View Full Version : Gore's latest revelation.
chillbilly
05-14-2006, 10:59 PM
Former Vice President Al Gore says that when it comes to global warming, reality will eventually have its day. Sort of like it did in December of 2000.
bootlen
05-15-2006, 06:50 AM
:D:D
chillbilly
05-15-2006, 12:13 PM
reality of it all.
James 3528
05-15-2006, 02:42 PM
:D and it with him too!
chillbilly
05-15-2006, 05:46 PM
I hope that fool boy doesn't think about running again.
What a conehead.
-80guru
05-15-2006, 06:25 PM
Whats scary is how many voted for him in 2000. If he is a cone head (and he is) then what does that make all those that voted for him? :)
chillbilly
05-15-2006, 06:31 PM
Bleeding heart liberals, scum bag activist pencil knecks, misguided fools and non ballot reading coneheads?
James 3528
05-15-2006, 07:13 PM
Originally posted by -80guru
Whats scary is how many voted for him in 2000. If he is a cone head (and he is) then what does that make all those that voted for him? :) John 145's , Tony's, Geer's Rob10's Frozensolid's
-80guru
05-15-2006, 08:27 PM
OMG there can't be that many of those can there?? You know one of the bad things about going down the toilet is, there is nothing to grab onto once the flushing starts. I hope that is not where this country is at.
daytonafan
05-16-2006, 06:22 PM
[[B][QUOTE]Originally posted by -80guru
[B]Whats scary is how many voted for him in 2000.
I wonder how many dead people voted for him. Democrats were also giving candy bars and cigarettes to mental patients to register and vote for Gore. He also tried to have thousands of military votes thrown out. Plus, he had a sitting president riding a "good economy" as well as MSNBC, CNN, CBS, ABC, NBC, MTV, New York Times, Atlanta Journal Constitution, Washington Times, L.A. Times, Philly Enquirer, The Florida Supreme Court, Hollywood etc... etc... etc... The 2000 election was no where near as close as we were led to believe. Bush won in a landslide if it was a fair election.
chillbilly
05-16-2006, 09:41 PM
No, actually there were only a few hundred votes that won GWB the election in Florida, after all recounts.
Gore actually won the popular vote throughout the country.
Gore's debating charisma abondoned him against Bush.
If he decides to argue issues in the upcoming campaign, I predict he will do very well without the "incumbent" pressure on him.
He cleaned Ross Perot's clock for him in their debate.
daytonafan
05-17-2006, 04:11 PM
[If he decides to argue issues in the upcoming campaign, I predict he will do very well without the "incumbent" pressure on him.
What issues? He is saying the world is going to end in 7 years. He is a career politician who has no idea how to live outside of politics and the media. He can't win on issues. Liberalism loses every time it is truly challenged. (Ronald Reagan) He is a drybag, no sense of humor having, tree hugging, tax and spend, military hating, elitist moron. If he is elected I am pulling a Alec Baldwin and moving to Canada.
He cleaned Ross Perot's clock for him in their debate. [/B][/QUOTE]
I remember those debates. I could have cleaned Perot's clock.
player89
05-17-2006, 04:37 PM
Originally posted by daytonafan
[B]
What issues? He is saying the world is going to end in 7 years.
Big Al must know something, the Mayan calendar ends in 2012, so that puts their end of the world in about 6 years.
Al gained us another year! :D
chillbilly
05-17-2006, 09:54 PM
[QUOTE][i]Originally posted by daytonafan
What issues?
__________________________________________________ _______
Any issues that are relevant at the time.
He is saying the world is going to end in 7 years.
__________________________________________________ ________
No, he's not. He's insisting that man is culpable for some of the earth's warming issues.
He is a career politician who has no idea how to live outside of politics and the media.
__________________________________________________ _______
Have you never voted for a "career politician before??
I know I have, although I would never vote for Gore.
He can't win on issues. Liberalism loses every time it is truly challenged.(Ronald Reagan)
__________________________________________________ _________
I guess ole' Ronny wasn't watching when activist liberalism occupied the Whitehouse through the 90's.
He is a drybag, no sense of humor having, tree hugging, tax and spend, military hating, elitist moron. If he is elected I am pulling a Alec Baldwin and moving to Canada.
__________________________________________________ ________
That's your choice and I'm not endorsing him. Just pointing out that he is a much more viable candidate for the Dems than anyone else they have.
I have to also point out to you that your charachterization of Gore doesn't make you appear to be much of an independent.
I remember those debates. I could have cleaned Perot's clock.____________________________________________ _________
Oh come on now. Ross Perot is a sharp man and had some very good ideas.
daytonafan
05-17-2006, 10:13 PM
I guess ole' Ronny wasn't watching when activist liberalism occupied the Whitehouse through the 90's.
----------------------------------------------------
Was it truly challenged? George H.W. Bush and Bob Dole? Come on Chilly. Who is running around with Clinton jumping in front of cameras now?
That's your choice and I'm not endorsing him. Just pointing out that he is a much more viable candidate for the Dems than anyone else they have.
----------------------------------------------------------
I would argue that Lieberman, Zel Miller, or even Evan Bayh would do better.
---------------------------------------------------------
I have to also point out to you that your charachterization of Gore doesn't make you appear to be much of an independent.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Why? I am a Constitutionalist. Gore represents everything that screams big government. Don't think ole W isn't pissing me off too. However, I would take Reagan or W anyday over Gore if we apply the "lesser of two evils" theory. Who would you rather see back as coach? Bob Davie or Jerry Faust. I'm taking Davie if I can't have Weis. Why can't I be Libertarian and hate liberalism?
http://boortz.com/
--------------------------------------------------------
Oh come on now. Ross Perot is a sharp man and had some very good ideas. [/B][/QUOTE]
--------------------------------------------------------
Did you watch those debates? I wasn't refering to his ideas, I was refering to his lack of judgement. i.e. The Admiral. You can also thank Perot for 8 years that screwed this nation up to the point where we are now.
Here, dont take my word for it. Get it right from the lib's mouth.
http://algore04.com/
[Edited by daytonafan on 05-17-2006 at 10:24 PM]
chillbilly
05-17-2006, 10:24 PM
How did Perot screw this nation up? By running and taking votes away from the GOP??
If you're a proponent of the "more than a 2 party system" mindset, you can't make the wasted vote claim.
A vote in good conscience is not wasted....right??
Also Lieberman has lost some trust from the Dems because of his courage in defending some of the president's policies.
daytonafan
05-17-2006, 10:38 PM
It is not I that is in the 2 party mindset. No vote is ever waisted. However, elections do have consequences. Do you think Clinton would have won if Perot had not entered? Ross Perot? Thats a viable 3rd party candidate in your eyes? I think we were duped in that election. Choose from the 3 stooges. Man, what options.
Please do not misunderstand me. I am not complaining that Perot was in the election. Don't pull some "waisted vote" nonsense with me.
I'm sorry I don't like Perot. Quit saying I can't be an independant because I don't like your boy.
http://www.fairvote.org/plurality/perot.htm
[Edited by daytonafan on 05-17-2006 at 11:02 PM]
chillbilly
05-18-2006, 07:55 PM
Any time a candidate gets 20% of the popular vote I do most certainly think he is a viable candidate.
Independent, Green Party, Socialist Party or whatever party and platform you want to endorse shouldn't be viewed as a candidacy that will screw up other candidates chances. Especially after the fact. That just makes you appear to be complaining, even if you weren't.
That was my point.
Your suggestion that Perot screwed up GOP chances against Clinton are no different than the whining I hear coming from the Dems about Gore's election being screwed up by Ralph Nader in Florida.
Support who you want. No one's belittling your support of any candidate. You brought up the point about Perot pal, not me. You can't have it both ways.
daytonafan
05-18-2006, 09:23 PM
I think Perot was a viable candidate. I also think he did a lot to wake this country up a bit. I think you are misssing my point. I am simply saying that the result of Perot happened to be Clinton. I am also saying that I (thats just me Chilly, not everybody else) didn't like his total platform.
To summarize: I don't think Perot running was bad, I think it was good. Simple numbers show that he helped Clinton more than hurt him. I don't like Ross Perot. If you do, fine. That doesn't mean I am not an independant.
chillbilly
05-18-2006, 09:51 PM
[QUOTE]Originally posted by daytonafan
I think you are misssing my point. I am simply saying that the result of Perot happened to be Clinton.
__________________________________________________ ________
The result of Perot happened to be Clinton? I don't think I missed your point at all.
Anywho, the point is moot because IMHO,Bill Clinton would have whipped Bush senior regardless of WHO else was on the ballot. Period. That election was a sign of the political climate favoring Democrats.
To summarize: I don't think Perot running was bad, I think it was good. Simple numbers show that he helped Clinton more than hurt him. I don't like Ross Perot. If you do, fine. That doesn't mean I am not an independant.
__________________________________________________ _________
Uh, OK. Your party affiliations don't bother me and you can rest assured that your dislike for GWB doesn't bother me either.
FYI... This site is nothing more than controlled folly for me.
bootlen
05-18-2006, 10:17 PM
Gore's latest revelation...W won.
chillbilly
05-18-2006, 10:26 PM
[QUOTE][i]Originally posted by bootlen
[B]Gore's latest revelation...W won.
__________________________________________________ ________
LOL! Yeah, and if an Independent helped him, that's good too.
oogene
05-18-2006, 11:53 PM
Gore doesn't have "revelations", more like cerebral flatulence-kinda like his fuzzy math!!!
daytonafan
05-22-2006, 06:35 PM
http://www.drudgereportarchives.com/dsp/specialReports_pc_carden_detail.htm?reportID=%7B08 FAD3B1-9FAF-4037-BF26-573B2826B2C3%7D
I rest my case.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0 Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.