while he was in office.


Why weren't precautions taken if the intel was there under Clinton/ Gore?

renaissanse man
08-23-2006, 12:25 AM
Bush is real. Clinton, Kerry, Kennedy, all a buncha phonies.Bush stands for most of what I believe in. Better than any demolition derby democrap!

geerair
08-23-2006, 12:25 AM
Originally posted by chillbilly
That intel was present for years under the previous admin.
What did they do with the intel?You just got through saying the intel was dismal.






WTC attacked. Clinton was as lucky as hell that Al Queda didn't plan particularly effective attacks while he was in office.Was it luck?



Why weren't precautions taken if the intel was there under Clinton/ Gore? You just got through saying the intel was dismal.

chillbilly
08-23-2006, 12:41 AM
You just got through saying the intel was dismal.
__________________________________________________ _______
Yes, I know. And you are asserting it was there and solid.
So, again, if it was credible, what action was taken pre-Bush?

geerair
08-23-2006, 12:47 AM
Originally posted by chillbilly
Yes, I know. And you are asserting it was there and solid.
So, again, if it was credible, what action was taken pre-Bush?The PBD was presented in 2001, not 1999.

seatonheating
08-23-2006, 12:48 AM
Originally posted by chillbilly
You just got through saying the intel was dismal.
__________________________________________________ _______
Yes, I know. And you are asserting it was there and solid.
So, again, if it was credible, what action was taken pre-Bush?


There's a myriad of evidence that supports the fact that intel, good or bad, wouldn't have stopped 9/11. Can anyone say inside job?

chillbilly
08-23-2006, 12:58 AM
The PBD was presented in 2001, not 1999
__________________________________________________ _______
Yes. Well what intel was present during the 1990's??
None?

I guess what I'm getting at is that there was some inherent inability to act appropriately based on the intel.
Was it reliable? What was the substance of the intel, during Bush and pre-Bush?


I haven't heard anything from you that would attribute any missteps to the Clinton admin and that is unfortunate.
It shows the same blind allegiance to a leader when you so readily accuse Bush supporters of the same things.

geerair
08-23-2006, 01:03 AM
Originally posted by chillbilly



I haven't heard anything from you that would attribute any missteps to the Clinton admin and that is unfortunate.
It shows the same blind allegiance to a leader when you so readily accuse Bush supporters of the same things. I agreed with you there was enough blame to go around. What do you want?

chillbilly
08-23-2006, 01:08 AM
I agreed with you there was enough blame to go around. What do you want?
__________________________________________________ _________

Yes, I guess you did. I was hoping to see you actually acknowledge, with details, the faults of an administration other than GWB.

Silly me, what was I thinking?

geerair
08-23-2006, 01:37 AM
Originally posted by chillbilly

Yes, I guess you did. I was hoping to see you actually acknowledge, with details, the faults of an administration other than GWB.

Silly me, what was I thinking?You were too shocked to think.

daytonafan
08-23-2006, 04:49 PM
Addressing the problem of how to deal with structured terrorist plots is going to have to be an ongoing policy because it's not going away. I agree.



Geer agrees with Chilly. Should I be afraid of some impending meteor shower or a plague of locusts or something?

acmanko
08-23-2006, 07:29 PM
Originally posted by chillbilly
Well, that rule of thumb didn't help the 9/11 people any.
__________________________________________________ ________

That's true. And the pre-intel was as abysmal in the initial stages of Bush's presidency as it was during Clinton's presidency.

It's fairly reasonable to assume that 9/11 was planned, for the most part during the Clinton watch and executed under the Bush watch.

There's enough blame to go around.
Addressing the problem of how to deal with structured terrorist plots is going to have to be an ongoing policy because it's not going away. all that needs to be done is look at who is planning and carrying out these attacks, i.e. identify, and then eliminate them one at a time till they are gone.

rob10
08-23-2006, 07:48 PM
It was a GOOD night!! :D :D

daytonafan
08-23-2006, 07:49 PM
Originally posted by acmanko

Originally posted by chillbilly
Well, that rule of thumb didn't help the 9/11 people any.
__________________________________________________ ________

That's true. And the pre-intel was as abysmal in the initial stages of Bush's presidency as it was during Clinton's presidency.

It's fairly reasonable to assume that 9/11 was planned, for the most part during the Clinton watch and executed under the Bush watch.

There's enough blame to go around.
Addressing the problem of how to deal with structured terrorist plots is going to have to be an ongoing policy because it's not going away. all that needs to be done is look at who is planning and carrying out these attacks, i.e. identify, and then eliminate them one at a time till they are gone.

Thats the smartest thing you have ever posted. There might be hope for you yet.

smokin68
08-23-2006, 07:51 PM
[/B][/QUOTE] all that needs to be done is look at who is planning and carrying out these attacks, i.e. identify, and then eliminate them one at a time till they are gone. [/B][/QUOTE]


Which is whom, whatever nation/individual terror group is pissed off at the USA at the time? You better have a lot of body bags....

acmanko
08-23-2006, 08:03 PM
all it takes is a bulldozer and a lot of dirt.

chillbilly
08-23-2006, 08:57 PM
Geer agrees with Chilly. Should I be afraid of some impending meteor shower or a plague of locusts or something?
__________________________________________________ _______

I'm sure geer will correct me if I'm wrong in his eyes but the probability of a meteor shower must be updated constantly and is comparatively remote at this point in time.

As for the locusts or a plague.... I'd be pleased as punch if that kind of stuff simply weren't true.

lol